Selfish Ambition

The proud father strokes the blond hair on his little boys head and asks, “What do you want to be when you grow up?” “An Astronaut,” he replies with wide-eyed optimism.

The teacher asks the same question to her third-grade class and in turn each child responds. “The President!” “A professional baseball player!” “A firefighter!” Each answer is greeted by a confident affirmation. “Great!” “You can be anything you want to be if you put your mind to it.” And thus begins the downward spiral of those lives and our society in the pursuit of selfish ambition.

Now I am not suggesting that we should not encourage or provide our future generations with the necessary opportunities to be all they can be and to do great things. What I am suggesting is that we have (and are) failing to reply to their hopes and dreams with a proper perspective and focus.

Two things come immediately to mind. One is; no matter how I might set my mind to it there are some things I will never be able to do! I will never be able to outrun Usane Bolt! Ridiculous observation you say? No more so than many of the things we tell our children they can do if they “just put their minds to it.” In anticipated response to the offended parent at my attempt to crush little Johnny’s future grandeur allow me to suggest that the correct response is to ask the question, “Why?”

If every young person grew up with an emphasis on service to God and others, this world, and the church, would be a far better place. And not just service for the sake of service, or for the end of feeling good about ourselves, but that we might please God and bring others to Him. We emphasis the idea of letting our “light so shine before men” that they may see our good works. But why should we do so is the more important question. The answer is that they might glorify the Father, not us (Matthew 5:16).

Paul warned the church in Rome that God’s wrath, and not His blessing, would be on those who served out of selfish ambition. “But in accordance with your hardness and your impenitent heart you are treasuring up for yourself wrath in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God, who ‘will render to each one according to his deeds’: eternal life to those who by patient continuance in doing good seek for glory, honor, and immortality; but to those who are self-seeking and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness—indignation and wrath,” (Romans 2:5-8).

Self-seeking here is translated in other versions as “selfishly ambitious,” “self-willed,” and “self-seeking.” While other translations use the words “contentious” and “factious” because that is exactly what such ambition brings. In James 3:16 we read, “For where envy and self-seeking exist, confusion and every evil thing are there.”

Also consider the well-established truth that it doesn’t matter so much what we say, but what we do. We may teach our children to be selfless in service and then they may see something completely different in our lives. Philippians 2:3 says, “Let nothing be done through selfish ambition or conceit, but in lowliness of mind let each esteem others better than himself.”

Ask yourself this tough question, “Why do I do the things I do?” Be honest. And be prepared to not like the answer. But be prepared to do something about it! “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service. And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God” (Romans 12:1-2).

Posted in Tim Dooley | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Selfish Ambition

Read the Bible

IT IS AVAILABLE TO ALL:

Do you read the Bible on a regular basis? Some people do not own a Bible; this is evidence that they possess little or no knowledge of God, the right path to pursue in lifestyle, or in other areas of existence. It is such a shame to know nothing of God and His way of righteousness since the Bible is available to anyone today. You see; the Bible is available to read and examine at any library or any religious establishment. There is no reason for anyone to be ignorant of the Bible’s teaching on any subject.

IS IT IMPORTANT?

            The Bible and knowledge about its contents is important to everyone for a number of reasons, let me list a few:

The Bible claims for itself that it is authored by GOD:

2 Timothy 3:15-16, “15 And that from a babe thou hast known the sacred writings which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. 16 Every scripture inspired of God (is) also profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for instruction which is in righteousness.” ASV

NOTE:

Definition of inspiration — INSPIRATION. The doctrine of the inspiration of Scripture is of immense importance. This is at once apparent when one considers that all Christian doctrine are developed from the Bible and rest upon it for authority. L.Boettner is correct when he calls the biblical teaching of inspiration “the mother and guardian of all the others” (Studies in Theology {1947}, p. 48). An unsound view of inspiration of Scripture is bound to countenance unsound views, produce distorted teachings or serious gaps in essential doctrinal systematization, or offer a temptation to too easy subscription to plausible but unsound scientific or philosophic theorizing.

The Scriptural Definition of Inspiration. In defining divine inspiration in the distinctive sense in which it is employed in Holy Scriptures, the difference in meaning of this expression from revelation and illumination must be carefully comprehended.

Revelation. Revelation, which may be oral or written, may be defined, as an operation of God communicating to man truth that otherwise man could not know. Since man was created in God’s image and endowed with capacity to know God, it is rational to expect that God would communicate Himself and His mind to man.

Inspiration. “A supernatural influence exerted on the sacred writers by the Spirit of God, by virtue of which their writings are given Divine trustworthiness”) B. B. Warfield, “Inspiration,” Int. Std. Bible Ency., p. 1473).

In defining scriptural inspiration three factors must be kept in mind:

FIRST, the primary efficient Cause, the Holy Spirit, who acts upon man.

SECOND, the subject of inspiration, man, the agent upon whom the Holy Spirit acts directly;

THIRD, the result of inspiration, a written revelation, given once for all time (i.e. Jude 3 – glc), thoroughly accredited and tested by miracle and fulfilled prophecy (cf. J.E. Stein Mueller, Companion to Scripture Studies {1941}, 1:5, 14).

Illumination, Illumination is a ministry of the Holy Spirit that enables all who are in right relation wit

God to understand the objective written revelation. Thus, revelation and recording, and illumination, understanding or comprehending the written objective revelation.

In other words,

*Revelation comprehends God’s giving truth.

**Inspiration embraces man under divine control accurately receiving the truth thus given.

***Illumination deals with man’s understanding the God-given, inspired revelation (1 Cor 2:13).

Revelation as it concerns Holy Scripture had a specific time period involving the inspiration of certain sovereignty chosen individuals as the recipients of the Revelation. It is plain that all of these divine operations have ceased.

THE SCRIPTURAL DOCTRINE OF INSPIRATION.

The Fact of inspiration Stated.

2 Timothy 3:16-17, “16 Every scripture inspired of God (is) also profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for instruction which is in righteousness.

17 That the man of God may be complete, furnished completely unto every good work.” ASV

Five great truths are herein taught:

FIRST, the plenary inspiration of the Bible, “all”;

SECOND, The plenary inspiration specifically of the O.T., plainly implying the entire N.T. as well, that is, “all Scripture”;

THIRD, the divine authorship of Scripture-“inspired by God” (“God breathed”);

FOURTH, the supreme value of all Scripture to the spiritual life, “profitable fir teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness”;

FIFTH, the holy purpose of Scripture, “that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.”

The Fact of Inspiration Implied.

The sacred authors were prophets and apostles of God’s Word in the highest sense of the term. Scripture is filled with such expressions as “Now the Word of the Lord came … saying” (1 Kings 16:1); “Thus the Lord said to me … (Jeremiah 13:1); “The word of the Lord came expressly to Ezekiel” (Ezek 1:3). The apostle Paul and others claimed to speak by direct revelation)Eph 3:1-10; etc.). Prophets spoke of future events (such as Moses’ foretelling the coming of the great Prophet, Christ- Deut 18:15-18) and have had their predictions verified during succeeding centuries. David (Psalm 22 and Isaiah (Isaiah 53 minutely prophesied the suffering, death, and resurrection of Christ. Daniel previewed the rise of Persia, Greece, and Rome (Daniel 2:37-40; 7:4-7). Some prophets, such as Moses, Elijah, and Elisha, had their messages authenticated by miracles. Others had an irresistible compulsion to speak, such as Jeremiah (Jeremiah 20:9). They were often commanded to write their utterances or wrote under divine leading (Exodus 24:4; Deut 27:8; Isaiah 30:8; Jeremiah 30:2; Luke 1:1-3; etc.).

Nature of inspiration.

2 Peter 1:20-21, “20 knowing this first, that no prophecy of scripture is of private interpretation. 21 For no prophecy ever came by the will of man: but men spake from God, being moved by the Holy Spirit.” ASV

This pivotal passage deals with the question of how Scripture was inspired.

FIRST, it declares how it did not originate-it is not “a matter of one’s interpretation.” It is not the result of human research nor the product of the writer’s own thought. It did not come into being by the will of man.

Man did not purpose to write it, decide its subject matter, or outline its arrangement.

SECOND, this passage tells how the Scriptures did originate. “Men,” that is, certain divinely selected men, “spoke from God,” the source. These inspired men were borne, or carried along, by the Holy Spirit, the message being His, not theirs. Accordingly, if it can be demonstrated that we have the words they spoke and wrote transmitted substantially in identical form with the original documents, and the science of textual criticism enables this to be done, then a charge of error is a charge against God, where the supposed “error” may be due to textual corruption in the long course of transmission. Where the text has unquestionably suffered in transmission, the laborers of devoted scholars are directed to its restoration. This is done through ancient versions, textual variants, and other linguistic and historical evidence continuously being made available by Archaeology and various other phases of sound Biblical research.

Other Scriptural Proofs of the Inspiration of the Scriptures, God spoke through O.T. prophets (Heb 1:1-2) The O.T. Scriptures are inviolable (i.e. secure from violation) John 10:34-36). The indefectibility (i.e. not subject to failure or decay) and certain of promise and prophecy are clearly seen in the oft-recurring expression “:that what was spoken … might be fulfilled” (Matt 1:22; 2:15, 23; 8:17; 12:17; etc) and in such Scripture as 24:35, “Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words shall not pass away.” Jesus quoted the O.T. as authoritative (4:4, t, 10). The Holy Spirit in the prophets equipped them for their ministry (1 Peter 1:10-11), and the Spirit of God spoke through David (2 Sam 23:1-2) and other prophets. Besides the Scriptural proofs, unbroken Jewish and Christian traditions attests the inspiration of Scripture.

The True Biblical Doctrine of Inspiration.

Scripture nowhere fully explains the precise modus operandi (i.e. a method of procedure) of inspiration, yet it is possible to formulate a doctrine that is in agreement with all plain and sufficient Scriptural revelation vouchsafed to us. This doctrine, almost universally rejected today based on alleged philosophic, scientific, historical, archaeological, and linguistic difficulties involved, is called verbal, plenary inspiration. It is sometimes called the dynamic view. This view holds that the superintendence of the Holy Spirit rendered the writers of Scripture infallible in their communications of truth and inerrant in their literary productions. Yet, it leaves room for the fullest play of the personality, style, and background of the individual authors. By verbal inspiration is signified that in the original writings the Holy Spirit led in the choice of each word used (CF. 1 Cor 2:13; John 10:34-36). Compare Gal 3:16, where the problem turns upon the singular or plural of a word.

By plenary inspiration is meant that the accuracy that verbal inspiration insures is extended to every portion of the sacred revelation, so that it is as a whole and in all its constituent parts infallible as to truth and final as to divine authority.  This is the traditional teaching of the church and is that doctrine set forth by Christ and the apostles. This teaching preserves the duel authorship of Scripture (The divine and the human) in perfect balance, ascribing to each the consideration that is accorded in the Bible.

Results if Inspiration.  The Bible having been brought into existence by the supernatural action of the Holy Spirit upon the sacred writers, the question is what is the result of this divine process in the product itself.

The Absolute Inerrancy of the Autograph. Absolute freedom from error must be attributed to the original copies of the inspired writings. It is unthinkable that inaccuracy and mistakes can coexist with inspiration. Can God who is Supreme Truth speak that which is untrue?

The claim of verbal, plenary inspiration for the original writings, however, does not extend to the multitudinous transcriptions and various translations, both ancient and modern. Inerrancy applies to transcriptions such as the Masoretic-Hebrew text, the Greek N.T. text, and the translations such as the Septuagint, Vulgate, Syriac, Luther’s Bible, and various English versions only insofar as autographic manuscripts.

Since none of the original manuscripts is in existence, critics commonly reject the inerrancy of the autograph, as “an assumption for which there is no warrant in sound reason” (G. Maines, Divine Inspiration, P. 109). But the fact and the truth rest not upon “reason” but upon the clear revelation of the Scriptures themselves) (2 Tim 3:16; 2 Peter 1:20-21).

Providential Preservation of Scripture with Regard to Its Substance. The Holy Spirit, it is reasonable to conclude, also had a definite ministry in preserving the inspired Scriptures through millennia of transmission. Possible errors that have crept in because of copyists’ slips, glosses, etc, are the domain of lower criticism and here the Christian scholar may find a worthy task for his labors. The high development of N.T. textual criticism as the result of many manuscripts finds has given us the transmitted text in a high degree of purity. Lack of manuscript evidence in the O.T. field has seriously curtailed textual criticism and hence there are many more irresolvable textual difficulties in the O.T. than in the N.T. Recent phenomenal manuscript finds such as the Dead Sea Scrolls (notably the Isaiah Manuscript) are tending to alleviate this condition regarding the O.T. text.

Scriptural Inerrancy Embraces Scientific Features. In this realm, although serious problems exist, there are no proved facts of science that necessitate abandonment of the scriptural doctrine of inspiration. Many scientific theorizing would seem to suggest this; but when the Bible is correctly placed in the pre-scientific era in which it had its birth, its alleged scientific inaccuracies are much less formidable than the liberal or neo-orthodox interpreter would have us believe.

Scriptural Inerrancy Embraces Historical and Literary Features. In no field has the Bible been more seriously challenged than in the historical. While it is true that many serious historical problems remain, such as the existence of the Philistines in patriarchal times, the date of the Exodus, and the identity of Darius the Mede in the Book of Daniel, archaeology has made colossal contributions toward resolving many of these problems. The exist of Sargon II, the Hittites and the Horites (the Hurrians), the religion of the Canaanites, the historicity of the patriarchs and many other serious problems has been cleared up.

Although there is almost universal rejection of a thoroughly sound teaching of biblical inspiration in our day, the conservative scholar with an abundance of this new apologetic material at his disposal may well hesitate before abandoning this solid foundation of true biblical exposition and theological systematization.

NOTE:

Inspiration guarantees the reliability of the Bible as a Divine document, a document that man today may fully accept as truth

BIBLOGRAPHY: available on request – glclair@aol.com

SUMMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

Garreth L. Clair

Since the Bible is inspired, its contents will reveal to man the way man ought to live in this world, how to survive physical death and where he will reside after that.

The Bible claims for itself that it is complete, that it does not need updating, ever.

2 Timothy 3:15-17, “15 And that from a babe thou hast known the sacred writings which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. 16 Every scripture inspired of God (is) also profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for instruction which is in righteousness. 17 That the man of God may be complete, furnished completely unto every good work.” ASV

GET A GOOD TRANSLATION OF THE BIBLE

There are many translations of the Bible that one may purchase in book stores today, many of the Bibles translations today are misleading, many are not translations at all but are paraphrase editions or one man commentaries rather that accurate translations. Some of the most accurate and reliable translations available today are the K.J.V. – the N.K.J.V. – The A.S.V. (1901 – May be purchased from Star Bible and book publishers) – the N.A.S.V.

These translations are very good and I do recommend them for use by serious Bible study. Greek and Hebrew scholars generally consider these translations the very best. My personal pick is the A.S.V. (1901). Once you have acquired a good translation of the Bible, study it with the intention of conforming your life to its precepts. You will find that your life will be better generally because your faith and relationship to God is according to “truth.”

Posted in Garreth L. Clair | Tagged , | Comments Off on Read the Bible

Voting and the Christian

The Christian and His Vote

Several decades ago, the question “What would Jesus do?” was a big fad. Jesus, along with all those in the first century, lived when the Romans were in power. Even several centuries preceding this, we know that the world was ruled by dictators (Babylonian, Medo-Persian, and Greek). However, if Jesus and the apostles lived in a democracy, what would they do? For those who live in such countries (such as the USA), we have a luxurious privilege and blessing that many citizens of other countries do not possess—we have a voice! Yes, even Christians have a voice when it comes to the election of our political leaders! Totalitarian governments do not allow people to express their choices at the polls, but countless individuals in the past literally have given their lives to make this freedom possible. God has blessed us to have a “government of the people, by the people and for the people” (as President Lincoln addressed at Gettysburg). Inherent within this privilege is a responsibility as citizens—to inform ourselves of the issues and the candidates. Thus, voting is a choice of people who enjoy civil freedom!

How to deal with the government has always been a problem for the people of God. When the Pharisees attempted to trap Jesus regarding the subject of taxes—a quite sensitive issue among people both then and now—he asked for a coin and responded, “Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s” (Matt. 22:15-21). Unfortunately, it seems that there has been, and will always be, tension between our obligation to God and our obligation to our country. While we are citizens of a heavenly country (Phil. 3:20), and the kingdom of God is not of this world (John 18:36), we are still to view our governmental rulers with respect (Rom. 13:1-7). Regrettably, some Christians do not exercise their right to vote. From a civic perspective, they become apathetic. Alexander Tyler, a Scottish historian, wrote about the fall of the Athenian republic and stated that most nations progress through a specific sequence from rise to power and then to collapse. Detailing such, he itemized these stages as follows: bondage to spiritual faith, spiritual faith to great courage, great courage to liberty, liberty to abundance, abundance to selfishness, selfishness to complacency, complacency to apathy, apathy to dependency, and dependency back to bondage.  As a nation, where do we fall in this sequence? As a Christian citizen, where do we fall in this sequence? Do we personally care?

How tragic that very few Christians have undertaken the duty of serving in a public office! Many Christians are crestfallen when it comes to seeking civic leadership positions, because they believe the corruption within would quite literally choke any godly influence out from the good-hearted child of God. Yet, the quandary lies in the fact that while the general attitude among Christians is negative toward politics and politicians, it is equally true that our democratic nations need men and women of faith in leadership positions now more than ever! We need good people who will exercise godly wisdom to bring about reformation (Prov. 14:34). How will we ever reach this point if we choose never to voice our opinion or cast our vote? If God could act through human kings of days gone by (often influenced by godly men, such as Daniel and Nehemiah), why could He not act through His own people today when they serve in leadership positions?

William James (1842-1910), a renowned philosopher and spokesperson, once said, “There is but one unconditional commandment, which is that we should seek incessantly, with fear and trembling, so to vote and to act as to bring about the very largest total universe of good we can see” (“The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life”). He also stated,

The deadliest enemies of nations are not their foreign foes; they always dwell within their borders, and from these internal enemies, civilization is always in need of being saved. The nation blessed above all nations is she in whom the civic genius of the people does the saving day by day, by acts without external picturesqueness; by speaking, writing, voting reasonably; by smiting corruption swiftly; by good temper between parties; by the people knowing true men when they see them and preferring them as leaders to rabid partisans or empty quacks. (“Memories and Studies”)

Therefore, Christians ought to desire to be good citizens and exercise their freedom to vote according to principles of character and morality. Indifference and apathy are truly the worst enemies in the civic arena—may they never be demonstrated by the people of God! It is time to stand boldly against the sins of our nation and the issues that affect morality! May every Christian exercise his or her right and privilege to vote, and accompany such with fervent prayers (1 Tim. 2:1-2)!

 

Posted in Sam Willcut | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Voting and the Christian

Do Animals Have Spirits?

IS MURDERING AN ANIMAL WRONG AND ALSO DO ANIMALS HAVE SPIRITS LIKE A MAN DOES?

Well, Gen. 9:2-3 states, “the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered. Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.”  So, we can kill to eat.  Grocery stores are filled with meat, chicken, fish, whether fresh, frozen, or canned.  And, there is nothing wrong to eat meat.

However, I do have a problem with just murdering or killing for sport.  I remember target shooting once with some friends and they would just shoot innocent birds who did nothing to no one: they were just sitting there.

But, the closest reference to sport hunting is Proverbs 12:27, “ The slothful (treacherous) man roasteth not that which he took in hunting: but the substance of a diligent man is precious.”  So whatever view one takes on sport hunting, it is good and right for the hunted animal to be eaten, not just killed for a trophy.  As for the Bible, sport hunting was not a common practice then.  The reason for this is the fact that man hunted for food.  In order to put food on the table you either had to grow it, hunt it, and in some cases buy it or trade for it.  Furs were used for clothing or sold in order to purchase things, and in many cases the furs of animals were currency.  For early Americans, this was the case.  You simply did not sport hunt in those days.  So, it is hard to make a sport out of something you depended upon daily.

Now, as for animal spirits vs. man’s spirit, animals have a soul in the sense that they possess life, they breathe and are aware.  And so, men and animals alike possess a soul in the sense of breath.  However, in the sense of possessing a part or element that lives forever, as man possesses, animals do not possess an eternal spirit.  In Matt. 25:46, Jesus tells us the two groups that are eternal.  The animal simply and totally returns to the dust, the spirit of man continues to exist (Eccl. 3: 21, cp. 12: 7).

But, the fact that animals do not possess an eternal soul in the sense that man does, does not de-emphasize their value as companions to man.  Pets can and do become an important part in the lives of millions.  Also, in man’s charge over the animal kingdom, it is necessary that man protect and not abuse animals (Gen. 1: 26-28).

Posted in Robert Notgrass | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Do Animals Have Spirits?

Conflicting Worldviews in Politics

The media describes the upcoming political race as the most polarized in political history. Some have disputed this by pointing to the 1828 election that pitted Andrew Jackson against John Quincy Adams. Conflicts in politics are nothing new to our Republic. However, one significant difference today is the issue of multiculturalism. While Jackson and Adams shared the same basic worldview, such is no longer the case today. Modernism has changed all of that.

According to the dictionary, the term “modernism” can denote things that are happening in the present, that is, in modern times. It can also refer to a religious movement characterized by interpreting the Bible’s accounts of miracles in a “scientific” way. However, as a philosophical term, the word “Modernism” refers to a period of time in which scientists, philosophers, theologians, etc. sought to devise comprehensive systems of thought that would solve all of the world’s problems. Humanism, communism, existentialism, socialism, rationalism, empiricism, and a whole host of other “isms” were the product of this mentality. One by one, these different systems of thought took hold of various governments throughout the 18th and 19th centuries. The early 20th century witnessed the maturity of these various systems of thought in the two great World Wars and in the subsequent Cold War. The basic underlying philosophy of modernism, though, was that through man’s reason alone, a single system could be devised to solve all of the world’s problems.

By the middle of the 20th century, many were contemplating the shortcomings of modernism. The period of thought that produced the likes of Stalin and Hitler had obviously failed. All of the various philosophical systems that came out of that period were subjected to excruciating and rigorous evaluation under the deconstructive eyes of the postmodernists. Each humanly devised system was found by the postmodernists to be internally inconsistent—self-contradictory. Of course, the Bible had declared many years prior that the fundamental premise behind modernism would result in failure when Jeremiah opined, “O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps” (Jer. 10:23).

The postmodernists were not keen on seeking to replace these systems with any other, either, because to do so would admit the same fundamentally flawed assumption that the postmodernists had identified in modernism, namely, the notion that human reason could, in and of itself, develop a system to resolve all of man’s problems. Instead of turning to God to find the solution, postmodernists declared that pluralism/multiculturalism was the solution. Since there is no one solution, they reasoned, we must respect all solutions equally. (This really is just another humanly devised system of thought like the one fostered by the Modernists, a point which postmodernists have failed to divine.) Our day and time has witnessed the failure of multiculturalism as well, because when you regard all solutions and cultures as equal, the cultures seeking to impose their belief system on others through violence will prevail.

Unwilling to turn to God, postmodernists and multiculturalists continue to ply their thought system upon the American public. Like those in Jeremiah’s day, they have said to God, “We are lords; we will come no more to thee” (Jer. 2:31). Our current sitting president and his political party reflect this system. The effort to remove all traces of God from government and to embrace the notion that man is supreme has been seen in many areas of his administration such as his insistence that religious symbols be covered at speaking venues, and his employ of a humanistic slogan on his presidential carpet. In many ways his administration harks back to modernist times when secular ideologues like Marx, Lenin, and Stalin had their way. He has exercised unprecedented government control over private banking and manufacturing (via Central Planning), expanded government control over health care services to an unprecedented level, and returned the nation to a hapless welfare state where Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) cards (the modern way of getting food stamps) may be used (in some states) to purchase cigarettes and alcohol. In so doing he has incurred debt the likes of which the nation has never known.

He has sought to wage a Marxist-style class war against the “rich” by inflaming jealousy and covetousness among the “poor.” In truth, both the rich and poor will ultimately pay because as Margaret Thatcher famously said, “Eventually, you run out of other people’s money.” The bankruptcy problems that are occurring in cities like Stockton, California where Police and Firefighters cannot get gasoline for their vehicles and where the murder rate is higher than it has ever been are harbingers of what is on the horizon for our entire nation if this “hope and change” lasts much longer.

His moral policies reflect his secularism and multiculturalism. Not very long after his inauguration he issued an executive order to permit taxpayer money to fund abortions overseas, reversing the Mexico City Policy, and when his voter base clamored to permit homosexuals to serve openly in the military, he capitulated. He had to sign an executive order banning the use of tax-payer money for abortions after his health care bill was passed. Is such power within the hands of the Executive now instead of the Congress? More recently, he has come out to support same-sex marriages, reversing the stance that he took while campaigning in 2008.

The point here is not to tell anyone who to vote for, but primarily to show that a candidate’s worldview (whether good or ill) affects the decisions that he makes while in public office. Those who hold to a postmodernist and multicultural worldview are going to advance secular humanist-derived solutions to the challenges that each of us face in life. Under such a worldview, God-ordained solutions will not be given any consideration. Those who place God’s answers to life’s problems at the forefront will guide and govern based upon those beliefs. Desiring a government that “shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” is not the same as a government that purveys and promotes tax-payer funded secular-humanist principles and solutions. Liberty from secular-humanist government solutions permits God-ordained religion to function as it ought. In our upcoming political election, we should choose wisely considering not only what a candidate has said, but what he has done and the worldview that his words and actions reflect.

Posted in Kevin Cauley | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Conflicting Worldviews in Politics