What is Necessary?

One Thing is Necessary

Distractions.  I was talking about this tonight in Bible class.  We all have distractions that we have to deal with.  I’m thinking about little things that we do on a daily basis that tend to take us in the opposite direction of God.

When our family moved to Mississippi, we didn’t like the cable provider and so we just cancelled it.  I missed an entire football season–college and professional.  Or perhaps I should say that I didn’t miss it at all.  I found that my life was enriched enough without it.  I now like the idea that we don’t have cable television.  It is one less distraction.

We could do without many other things as well, but we hang onto them thinking that we really need them, when in fact, we really do not.  The truth is that we can survive just fine without such things, and there are many people in the world who do a great deal of surviving without all of the luxuries–yes, let’s call them what they really are–that we have.

In Bible class we opened to Hebrews 13:5, “Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.”  Someone referenced the “rich fool” of Luke 12:20.  We remembered that Jesus said in verse 15, “Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man’s life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth.”  Then we turned to 1 Timothy 6:8: “And having food and raiment let us be therewith content.”  This prompted me to have an imaginary conversation.

I wonder what is on God’s shopping list for me today:

  1. Food
  2. Raiment

That’s a pretty short list, Lord.  Are you sure I can’t add some BlueRays and CDs to that? What about that latest digital camera?  Let me look at that list again:

  1. Food
  2. Raiment

Nope, hasn’t changed.

And this is how we develop anxiety: by desiring things that cannot satisfy, pretending that we own something, and gradually replacing God with stuff until we are spending so much time managing these things that God is no longer in our life.  Our life becomes about maintaining stuff, and we become anxious when such stuff is threatened.

What are our motivations for such living?  The answer is really simple: the flesh.  The flesh is what motivates us to seek such things because the flesh is selfish.  The flesh desires what it lacks because that is what it does; it seeks to perpetuate itself.  Our spirits, however, are not nourished by such behavior, but rather, starved.

Listen to what Paul says in Galatians 5:17: “For the flesh lusteth against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.”  The spirit desires certain outcomes, but the flesh seems to always get in the way to thwart the spirit’s plans.  This is why in verse 24 of the same chapter, Paul writes, “And they that are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.”  If we want the spirit to succeed, we must crucify the flesh.

“Affections” is an interesting word here.  The Greek word is pathema (πάθημα).  It means that which one suffers or has suffered.  It is often translated “passions.”  ”Affections” are what we give to the things for which we are willing to suffer.  In other words, we suffer with, put up with, endure the things that we love the most.  When what we love the most is God, then our suffering with and for God separates us from things other than God.  When that which we love the most is something other than God, then such sufferings separate us from God.  Our passion must be God.

Nevertheless, feed the flesh; starve the spirit.  Starve the flesh; feed the spirit.  It really is an either/or proposition.  ”No man can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon” (Matthew 6:24).

“So you’re telling me that it is a sin to buy a DVD?”  Well, it could be.  It depends on why you are buying it and what you are using it for.  If one is using it to gratify that flesh, it is a sin.  This has profound implications, because it means that there are a whole slew of “innocent” things that are wrong if I am using them to gratify the flesh.

I’ll throw in another wrinkle.  My intentions could even be right, and yet I could be wrong if I am rationalizing the gratification of the flesh with my good intentions.  I’ve heard that good intentions make good pavement, but not in the right direction.

This all brings me back to what Jesus said to Martha in Luke 10:41-42, ”Martha, Martha, you are anxious and troubled about many things, but one thing is necessary. Mary has chosen the good portion, which will not be taken away from her.”

One thing is necessary.  Martha had anxiety, trouble!  Why?  Wasn’t she serving?  Wasn’t she helping?  Wasn’t she doing?  Her very “service” had become her god.

One thing is necessary.  What was necessary?  Studying?  Hearing?  Learning?  Following?  Serving?  Working?  Evangelizing?  Preaching?  Even these can become false gods if we assign value to them unassigned by God.

One thing is necessary.  What did Mary choose?  She chose Jesus.  He is the one thing that is necessary.  She chose the good portion because she chose the Lord.

“‘The Lord is my portion,’ says my soul.  ’Therefore I will hope in Him’” (Lamentations 3:24).

God alone is necessary.

Posted in Kevin Cauley | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on What is Necessary?

John 9 – Healing

The healing of the blind man and the conversations that result from it illustrates vividly the difference between a growing faith in the healed person and a hardening attitude of unbelief of “the Jews.” So, as Jesus was still in Jerusalem with His disciples, this healing of the man is the 6th miracle recorded in John. And so in vs. 1-6, Jesus saw a man who had been blind from birth. But evidentially, the Jews did not learn from Job that even the righteous suffer. They still believed that any misfortune was the work of sin. But, in vs. 3-5, Jesus told the disciples that his blindness was not caused by sin, but that it would be an occasion to display “the works of God.”

Now, as the Lord took the opportunity to heal him, he did something strange. In vs. 6-7, He spat on the ground and made clay to place on the blind man’s eyes. He then commanded Him to go to the Pool of Siloam to wash off the clay. And so, when the blind man did as commanded, he saw for the first time in his life. And, those who lived near the blind man became confounded by the fact that he now had his eye sight when they knew he had been blind. Imagine that you knew a person who was blind all their life and in one instance, he can see. This must have caused excitement and joy in the neighborhood. But, there was some who thought that the one claiming they were healed was just a man who looked like the blind man (vs. 8-9). But, the man answered their question of his healing by saying that the man called Jesus had commanded him to wash off the clay in the Pool of Siloam and, when he did, he could see. When they asked where Jesus was, the man did not know. Strangely, Jesus disappeared and then showed up at the end of the chapter.

Now of course with this allegation of healing, the Pharisees have to stick their nose in the business of God and investigate things (vs. 13-17). And, the next three paragraphs we see the synagogue and the Pharisees doing their thing. Now, we don’t know how the blind man got to the Pharisees. It could have been via all the excitement surrounding him and to give glory to God for the miracle. But the Jews had protested the healing of the lame man and his carrying his pallet on the Sabbath (Jn. 5:9-16; 7:23). So, they had objected to Jesus healing the man and completely missed the point. So, the Pharisees interrogated the man about the healing and they repeatedly asked him (vs. 15) how he was healed as if, they would not believe the truth if it bit them! And, the Pharisees said that Jesus could not be God and not keep the Sabbath (vs. 16). Certainly there was no indication from the Law of Moses that healing broke any Sabbath law. Others of their number were not convinced and asked how a sinner could perform such signs? This caused a division among them. And what is really strange is that the Pharisees asked the opinion of the blind man to settle things. But no answer was given to satisfy them all.

So, in vs. 18-23, they bring in the healed man’s parents to question them thinking that this would settle all things and that all the story would be revealed about the man’s blindness. Well, the way the Pharisees asked their questions was not really done to get more information, but to confront the parents if their son was born blind or not. In vs. 20-23, the parents affirmed that it was indeed their son who was born blind but now sees. However, they were afraid to proclaim faith in Jesus because of the Jews. So, the parents said, “Ask him, he is of age.” Today, we call this “passin the buck.” But, anyone confessing Jesus to be the Christ would be excommunicated from the synagogue and the parents did not want that to happen to them. So, ask the son.

Well, the Pharisees interrogated the healed man again (vs. 24-34). Imagine the courage it must have taken for this man to stand there again. So, the Jews were trying desperately to nullify the effects of the miracle of healing the blind man. They accused Jesus of being a sinner for violating the Sabbath and they reluctantly acknowledge that the man has been healed by their statement: “Give glory to God.” Well, the healed man did not know if Jesus was a sinner, but he did know one thing, “Whereas I was blind, now I see!” (vs. 25). Shockingly, the Jews were desperately attempting to cause the man to deny his own experience. And, being not convinced, they asked again (vs. 26-27) and began to abuse this man with their words (vs. 28- 29). They accuse him of being a disciple of Jesus. The Jews were Moses’ disciples, but they knew not Jesus where Jesus came from and were blinded in their ideas of the Messiah.

Well, the formerly blind man thought it remarkable that they did not acknowledge that Jesus was from God since He had healed him. He stated that God does not hear sinners, He only hears God-fearing men. His statement is technically correct. God does hear those who are truly seeking Him. Cornelius is an example of one who was still a sinner but whose prayers were heard and answered by God. But, the healed man affirmed that Jesus could not have healed him if He was not from God. Well, this did not sit well with the Jews in that they accused him of being a sinner from birth and they expelled him from the synagogue (vs. 34). Temper . . . temper.

It is something that the Jews were so blind and ignoring the genuineness of the once blind man. How could the Jews be so blind? Still, in vs. 35-41, it bring the verdict of judgment upon those spiritually blind leaders of the synagogue and at the same time, it confirms the fact that now the man can not only see with his physical eyes, but that he has spiritual sight as well. In vs. 36, Jesus heard that the man had been kicked out of the synangogue. And so, he find the man and ask him if he believes in the Son of God and the man asked, who is he? And, you have to love how Jesus answers this. He states in vs. 37 that you have both seen Him, and He is the One you are talking to. I wonder what facial expressions the man would have made when he recognized Jesus as the One. Thus, he worshipped Him.

In vs. 39, Jesus said that this was the judgment in that the physical blind can not see, including spiritual things. But, the spiritual cannot see them. Well, the Pharisees who heard this statement asked if they were blind too? It is obvious they were since they rejected the Lord. But, Jesus said, “if ye were blind, ye should have no more sin: but now ye say, We see; therefore, your sin remaineth” (vs. 41). Jesus told them that because they claimed to see their sin remained upon them: the sin of rejecting God’s Son. You know, the sad reality is not that sin cuts a person off from what Jesus wants to give, but it is the illusion that one can live without Jesus as the light of their world. May God allow us to always see Him.

Posted in Robert Notgrass | Tagged , , | Comments Off on John 9 – Healing

Read and Understand

“Therefore do not be unwise, but understand what the will of the Lord is” (Eph. 5:17).

In a world where there is so much religious confusion, and where there are so many different ways people attempt to worship God, the Bible still demands that we, “understand what the will of the Lord is.”  What this implies is not only CAN we understand the will of God, but also that we MUST understand it.  And one who fails to do this is deemed “unwise.”

But how is this pursuit to understand accomplished? Paul tells us that “faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God” (Rom. 10:17).  You see it is through the message of the “once for all” recorded gospel (Jude 3), the all-sufficient word of God (2 Pet. 1:3), that one is able to come to an understanding of the will of God (2 Tim. 3:15).  If you seek, you will find (Matt. 7:7-8; cf. 2 Tim. 2:7; 1 Thess. 2:13).  And while it is true that the infallible word of God is to be preached and taught by sound Christians whose message is founded solely upon the Holy Scriptures (1 Tim. 4:16; 1 Pet. 4:11), it is also true that we “hear” the will of God through a careful reading of those Holy Scriptures.  In fact, Paul indicates that we are to READ and UNDERSTAND (2 Cor. 1:13; Eph. 3:4; cf. Acts 15:31; Col. 4:16; 1 Thess. 5:27).

It’s sad that there are those who “shut up the kingdom of heaven against men” (Matt. 23:13) by discouraging others from reading the Bible for themselves.  On the contrary, Paul stresses that one must carefully and faithfully study the word of God or one will not be able to come to a proper understanding of it (2 Tim. 2:15; cf. Acts 17:11).

Friends, please read and understand.

Posted in Aaron Veyon | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Read and Understand

Big Bang

Big Bang Proof Found?

Is it a coincidence that several movies are hitting theaters with religious themes (e.g., Son of God, God’s Not Dead, Noah, Irreplaceable) and the evolutionary propaganda machine is at full throttle? I think not.

Individuals who believe in God are suddenly finding several movies at local theaters that give them hope and do not castigate Christians as ignorant buffoons. So what is the response of those who have held the atheistic microphone for years? Stifle the momentum! Suddenly, we have “proof” for the Big Bang theory. In fact, some in the mainstream media are suggesting this latest proof demands it is no longer a theory. In other words: “Back in your closet Christians—don’t come out and share your beliefs with the world. There is no God—we are the result of a cosmic explosion.”

However, before you lose hope and give up the fight, you might be interested to know this is not the first time the evolutionary propaganda machine has announced such evidence—and it won’t be the last time. Not everyone is buying this latest announcement.

Creation Evolution Headlines has an excellent review in which they pointed out:

“What really happened is that a team with a sensitive detector dubbed BICEP2 in Antarctica found (they claim) some signals of B-mode polarization in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) – a very weak signal that leans on various models and the ability to identify noise to subtract out. They are interpreting swirls on a chart as evidence of gravitational waves (extremely weak and difficult to detect), which they infer were caused by inflation after the big bang, since producing those artifacts would have required very high energy according to theory. They believe they have ruled out foreground artifacts that might have distorted the signal, but that remains to be confirmed.”

Science reporters are going nuts with the announcement simultaneously (showing they are all in cahoots with embargoed news, like horses ready to charge out of the racing gates; this BICEP2 study has been going on for years). Space.com, in particular, is finding creative ways to capitalize on the “spectacular” announcement with advertisement-cluttered video clips, interviews, photo galleries and infographics, obviously prepared in advance for the big publication day.

The ironic thing is none of the big announcements touch on the major problems of the Big Bang. Where did the matter come from for the Big Bang? Who or what pulled the trigger? How does science explain the suspension of so many “laws” of science? Instead they seem to relish in the idea of espousing the Big Bang is no longer a theory—but rather a “fact.”

CEH continues:

“Deeper reading shows it might be appropriate to hold the horses.

First of all, the experiments are highly theory-laden. It’s a bit like reasoning, “Major premise: If space aliens visited Mars, they would have left faces. Minor premise: a face has been found on Mars. Conclusion: Space aliens visited Mars.” Only if cosmologists assume certain things about what inflation might do to the cosmic microwave background can they claim inflation caused what they think they see. This signal, for instance, would have had to be imprinted on spacetime almost half a billion years before the CMB became visible. Confirmation bias is a common problem in science and in everyday life (that’s why Karl Popper proposed falsification as a criterion for science.)

Second, the data are extremely tenuous. Gravitational waves are notoriously weak. Additional support may come from data now being crunched by the ESA’s Planck telescope’s team. But again, interpretations of the reduced data set after signals considered uninformative are tossed out are not free of theory bias. The team is claiming, nonetheless, that the signal is stronger than expected.

Third, even the “discoverers” of the ripples admit it is premature to conclude their favored interpretation (inflation) is correct.”

In other words, these researchers are seeing what they want to see. This is expected from individuals precommitted to ruling out the possibility of God. How many times has an announcement like this one seen a quiet retraction or “correction” months later that is never picked up by the mainstream media? I suspect this will be the case with this latest announcement as well. In fact, Answers in Genesis’ Dr. Danny Faulkner points out that this is the third time that cosmic inflation has been reported, and both times previously the reports were proven to be false, including a claim just last year.

Big news? Not exactly. Big speculation and presupposition would be a better title. At the end of the day Christians should have hope. The very existence of the universe continues to declare the handiwork of an all-powerful God.

Sources: “Has Cosmic Inflation Been Discovered?” Creation Evolution Headlines, Web, http://crev.info/2014/03/has-cosmic-inflation-been-discovered/, 17 March 2014.

Dr. Danny Faulkner, “Has Cosmic Inflation Been Proved?” Answers in Genesis, Web, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2014/03/17/has-cosmic-inflation-been-proved, 17 March 2014.

Posted in Brad Harrub | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Big Bang

God Desires Fellowship

When we look at the religious world at large, many people are confused about religion and Christianity in general. Nevertheless, when we seek counsel from the inspired, revealed will of God, we actually see the desire of our Creator to have fellowship with the crown of His creation—this is the design of God for true religion.

Beginning with the first created man, God desired fellowship with him (Gen. 1:28-31; 2:9, 18). Everything God did for Adam was for having his best interest at heart. Thus, God and man were in perfect fellowship together. Yet, we see that wonderful fellowship broken in Genesis 3:8 with the entrance of sin. Since sin had broken this bond of fellowship, God cast humanity out of the Garden of Eden and away from the tree of life (Gen. 3:22-24). The presence of sin has affected the wonderful fellowship that once existed. Nevertheless, because of the grace of God and His desire to fellowship man, He made a way for man to have a limited amount of fellowship with Him—divinely prescribed worship, beginning with Genesis 4 and the sacrifice of Abel.

Later, we again see this design of God to fellowship His beloved with the construction of a tabernacle, and later, with the temple. As God was leading His children out of Egypt and towards the Promised Land, He gave instructions for the assembly of a tabernacle to Moses. The entire design and purpose of such was for the people of God to approach His presence in fellowship through priesthood and sacrifices: “Then a cloud covered the tent of the congregation, and the glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle” (Exod. 40:34).

Just as we see God fellowshipping with Moses throughout the wilderness journey, we see God fellowshipping with Joshua, his successor: “…as I was with Moses, so I will be with thee: I will not fail thee, nor forsake thee…for the Lord thy God is with thee whithersoever thou goest” (Josh. 1:5, 9).

Hundreds of years later, we see God fulfilling His ultimate plan of redemption by coming down to earth in the form of a man (Phil. 2:5-7; John 1:14). Jesus came to become a sin offering for us, but through such, made it possible for man to have that wonderful fellowship with God: “…they shall call his name Immanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us” (Matt. 1:23). This is fellowship!

Before Jesus departed, He left us His desire for God to have fellowship with His creation:

Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me. In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also. And whither I go ye know, and the way ye know. (John 14:1-4)

Therefore, the way to have fellowship with God is through Jesus (John 14:6) and through our obedience to Him (Heb. 5:8-9).

Posted in Sam Willcut | Tagged , , | Comments Off on God Desires Fellowship