Spoiled

Spoil Your Children… ?

One of the biggest problems facing the church today and our society as a whole is that we are raising up a generation of spoiled and unrestrained children. The children of today will be the ones leading our country and the church in the future. The future of the church in this country may not be very bright because sin and apostasy are the likely result of this lack of restraint.

Proverbs 13:24 teaches, “He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.” The rod Solomon referred to is not just simply a rod to spank the child with, (although that is often the case), the rod he referred to was the shepherd’s staff. This staff had many uses. It could be used a tool for defending the sheep. It could also be used to guide the sheep into the desired path. Moreover, it could be used to correct an errant sheep and bring him back into the fold.

In raising our children in the “nurture and admonition of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:4), we need to use the Word of God in conjunction with the rod of discipline. The child nurtured in the Bible and its teaching is given a measure of protection from the wiles of the devil because this child has been taught what God expects of him and how to deal with sin and temptation. The Word of God can be known and understood by a child, just as Paul reminded Timothy that, “from a child” he had “known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.” (2 Timothy 2:15). The Word of God is “…profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, and instruction in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16-17). When a child is raised with Biblical teaching, he is given a guide to keep him on the path of righteousness. “Through thy precepts I get understanding: therefore I hate every false way. Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path.” (Psalm 119:104-105). When a child strays from that path, Proverbs 13:24 teaches that the rod can also be used to mete out punishment.

Corporal punishment (i.e. spanking) is a good tool when used correctly. “Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die.” (Proverbs 23:13)  However, it must always be done with love as well as firmness. A loving parent who disciplines his child is not a contradiction. A “loving” parent who “spoils” his child is a contradiction. The Bible teaches that loving and spoiling are diametrically opposed to each other. Those who claim they love their children too much to punish them do not love them – God says they hate them.

Other related Proverbs:

Proverbs 22:15  Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him.

Proverbs 23:14  Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell.

Proverbs 29:15  The rod and reproof give wisdom: but a child left to himself bringeth his mother to shame.

Posted in Jack McNiel | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Spoiled

Decision, Difference, and Relationship

 The decisions that we make and the choices that we make in our lives will determine our progress in any endeavour we attempt. There are many choices in life to make while we live out our lives here in this world. Perhaps the greatest choice we make will deal with our relationship with God and with other Christians. The relationship that we sustain with God is a volunteer relationship and must be based upon our willingness to conform to God’s directions, “all of them; all the time.” Even the choices we make with regard to whether we will listen, understand, and conform to God’s instructions is a factor that will determine the kind of relationship we have with God – if we conform we will be happy, confident, and filled with the goodness of God toward everyone in all situations of life; but if we do not conform but develop a stubborn, self-righteousness, of our own, then we will not have the relationship with God that is rewarding and satisfactory – cf. Romans 10:1-3, “1 Brethren, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved. 2 For I bear them record that they have zeal of God, but not according to knowledge. 3 for they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.” (KJV)

The relationship that we sustain to brothers and sisters in Christ (i.e. in the congregation) is maintained out of our relationship with God and our willingness to hear, understand, and comply with instructions that relate to our joint responsibilities in that relationship – cf. 1 Corinthians 12:12-20, “12 For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body , being many, are one body : so also is Christ. 13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body , whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit. 14 for the body is not one member, but many. 15 If the foot shall say, because I am not the hand, I am not of the body; is it therefore not of the body? 16 And if the ear shall say, because I am not the eye, I am not of the body; is it therefore not of the body? 17 If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where were the smelling? 18 but now hath God set the members every one of them in the body, as it hath pleased him. 19 And if they were all one member, where were the body? 20 but now are they many members, yet but one body.” (KJV)

We cannot become a faction; we cannot become a unit within the congregation working against other Christians to accomplish some personal goal. Often within a congregation one may come to a conclusion that everything needs to change from the top to the bottom with the direction of the congregation. Whenever one puts into operation such a plan he/she must go outside the boundaries of sound doctrine to accomplish this evil plan. The matter of judgment is often flawed but the correcting of an action of flawed judgment is to be undertaken with the cooperation of the whole body of believers in that congregation, not a selection of individuals that agree with the premise (i.e. whether justified or not) in secret, away from the other members.

The desire for preeminence has always been a great hindrance to congregational growth and unity, – cf. 3 John 9, “I wrote unto the church: but Diotrephes, who loveth to have the preeminence among them, receiveth us not.” (KJV) perhaps it is unreasonable to seek the unity of everyone in any given area of local church function but it is the correct way to proceed with any problem (i.e. real or imaginary). To become a factional complainer, to seek to undo a program or a custom one must be very careful that thy do not sin in the process – cf. Ephesians 4:14-16, “14 That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive; 15 But speaking the truth in love , may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ: 16 From whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love.” (KJV)

Christians are to be a unit (i.e. unified) in their work for God. The problems in local work arise over customs, programs, and personal preferences that often become a point of contention among the members. Even when one disagrees with a program, he/she ought to maintain a disposition of love toward all brethren involved in the matter; including those that have initiated the custom, tradition, or program cf. 1 John 4:20-21, “20 If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen? 21 And this commandment have we from him, that he who loveth God love his brother also.” (KJV) A person may feel that he/she cannot love those that disagree with his/her position – this is not acceptable to God. A person must love his/her brethren.

Many problems in local congregations are always brought about by someone or as a result of some disagreement over a matter that the Bible does not address. This is true in most cases but there are cases where a violation of the Scriptures is at stake and someone in such a disagreement will loose their argument. AN EXAMPLE – If a dispute arises over the subject of baptism between members in a congregation; the subject may be settled by appealing to the passages in the Bible that address the matter of baptism.

ILLUSTRATION – If one claims that baptism is for remission of sins and the other contends that it is not; look at the verses in the New Testament that deal with baptism; such as; Acts 2:38, “Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.”

Romans 6:4, “Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.” (KJV)

Colossians 2:12, Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.” (KJV)

We can understand from these three passages of Scripture that one of the disputants is right and one of the disputants is wrong; we know that the Bible does not teach conflicting doctrine regarding baptism or for that matter any other subject.

The person who takes the wrong position regarding the purpose of baptism in the above situation is simply wrong – he/she cannot continue to support that false view and be acceptable to God – they must change to the correct position or become an outcast – Matthew 18:15-17, “15 Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. 16 But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established. 17 And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.” (KJV)

The maintenance of righteousness in any congregation falls under the elder’s duty. Most problems that have a scriptural solution (Number 2 this study) are solved by Scriptural Elders; therefore the solution to Scriptural based differences in any congregation must be solved under the oversight of the qualified elders as they point the person (s), involved in the dispute to the Bible based solution. This is the way that God intended for the congregation to function correctly and pursue unity. This is always the method for solving Bible based differences, “Consider the following:”

THE ELDER’S (i.e. Bishops, overseers, etc.) WORK: The elders at of the congregations in Judea:

Acts 11:27-30, “27 And in these days came prophets from Jerusalem unto Antioch.  28 And there stood up one of them named Agabus, and signified by the spirit that there should be great dearth throughout all the world: which came to pass in the days of Claudius Caesar. 29 Then the disciples, every man according to his ability, determined to send relief unto the brethren which dwelt in Judaea: 30 Which also they did, and sent it to the elders by the hands of Barnabas and Saul.” (KJV)

The false teachers come to Antioch of Syria and the solution of elders function:

Acts 15:2-6, “2 When therefore Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and disputation with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas, and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question. 3 And being brought on their way by the church, they passed through Phoenicia and Samaria, declaring the conversion of the Gentiles: and they caused great joy unto all the brethren. 4 And when they were come to Jerusalem, they were received of the church, and of the apostles and elders, and they declared all things that God had done with them. 5 but there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, that it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the Law of Moses. 6 And the apostles and elders came together for to consider of this matter.”

Acts 15:23-24, “23 And they wrote letters by them after this manner; The apostles and elders and brethren send greeting unto the brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia: 24 Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no such commandment:” (KJV)

SOME EXAMPLES WHERE THE ELDER’S FUNCTION (i.e. Necessary Inference):

Jerusalem – Acts 6:1-5, “1 And in those days, when the number of the disciples was multiplied, there arose a murmuring of the Grecians against the Hebrews, because their widows were neglected in the daily ministration. 2 Then the twelve called the multitude of the disciples unto them, and said, it is not reason that we should leave the word of God, and serve tables. 3 Wherefore, brethren, look ye out among you seven men of honest report, full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom, which we may appoint over this business. 4 But we will give ourselves continually to prayer, and to the ministry of the word. 5 And the saying pleased the whole multitude: and they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Ghost, and Philip, and Prochorus, and Nicanor, and Timon, and Parmenas, and Nicolas a proselyte of Antioch:” (KJV)

Corinth – 1 Cor 5:1-9, “1 It is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his father’s wife. 2 And ye are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he that hath done this deed might be taken away from among you. 3 For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have judged already, as though I were present, concerning him that hath so done this deed, 4 In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, 5 To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. 6 Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? 7 Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us: 8 therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. 9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators:” (KJV)

The false teacher or one who refuses to accept the truth (i.e. the heretic) – Titus 3:8-11, “8 this is a faithful saying, and these things I will that thou affirm constantly, that they which have believed in God might be careful to maintain good works. These things are good and profitable unto men.9 but avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain. 10 A man that is an heretic after the first and second admonition reject; 11 Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.” (KJV)

Yet, whenever one of the disputants rejects the elders solution (i.e. based on proper interpretation) to the problem; the church has no recourse but to initiate discipline to the rebellious member. — Number 3:3

CONCLUSION: Now, it is never right to do something wrong to correct something that one has done. Often in life we consider correcting some wrong by doing something else that is wrong – Example: Many times in life thus far; I have read or heard of people who commit murder for revenge. The person who seeks to right a wrong done to himself or a family member by killing the person who has done the offence to him or his loved ones is not the correct process to settle wrongs done to self under any circumstance.

The Bible is clear on this point as well as on the subject of all wrongs that the Christian will suffer in life; please observe the following Biblical references regarding this point in our concluding thoughts:

Matt 5:21, Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shall not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment: {KJV}

Mark 10:19, Thou knowest the commandments, do not commit adultery, do not kill, and do not steal, do not bear false witness, Defraud not, Honor thy father and mother. {KJV}

Rom 13:9-10, 9 for this, Thou shall not commit adultery, Thou shall not kill, Thou shall not steal, Thou shall not bear false witness, Thou shall not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shall love thy neighbor as thyself. 10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbor: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law. {KJV}

James 2:11, For he that said, do not commit adultery, said also, do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law. {KJV}

James 4:1-7, 1 From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? 2 Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not. 3 Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts. 4 Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God. 5 Do ye think that the scripture saith in vain, The spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy? 6 But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble. 7 Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you. {KJV}

Posted in Garreth L. Clair | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Decision, Difference, and Relationship

There’s Only One

In Ephesians chapter four the apostle Paul is addressing a real problem that existed in the church of the first century. The problem was division among the brethren. As it was with his letter to the Corinthian church he wanted the Christians to be united. He encouraged them to endeavor “to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (v 3). We do this, he says, by walking worthy of the calling with which we were called “with all lowliness and gentleness, with long suffering, bearing with one another in love” (vv 1-2).

Sure, they all had different individual callings but they were to be used together for the edification of the whole church, not just for individual glory and honor. The goal was unity, maturity and steadfastness. The church was meant to be a group of individuals “called out” of this world to supply love, strength and encouragement to all the other “called out” (vv 11-16).

However, in verses 4-6 Paul speaks of some things in which we have no freedom as Christians to our own personal ideas, interpretations, or indulgence. Some contend that these things Paul speaks of are so unique in nature that there cannot be another (real or imagined); while others teach that these things (more or less) are open to individual interpretation and live in accordance to his ideal. But what exactly is the apostle Paul saying here? He says there is:

One Body – Are there not many different bodies? Yes. But there is only one body that belongs to Christ and to which true Christians are added. Since the church of Christ and the body are one and the same thing (Eph 1:22-23; Col 1:18; Eph 5:23) and since there are many different denominational bodies that claim Christ as their head what is Paul talking about? The one “true” body belongs to Christ (Col 2:17) and every other, while it may claim to be His (and is indeed a body of some type), is not the one “true” body. 1 Corinthians 12 is a great study of this subject.

One Spirit – While the Bible speaks of many different “spirits” (i.e. spirit of an unclean devil, spirit of infirmity, spirit of bondage, spirit of adoption, spirit of slumber, spirit of the world, spirit of your mind, spirit of fear, spirit of antichrist, spirit of error) there is only one true Spirit from above that is able to teach us and guide us to heaven. And while most of the spirits spoken of throughout scripture are those that come from the world and individual selfishness, many claim that these spirits are the one “true” spirit.

One Hope – Do people place their hopes and dreams on many things that the true Christian recognizes as being hopeless dreams? There are many hopes that men have but only one that will result in what we really want and need (Rom 8:24).

One Lord – Do people serve many different lords? Do people call on lords to save them? The world is filled with idolatry, service, and worship to lords that cannot save. Paul means here that there is one “true” Lord in whom we have hope. Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me” (John 14:6). He even spoke of those who would call Him Lord but not obey Him (Matt 7:21-23; Luke 6:46).

One Faith – How many faiths are there? The dictionary defines faith as “complete trust or confidence in someone or something.” The Greek word means to have a “persuasion” or “conviction.” The Muslim has a faith; so does the Buddhist, the Jew, the Hindu, the Spiritualist, the humanist, the Atheist, the Deist, the Pantheist and so on. So what does Paul mean here? There is only one “true, saving” faith (Rom 1:5)!

One Baptism – Are there and have there been many baptisms? The Bible speaks of no less than seven (i.e. John, Jesus, Fire, Moses, Cross, Holy Spirit, for the remission of sins). While there was a time when all these baptism were valid and had a purpose by the time of Paul’s epistle to the church at Ephesus there was only one valid baptism and it was the one that would save them (Mark 16:16; Acts 2:38-40; Acts 19:1-5; 1 Pet 3:21).

One God and Father of All – Here is the culminating statement! For the Christians at Ephesus they needed to remember that their heavenly Father was the one true and living God (1 Thess 1:9). He was above all, through all and in them all. So they needed to be united on these truths and work together for edification and eternal life.

Aren’t you glad there are no divisions among us today? Oh yeah, right! Why are there divisions among us today? Because people are following or are a part of many different bodies, spirits, hopes, lords, faiths, baptisms, and gods. Let us take a moment for honest introspection and ask ourselves who are we serving, what do we believe, is it helping to unify the brethren, am I contributing to the edification of the saints? Am I on the right path to heaven? Think about it!

Posted in Tim Dooley | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on There’s Only One

How to Rightly Divide the Word

We are commanded to rightly divide the Word of God (2 Timothy 2:15). Today, much confusion and all false religions are based on the failure to divide the Word correctly. Therefore, instead of looking within ourselves or looking to some scholar as to how to divide the Word, since God has given us all things that pertain to life and godliness (2 Peter 1:3), we should seek the wisdom of God.

Now, there are many Bible references that teach us how to rightly divide the Word. But, one chapter especially needs to be read and studied above all, which is Galatians 3. This chapter gives the right divisions of the Word based on the three grand divisions of the Bible commonly called Patriarchal, Jewish, and Christian Dispensations. These divisions are Scripturally known as the promises, the law, and the Gospel. The promises were made to Abraham 430 years before the Law of Moses came into existence. This law was “added because of transgression” (Galatians 3:19) until Christ should come with the
Gospel to fulfill the promise to Abraham.

Now, the Law of Moses was not added to the promise which God made to Abraham. The Bible says it came in besides, meaning, between the promise and its fulfillment (Galatians 3:23). This promise was that Christ, the seed of Abraham, should come, and
through Him all nations would be blessed (Galatians 3:8-14, 17, 19). Now, since the Law of Moses was added only until the seed should come, and the description of that seed is, “which is Christ” (Galatians 3:16), it follows that the Law of Moses automatically ended with the coming of Christ. The apostle wrote, “Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor.” (Galatians 3:24-25). The “us” as referred to there are the Jews.

In Galatians 3, when read and studied, it will make clear the right divisions of the Word of God, unless one stubbornly refuses to see. With this plain and proper division of the Word, Paul in numerous other references affirms the official cancellation of the Law of Moses. Some of the references in which Paul affirms the cancellation of the Law of Moses are as follows:

1. “We are not under the law” (Romans 10:4).
2. We are dead to the law and delivered from it (Romans 7:6).
3. Jesus Christ is the end of the Law of Moses (Colossians 2:14-16).

How much clearer could language be to prove to all mankind that no one is under the Law of Moses today? All who want to be saved today, are subject to the Gospel conditions of salvation which is only found in Christ (Acts 4:12). Thus, the Great Commission, recorded in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John is the key to understanding the preaching of the apostles in the book of Acts.

Posted in Robert Notgrass | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on How to Rightly Divide the Word

Eliminate 90% of the Human Race?

Eliminate 90% of the Human Race?

In elementary schools, it often begins with a crush. During the rebellious years of high school, we try to act as if we dislike all of them—even though we still have our favorites. Then, in college, we respect them for their education, and in graduate or professional school our respect oftentimes turns into loyal admiration. Most of us can look back through our educational years and remember teachers who really stood out—teachers that made a difference in our lives. These are the ones who made an imprint on us—and as such, we often pattern our own values, beliefs, and ideology accordingly.

That’s all well and good when teachers maintain integrity and adhere to a strong moral code. But what happens when students worship a professor who suggests that we humans are no better than bacteria? And that the world would be a better place if we had an airborne version of Ebola that would wipe out 90% of the human population—a virtual holocaust to cleanse the Earth? To make matters worse, what message are we sending when we designate such a man as the “2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist?”

What does it take to earn the title of “Distinguished Texas Scientist”? Well, obviously, it does not hurt to do research in Texas. But since when is suggesting the human race needed to be wiped out a good thing? This is precisely what Dr. Eric Pianka did at the 109th meeting of the Texas Academy of Science at Lamar University in Beaumont, Texas. The meeting, held March 3-5, 2006, honored Pianka, an evolutionary ecologist and lizard expert, as the 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist.

In describing the event, attendee Forrest Mims observed:

Something curious occurred a minute before Pianka began speaking. An official of the Academy approached a video camera operator at the front of the auditorium and engaged him in animated conversation. The camera operator did not look pleased as he pointed the lens of the big camera to the ceiling and slowly walked away. This curious incident came to mind a few minutes later when Professor Pianka began his speech by explaining that the general public is not yet ready to hear what he was about to tell us. Because of many years of experience as a writer and editor, Pianka’s strange introduction and the TV camera incident raised a red flag in my mind. Suddenly I forgot that I was a member of the Texas Academy of Science and chairman of its Environmental Science Section. Instead, I grabbed a notepad so I could take on the role of science reporter (2006).

In his recounting of the wicked speech, Mims noted that one of the first planks Pianka laid was that humans were no better than animals. Recounting the story of a neighbor who questioned his interest in lizards, Pianka responded: “What good are you?” He then felt compelled to announce: “We are no better than bacteria!” (Mims, 2006).

From there, the speech took a decisively wicked turn, as Pianka insisted the Earth would not be able to sustain life without drastic measures. He proposed the only solution was to eliminate most of the world’s population. Reflecting back on the conference, Mims noted:

Then, and without presenting any data to justify this number, he asserted that the only feasible solution to saving the Earth is to reduce the population to 10 percent of the present number. He then showed solutions for reducing the world’s population in the form of a slide depicting the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. War and famine would not do, he explained. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population crisis is to be solved (2006, emp. added).

If Pianka’s words do not send chills up your spine you need to check your pulse. How does it feel knowing that this man is idolized, to the point that one of his students was heard to say, “I worship Dr. Pianka” (Mims, 2006). One wonders how many young graduate students currently enrolled at various universities “worship” this man and would be more than willing to work on creating an airborne strain of Ebola.

One of the saddest parts of this story was the audiences’ reaction. Instead of being outraged or standing up against Pianka, his own colleagues gave him a standing ovation. Mims observed:

When Pianka finished his remarks, the audience applauded. It wasn’t merely a smattering of polite clapping that audiences diplomatically reserve for poor or boring speakers. It was a loud, vigorous and enthusiastic applause (Mims, 2006).

This account should be a sobering reminder as to why there should be restraints on scientific research. Most scientists do not want any restrictions on their research, and in many cases their research has out-paced ethical laws. They contend that they should be a “self-governing body,” and yet we find them giving a standing ovation to a man who suggests that “billions must soon die” in order to solve the “population crisis.” In an article titled “Scientists Cheer Holocaust Wish,” the World Net Daily noted:

During a question-and-answer session, the audience laughed approvingly when Pianka offered the bird flu as another vehicle toward achieving his goal. They also chuckled when he suggested it was time to sterilize everyone on Earth. “What kind of reception have you received as you have presented these ideas to other audiences that are not representative of us?” asked one member of the audience. “I speak to the converted!” Pianka replied (see “Scientists Cheer…,” 2006).

Converted from what? Sanity?! Here is a man who is willing to press atheistic evolution to its logical conclusion. This is the same man who approves of the Chinese “one-child” policy and proclaimed that smarter people have fewer kids. As a society we must quickly acknowledge the fact that our children and grandchildren are placing many professors on pedestals. It’s time we hold those professors accountable for the seeds they are planting in the hearts and minds of our young people.

REFERENCES

“Scientists Cheer Holocaust Wish” (2006), World Net Daily, [On-line], URL: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49555.

Mims, Forrest (2006), “Meeting Doctor Doom,” The Citizen Scientist, [On-line], URL: http://www.sas.org/tcs/weeklyIssues_2006/2006-04-07/feature1p/index.html.

Copyright © 2006 Apologetics Press, Inc. All rights reserved.

http://www.apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=9&article=1821

Posted in Brad Harrub | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Eliminate 90% of the Human Race?