Whose Reality Will We Accept?

Whose Reality Will We Accept?

Humans have a way of trying to impose their own beliefs on the world and seeking to change it to their own desires. Much of these efforts are denials of what is really real. It is a sure path for failure. What is really real? Ultimately, God is what is real, and when we fight reality, we are fighting Him. Reality isn’t what we want it to be. It is what God wants it to be. Disappointment happens when our expectations don’t match reality. We become disillusioned and may even fall into despair. Some just decide it isn’t worth it to stick around anymore. There is a better way.

Instead of seeking to change the world to match our desires, we should change ourselves to match God’s world. This is God’s message to us in the Bible. Sin is not just “moral” failure; it is a failure of perspective on our place in God’s creation. That’s what Paul is seeking to get across in Romans 1:21: “because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened.”

What happens when the heart is darkened? We try to change reality to conform to our desires instead of conforming our desires to reality. “And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God” (Romans 12:2). When we transform ourselves to God’s will, we prove God’s good, acceptable, and perfect will. That is, we show it, in our lives, to be true. It’s not that God’s will is false if we don’t do this, rather, our own lives are.

God bless you, and I love you.

Posted in Kevin Cauley | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Whose Reality Will We Accept?

A String on Your Finger

A String on Your Finger

I am not sure where the idea originated, but it has been around for decades. If there was something really important you needed to remember, you were told to put a string (or ribbon) on your finger to remind you. I am sure other cultures may have similar figures of speech and times have changed in our world. More recently we talk about putting it on our calendar or putting a reminder on our cell phone.

It is remarkable that the Jews evidently did something very much like this. When Moses gave the law, he told the Jews to do two things to keep God’s word before them. They were to write them on the gates and doors of their houses or to write God’s words and put them in containers and wear these containers on their hands or around their heads, just above their eyes.

Moses said, “You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes. You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your doors” (Deut. 6:8-9—in the New Testament these containers or frontlets are called phylacteries—Matt. 23:5). They did not put strings on their fingers, they wore them before their eyes.

Evidently, they also wrote words on their hands. Have you not at some time or another used a pen to write important numbers or details on your hand when you could not find paper you might use? Isaiah indicates the Jews did this when he described how and where God wrote His message.

What was that message that was so important that He wrote it down on His hand? It was written in that part of Isaiah where he told the Jews that they were headed for captivity, and he then began to give a detailed description of the coming of the Messiah. When they were in captivity, they might have felt that God had forgotten them. Such was not the case for after the captivity of the Messiah, the suffering Servant would come.

What was that message God wrote? Perhaps if we knew what He wrote it might help us know and understand our God even better. What was that message? Read these words slowly and carefully. “Yet I will not forget you. See, I have inscribed you on the palms of my hands” (Isa. 49:16). God had written the name of His people on the palms of His hand!

God had not forgotten Israel, and He has not forgotten us! It was not a string on a finger—it was your name written on the palm of His hand. As I thought about all of this, I could not help but remember the words of Thomas about not believing in Jesus unless he saw the nail prints in His hand. As you think about the fact that God remembers us, look at the hands of Jesus. Figuratively, your name is beside those wounds in His hands!

Posted in Dan Jenkins | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on A String on Your Finger

ABEJAS (UNA DULCE DANZA) 

ABEJAS (UNA DULCE DANZA) 

No recuerdo con exactitud cuántos piquetes tenía, pero cuando aún era niño, un grupo de abejas decidió arremeterla contra mí por solamente porque tomé su colmena como tiro al blanco  con un mango (fruta) para saber de qué color eran las abejas. Desde entonces nuestra relación no ha sido buena. En la danza de las abejas el objetivo es comunicar dos cosas: 1) la dirección y 2) la distancia. Cuando existe alimento relativamente cerca, las obreras danzan en forma circular. Existe otra danza que lo que comunica es la distancia como también la dirección. El etólogo Karl Von Frisch es sin lugar a dudas un pionero en estas investigaciones. Este sistema de comunicación, supervivencia y diseño es uno maravilloso uno más de los más asombrosos que existen en el reino animal.

Hay muchas cosas pero considero que lo más sorprendente de la danza es que les dice a las otras abejas exactamente dónde está la comida. La abeja utiliza el sol como punto de referencia. Si la abeja baila en línea recta hacia la derecha, entonces la comida está directamente a la derecha del sol. Si la abeja baila hacia arriba, entonces la comida se encuentra directamente hacia el sol. Si la abeja baila hacia abajo por el panal, entonces el alimento está en línea directa pero lejos del sol. Además, los sonidos que hace la abeja mientras “mueve” su cuerpo de un lado a otro ayudan a las otras abejas a saber a qué distancia está la comida y exactamente dónde encontrarla.

El Creador y Su Palabra

Nunca podré volver a leer  de la misma forma el Salmo 119:103 que compara la dulzura de la palabra de Dios al espíritu del hombre con la dulzura de la miel de las abejas al paladar. El beneplácito que la miel provee al hombre debería de ser suficiente al intentar comprender la razón por la que el creador decide incorporar a estos insectos a nuestro globo terráqueo. Todo lo que es obra de sus manos comparte el mismo elemento de complejidad irreducible, desde la muy diminuta abeja con ojos tan complejos que aún los científicos no cuentan con todos los detalles al respecto, hasta la complejidad del ser humano (la creación más compleja y perfecta de Dios). El creador de las abejas es un ser extremadamente gentil (pues las abejas realizan este baile para avisar a las demás) pero también un ser profundamente humilde que le place ver a otros trabajar en equipo (la colmena funciona como uno solo). De estos rasgos que se encuentran muy bien marcados en el carácter de Dios, de ellos goza la palabra de Dios cuando nos exhorta a trabajar como uno (1Co.1:10-12) pero también a ser bondadosos y gentiles (1Co.13:1-8). La creación se parece a su creador.

Lo que el Diseño en las Abejas Significa

En lógica, en relación a los métodos de deducción, una disyuntiva podría poner punto final a la discusión ya que la misma tiene por regla que si uno es falso la otra es verdadera automáticamente y viceversa. Aplicado a la cuestión de la existencia de Dios, lo único que se necesita es probar que una implicación es falsa, pues si la implicación es falsa también el antecedente lo es. Por ejemplo, entre creación vs evolución (disyuntiva), demostrar que una implicación de la evolución es falsa provocaría dos cosas: 1) Que una de las disyuntivas es falsa y 2) Que la otra automáticamente es verdadera. Sugiero que hagamos el ejercicio.

EVOLUCIÓN

  1. Adaptación de las especies. Las abejas fueron forzadas a evolucionar con la danza y todo lo que observó al profesor Karl incluido su magnífico y complejo ojo.
  2. Implicación. Tuvieron que 1) haber aprendido esa conducta con diseño, 2) haberlo diseñado ellas mismas o 3) salieron así de la nada por la naturaleza.

Por favor, note con atención el panorama que tenemos frente a nosotros. Ahora lo único que tengo que hacer es probar que hay un razonamiento erróneo en la implicación y a través de lo que la lógica le llama Modus Tolles, todo lo demás se viene al suelo… Creo que si usted jugó con trocitos de madera para construir una torre mientras la persona le va quitando un trozo a la vez, siendo la meta no permitir que la torre se caiga, aquí sucede igual. Quitaremos un trocito de esa torre y veremos cómo la evolución se derrumba.

  1. Implicación. Si las abejas, 1) aprendieron esa conducta, ¿Quién le enseñó de ellas aprendieron? Y ahí es donde te damos la bienvenida al razonamiento circular infinito, que no resuelve nada y además no dice nada… 2) si lo diseñaron ellas mismas misma pregunta que la anterior, pero, además admitir que lo diseñaron ellas mismas es admitir un diseño, si se admite un diseño…se admite un diseñador.  Y 3) la naturaleza funciona con diseño. Nuevamente caemos en la corriente del razonamiento circular.
  2. Además, Además de haber respondido a lo que planteaba el enunciado como tal, podría añadir el hecho de que sería imposible la subsistencia de las abejas mismas, pues entre millones de años propuestos por la evolución como una varita mágica que soluciona todo, la especie hubiese desaparecido, de no contar con esta maravillosa habilidad de diseño con la que cuentan.

La implicación ha quedado demostrada como falsa, y por lo tanto, el antecedente (la teoría de la evolución) también lo es. Por la disyuntiva existente, automáticamente el creacionismo queda establecido como verdadero.

—¿Usted cree en Dios? En muchas ocasiones me han preguntado tanto a mí como a usted seguramente. Creer en la existencia de Dios no es un asunto de preferencia, religión, formación en el hogar ni siquiera es una cuestión utópica. Creer en la existencia del Dios de la Biblia, Un creador con poder ilimitado, superior a todo y todos los seres que coexistimos, es la cosa más lógica, brillante y consecuente con la evidencia, que uno pueda creer. Cree en Dios porque la evidencia lo demuestra, pero la razón lo demanda con denuedo.

Conclusión

Las palabras de Kyle Butt de la prensa apologética son precisas al llegar a nuestra conclusión. Este grandioso y experimentado  apologista en su investigación sobre la danza de las abejas escribe lo siguiente: “Este notable “lenguaje de danza” no podría haber evolucionado”. Códigos y lenguajes como este deben haber sido programados en abejas por un diseñador inteligente. La danza de las abejas no solo muestra a otras abejas el camino hacia la comida, sino que también muestra a los humanos que hay un Dios maravilloso que les dio a las abejas una forma asombrosa de comunicarse”.  Estas apreciaciones parecen ser la explicación más razonable de las características del diseño inteligente y especialmente la danza de las abejas.

REFERENCIAS

Butt, Kyle. (2010). La maravillosa danza de las abejas. Apologetic Pres.

 https://apologeticspress.org/the-amazing-bee-dance-3074/

Posted in Heiner Montealto | Tagged , , | Comments Off on ABEJAS (UNA DULCE DANZA) 

ChatGPT, Tecnology, & Your Children

ChatGPT, Tecnology, & Your Children

Christians should have an understanding of the times—especially when it comes to training up our children. 1 Chronicles 12:32 says, “the sons of Issachar who had understanding of the times, to know what Israel ought to do, their chiefs were two hundred; and all their brethren were at their command;”

Paul wrote to the Christians in Rome, “And do this, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep; for now our salvation is nearer than when we first believed. The night is far spent, the day is at hand. Therefore let us cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armor of light” (Romans 13:11-12).chatgpt

One of the things we should be informed on is ChatGPT, and chat bot AI.

While those words may seem like a foreign language to many of you, I suspect your children are not only familiar with ChatGPT, most have either already played with it or have downloaded the App.

Simply put, ChatGPT is a conversational chatbot by OpenAI that can produce text, based on any question or request. If that sentence also sounded like a foreign language allow me to try and put it into even simpler terms: The internet has a feature of programmed artificial intelligence that can write things for you and answer questions.

For instance, need a term paper on Johann Sebastian Bach and his music? Not only can ChatGPT easily handle the job, you can even tell it things like how long you want the paper (i.e., 500 words) or what grade level you would like it written in (i.e., 7th grade). [I actually asked for an essay on the life of Johann Sebastin Bach in 500 words, which it gave me. I then asked for it from a 5th grader—and it changed the wording to match words commonly used by 5th graders.]

Many people are already using ChatGPT technology to assist them in writing emails and papers. Hopefully parents are already realizing one “issue” with this new technology. Suddenly essays, term papers, and research papers can be done in the blink of an eye with little to no effort from the student. Using ChatGPT means we did not actually do the work ourselves.

So, one area we are going to have to talk to our children about is the ethics of not doing an assignment—but rather, allowing a computer to do it for us.

But what about the darker side of ChatGPT. So this technology is conversational. Many of our young people are having fun asking it all kinds of crazy questions. But some of those questions have eternal consequences. For instance, I have had a couple of young people share questions they have asked ChatGPT about things like evolution and God. The answers these young people received was definitely not from a Biblical worldview. In both cases the chat bot was sowing seeds of doubt. (In one case the young person was giving serious consideration to changing their faith based on the responses he received.)

I decided to investigate firsthand, so I asked ChatGPT “Is there a God?” Here was the response I received:

“From a religious standpoint, many faith traditions assert the existence of a higher power or divine being(s) that governs the universe and plays a role in human affairs. These beliefs are often based on sacred texts, personal experiences, and faith.

On the other hand, some individuals hold an atheistic or agnostic viewpoint, asserting that there is no evidence or convincing arguments for the existence of God. They may rely on scientific explanations, empirical evidence, and philosophical reasoning to support their position.”

Notice the first paragraph uses words like “beliefs” and “experiences.” The second paragraph, talking about atheism, uses words like “evidence,” “scientific explanations,” “empirical evidence” and “philosophical reasoning.” It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out which direction this bot leans.

I explained to both young men that the way these chat bots work is by breaking down language inputs, such as sentences or paragraphs, into smaller components and analyzing their meanings and then answering using data collected from the internet and machine learning—much of which was coming from an atheistic worldview. These bots rely on data input—and much of the data it combs through is secular and godless.

My fears were confirmed when I asked deeper—more philosophical questions such as, “Is Jesus the only way to heaven.” I asked questions about Christianity, the institution of marriage and family, etc. It became obvious very quickly that this bot is strongly advocating diversity, inclusion, and worldviews that are in direct conflict with the Bible.

I only spent a short amount of time with this chat bot, and yet, I was inundated with a tsunami of statements that would cause many young people to question their faith. Some of it very subtle and seemingly harmless. Some of it downright antithetical to God’s Word. We should not be surprised, as much of the web and the data out there were uploaded from individuals who do not hold to New Testament Christianity.

All of this comes at the same time news agencies are reporting a massive rise on AI-generated images of pornography, child porn, and child sexual abuse. Yes, you read that correctly. They are using similar technology to generate pornographic images—including child porn. Parents, it is critically important that take the role of protecting our children extremely seriously—especially in this cyber world. Make sure you know what your children are doing online. And if you don’t have filters on your devices please consider getting them!

Let me encourage parents to have a serious conversation with your children. Discuss what ethics are and where we derive our ethical standard from. Talk to them about the broad and narrow way, and which road has more people on it—and then contrast that with the data on the internet. Talk to them about why Paul wrote Philippians 4:8 and what that means in regards to the internet. Encourage them if they have Bible questions or questions about life to come and ask you first. And finally, set some boundaries on this new technology. Be proactive instead of reactive. Help them navigate through this crazy new technology.

Posted in Brad Harrub | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on ChatGPT, Tecnology, & Your Children

The Church is a Hospital

The Church is a Hospital

Perhaps you have heard the title of this article before. It is meant to illustrate the function of the church. A hospital is a place where people who are physically sick or injured go to get better. The church is also such a place, but in a spiritual way. People who are spiritually sick or injured should find healing through the efforts of the church. Sometimes people criticize the church as being a place of hypocrites precisely because there are spiritually sick or injured people in the church. That would be a valid criticism if the church were not doing anything to heal these spiritually damaged people. However, the goal is for spiritually sick people to become well through the work and teaching of Jesus. He said, “I am not come to call the righteous but sinners to repentance” (Luke 5:32).soul hospital

We should be careful, though, that the church does not become a spiritual hospice care facility, where the sick go, not to be cured, but to die from their illness. Jesus expects members of his church to put away their sins, not remain in them. Forgiveness is a path to holiness, not a path to ongoing sinfulness. That is why Jesus also said, “Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father who is in heaven” (Matthew 7:21). We are to “put away” all the sins of the flesh (Ephesians 4:22, Colossians 3:8). We are to be holy as He is holy (1 Peter 1:15-16). John wrote, “My little children, let no man lead you astray: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous” (1 John 3:7). We must make a serious effort to obey the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Posted in Kevin Cauley | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Church is a Hospital