Adultery and Fornication

Avoiding Adultery and Fornication

Adultery

Adultery is a Sin Against God.

The sin of adultery and fornication is quite prominent in our society today. The media has desensitized its effects by glamorizing it and renaming it into a less harmful word, as an “affair.” Yet, no matter what man may say, God has never changed His feelings about the subject; He still knows the damage and destruction that it causes within families. Thus, Christians should be people with a disposition to avoid such a strong and dan­gerous temptation. Thanks be unto our God that He has revealed unto us a wonderful example of such in virtuous Joseph (Gen. 39). By the providence of God (Gen. 39:2-3), Joseph was a slave in the house of Po­tiphar, an Egyptian officer of Pharaoh. In fact, be­cause of the righteous living exemplified by Joseph, Potiphar elevated Joseph to oversee his entire house (Gen. 39:4), giving him a level of responsibility un­heard of at that time (Gen. 39:6). Yet, Potiphar’s wife noticed that Joseph was a handsome man [the phrase “a goodly person, and well favored” (Gen. 39:6) in the Hebrew denotes his physical attractiveness]. Consequently, when one becomes prominent and is good looking, people take notice, and she was among the first in line for Joseph. She tempts his purity by offering herself (Gen. 39:7), but he refuses. His re­sponse and actions thereafter give a wonderful pat­tern in how to avoid adultery and fornication.

First, Joseph recognized her for who she re­ally was—“his master’s wife” (Gen. 39:7-8). Thus, he would respond to her in reference to her husband, Potiphar: “…thou art his wife” (Gen. 39:9). Joseph knew that she did not belong to him. He knew that because Potiphar was married, he had no rights whatsoever to become involved in “a fling,” “an af­fair” or whatever anyone might want to designate. In the heart of Joseph, she was off-limits. He knew, believed, appreciated and obeyed the matrimonial principle that would later become a foundational ba­sis for Israel from God: “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife” (Exod. 20:17). When marriage es­tablishes a man and woman together with God (cf. Gen. 2:24), there is no room for anyone else.

Second, Joseph recognized that Potiphar kept back his wife from him (Gen. 39:8-9). When Potiphar promoted Joseph to be responsible for overseeing his house, he knew that did not include liberties with his wife: “There is none greater in this house than I; neither hath he kept back any thing from me but thee” (Gen. 39:9). Joseph clearly understood that Po­tiphar kept back his wife from Joseph. What a great principle! Husbands need to keep back their wives from others, and wives need to keep back their hus­bands from others. If spouses would work more in such ways, there would be less cases of adultery and fornication, and consequently, less divorce. Spouses need to keep back their mates by continually reaf­firming their love, devotion and loyalty to each other. Spouses need to keep back their mates by assuring that each are dressing modestly in public.

Third, when Joseph initially recognized the temptation, he did everything he could to avoid such (Gen. 39:10). While she did not relent, but kept tempt­ing him daily, he not only verbally refused, but also even made every effort not “to be with her.” It was only when she seized an opportunity when no men were around that she persisted further by grabbing his garment, only to find herself holding an empty gar­ment in hand as he ran away. He exemplified what we find in the New Testament: “Flee fornication” (1 Cor. 6:18). “Flee also youthful lusts: but follow righteous­ness, faith, charity, peace, with them that call on the Lord out of a pure heart” (2 Tim. 2:22). When temp­tations of such happen, Christians who value purity will immediately seek to avoid all such encounters. When coworkers make advances, we should avoid such people to the greatest extent possible.

If we will seek to follow the guidelines that Joseph demonstrated, we may protect our marriages and homes, and adultery and fornication will only be a problem in the world where people do not respect divine matrimonial laws.

Posted in Sam Willcut | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Adultery and Fornication

Guilty! What do you say?

What Can You Say When You Are Guilty?

Joseph’s brothers were in dire circumstances when they stood with Benjamin and were questioned by the most powerful man in Egypt (Gen. 41:40-42). This was not the first time they had been there to buy grain. The first time, they left and all their money was given back to them and hidden in their sacks of grain. This time, when they left and opened their sacks, they again found their money but also the royal cup of Joseph had been placed in Benjamin’s sack.

They were guilty and stood helpless before Joseph. Judah was the spokesman, but he had no defense. He said, “What shall we say to my lord? What shall we speak? Or how shall we clear ourselves” (Gen. 44:16)? Their guilt was obvious to the ruler, Joseph, and it was obvious to them. What defense can there be? Hear his words, “What shall we say?”

These same words were spoken by Ezra who was part of the restoring of Israel after their seventy years in Babylon. The temple had been rebuilt by Zerubbabel, and with the return of Ezra, the priest, the people focused even more on living according to what God taught. The leaders came to Ezra and spoke of the unlawful marriages the Jews had made with the pagans. They said, “The holy seed is mixed with the people of those lands.” When Ezra heard of this he tore his garments and literally pulled hairs from his head and his beard in despair. At the time of the evening sacrifice, he fell on his knees before God and spread out his hands.

In his prayer he confessed their sins. They were guilty and stood before the holy God as sinful men. Ezra said, “O our God, what shall we say after this? For we have forsaken Your commandments” (Ezra 9:10). God knew they were guilty. They knew they were guilty. The words of the priest sum it all up—what shall we say?

These are not just two interesting Bible stories, for both illustrate the plight of all mankind who someday shall stand guilty before a holy God. To picture that day as a courtroom scene robs it of reality. In a courtroom, men stand before their peers. On that day, they will stand before the Almighty One. Those who are lost will know their destiny as they stand there. There will be no legitimate excuses. God knows they are guilty, and they know their guilt. Think about the question which could be asked, “What can we say?”

We must not forget that we shall be there. The petty excuses we offer to ourselves today will be meaningless. Faithful Christians will stand in awe with hopeful expectation. Sinful men and lukewarm Christians will cower in fear before the Almighty.  If you are lost now, you will be lost on that day. You are guilty. “What shall we say to our Lord?”

Posted in Dan Jenkins | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Guilty! What do you say?

John 3:16 and God

John 3:16 Means What it Says

From the time we were small children most of us have known this beautiful verse. Unfortunately many in the world have twisted and corrupted this beautiful text failing to accurately portray God’s love for mankind and leaving countless souls hopelessly lost to what God expects of all those He loves. So just what does this verse say?

God

God So Loved The World…

First of all it says that “God,” the one and only true deity, who created all things and who has in His power the salvation and condemnation of His creation, “ so loved the ‘kosmos,’” every man. This word in its context means “ the inhabitants of the earth, men, the human race .” Since humanity, in its totality, has sinned and separated himself from God and life (Isaiah 59:1 – 2; Romans 3:10, 23; 512), God in His infinite love, chose to do something in order to redeem mankind and offer him a second chance.

What was that? “…he gave his only begotten Son.” The second person of the Godhead agree to take on the role of Son and Savior; and was “made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honor; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man” (Hebrews 2:9). The Father sent His son, the only begotten Son of God, to die for our sins. He was the only sacrifice worthy to pay the price and sanctify us. Now if the verse stopped right there then we would not have to do anything and the non – religious, who want to live any way they choose and claim God’s Son as a universal, unconditional sacrifice, could continue on in the way they are going.

However, Jesus continued and said, “that whosoever believeth in him should not perish.” There are three important things for us to notice here: 1) There is a burden placed upon every man ( whosoever ) who has ever lived since the death of Jesus. The word “believeth” here means to “place your faith and trust in.” It is more than just a mental affirmation that Jesus is the Son of God and that He died for the sins of all men. It means that we have to listen, heed, obey, and be faithful to His teachings. 2) The English phrase “should not” is rendered from the single Greek word which means that this is the ONLY way (John 14:6) to keep from perishing eternally. 3) The word “perish” indicates a foundational biblical principle; as long as we are joined to God in a spiritual relationship we have spiritual life. But since sin separates us from God, that sin brings forth spiritual death, if we die physically, separated from God, we have eternal death (separation). The only hope we have is Christ.

So the natural, logical, and honest question would be the same as it was on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:28), for Saul of Tarsus (Acts 9:6), or of the Philippian Jailor (Acts 16:30), “What must we do in order to be saved?” Obviously God’s love shown to us in the sacrifice of His Son demands a reciprocal love from us. Jesus said, “If you love me, keep my commandments” (John 14:15). He asks us even today, “And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?” (Luke 6:46).

Repent of your sins (Acts 17:30); confess Jesus with your words and with your life (Luke 9:26); and do what those men on Pentecost, Saul of Tarsus, and the Philippian Jailor all did. “Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls” (Acts 2:41). “And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord” (Acts 22:16). “And he took them the same hour of the night, and washed their stripes; and was baptized, he and all his, straightway” (Acts 16:33).

But then remember, this is only the beginning, not the end! One must “…observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you” (Matthew 28:20), and “be thou faithful unto death” (Revelation 2:10).

Posted in Tim Dooley | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on John 3:16 and God

Sex Education & Children

Want to know why porn is so popular among 12-year-olds?

[Warning: The following article contains graphic words—but nothing our children are not getting in their sex ed. classes.]

Sex Education

Sex Education Should Not Be Taught by Public Schools.

I would normally apologize for using graphic language in an article—but friends, if they can teach it to our elementary school children, then it’s time we talk frankly about it! The Bible is crystal clear that purity is not just a suggestion, but a command from our Creator. We are told to flee sexual immorality (1 Corinthians 6:18). In Paul’s letter to the church at Thessalonica he admonished, “abstain from sexual immorality” (1 Thessalonians 4:3-5). He observed impurity as a work of the flesh that would keep one out of heaven (Galatians 5:19-21). I could list another 15-20 Scriptures that remind readers to remain pure and set our minds on things above.

Intellectually we understand this principle. We may even “Amen” it from our pulpits. I believe that on a basic level we understand why God puts such an emphasis on purity. But somewhere between the brain and our mouth/actions there is a major disconnect. We know what the Bible says, but we continue to justify our kindergarteners participating in sexual education.

Friends, they are five to six years old. Let me say that again—five and six. They are still learning to read and spell. Yet, because we are so married to the public school system and feel like we can’t do anything about it, we justify this atrocity, claiming “some children won’t get it at home.” Allow me to bluntly ask you: Have you actually looked at what they are “getting”?

In the Clark County school district (Las Vegas) they are considering requiring sex education for kindergarteners. According to Katherine Timpf, “Under the new curriculum, children ages 5 through 8 would be taught that “touching one’s genitals to feel good is called masturbation” (see http://www.nationalreview.com/article/389095/school-district-considering-sex-education-kindergartners-katherine-timpf). Again, they are teaching this to kindergarteners!

But Las Vegas is not the first. Literally all across the country there is a push to expose children to sexual images, sexual content, and homosexual tolerance starting at a very young age. In 2013 children in Chicago joined this illustrious club. One news report noted, “Kindergarteners in Chicago public schools will soon be given sex education. The Chicago Board of Education approved the program, which includes discussions on sexual orientation and gender identity.” (http://www.10news.com/news/watercooler/chicago-school-board-approves-sex-education-program-for-kindergarten-030113)

This follows a 2010 report from Montana where they proposed teaching 5th graders the different ways people have intercourse and first graders about “gay love” (http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/07/14/montana-sex-education-proposal-draws-outrage-graders-learn-gay-sex/). Gay love? In the first grade?!

Allow me to stop right here and “read your mind.” Most individuals reading this with children in the school system right now are probably thinking, “That won’t happen at our school.” You are right—because if FoSE (Future of Sex Ed) has their way with your school system, it will probably be much worse. Elizabeth Harrington wrote on the new national standards in 2012: “Ideally, comprehensive sexuality education should start in kindergarten and continue through 12th grade,” says the “National Sexuality Education Standards” report, drawn up by a range of advocates, academics and public education officials. The Future of Sex Education (FoSE), an initiative started by sex education advocates, developed the standards “to create a strategic plan for sexuality education policy and implementation.” (http://cnsnews.com/news/article/begin-sex-ed-kindergarten-says-new-national-standards-report; see also http://www.futureofsexed.org). Just a quick glance of the scrolling “news” headlines on their websites gives you a pretty good understanding of what they are teaching:

And these are the people who want to set the standards! While we in the church are busy arguing about whether this is acceptable, they are having strategic planning sessions on the future and implementation of sexual education. They are three steps ahead of parents, many of whom have yet to even acknowledge this battle for the heart, purity, and soul of our children. For you see, the homosexual agenda met all the way back in the early 1990s and made sexual education one of their agenda items. Ask yourself this question: Who are these individuals coming in teaching children about gay love and anal intercourse?

What has happened to abstinence and purity? Oh that’s right they were considered religious by the courts, and therefore aren’t supposed to be taught in the government schools. In Kendrick vs. Bowen 1987, the court ruled: “The harm of premarital sexual relations…[is] elements of religious doctrine. It is a fundamental tenet of many religions that premarital sex…[is] wrong. In short, [teaching premarital sexual abstinence] has the primary effect of advancing religion…. [T]he inescapable conclusion is that federal funds have been used… to teach matters inherently tied to religion.” [KENDRICK v. BOWEN; 657 F. Supp. 1547, 1562, (D.D.C. 1987)].

Just how far have we sunk? I refuse to show you some of the graphic images they show our children. But consider these examples of where our school systems are in terms of sex and purity:

  1. Provincetown, Mass decided to make condoms available to first graders in 2010 (http://www.wcvb.com/Condoms-For-Elementary-Students-Yes-Says-Mass-Town/11288760)
  2. In Red Hook, NY middle school girls were instructed to “role-play lesbian relationship” and ask female classmates for a kiss as a part of an anti-bullying exercise (http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/04/middle_school_girls_told_to_ask_for_a_lesbian_kiss_in_anti-bullying_workshop.html)
  3. In Fayetteville, AR thirteen year old Chloe Rubiano was ordered to remove her shirt because it said “Virginity Rocks.” Chloe and her mom believed the shirt sent a positive message, however school officials told her that she had to put on something else. (http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/school-orders-girl-to-remove-virginity-rocks-shirt.html)
  4. In Shawnee, Kansas one set of parents found out that the “abstinence-based curriculum” that they’d been told the school was using was far from it. Todd Starnes reported:

A Kansas father said he was shocked after he discovered his 13-year-old daughter’s health curriculum included references to vaginal intercourse, anal sex, and touching each other’s genitals. “I got furious,” Mark Ellis, of Shawnee, Kan., told me. “And I’m still worked up about it.” Ellis’ daughter is an eighth grade student at Hocker Grove Middle School in the Shawnee Mission School District. Last week, she came home from school and showed her parents a photograph she had taken of a poster on a classroom door. “How do people express their sexual feelings?” the poster read. Underneath the question was a list of possible answers. Some were G-rated, like hugging, holding hands and talking. But there were also some NC-17 answers like “vaginal intercourse, anal sex, touching each other’s genitals, oral sex, sexual fantasy and caressing.” (see http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/?s=sex+ed)

In an article titled “Obama: Sex Ed for Kindergartners ‘Is the Right Thing to Do’” Terence Jeffrey observed, “At a Planned Parenthood convention at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Washington, D.C., on July 17, 2007, a teenage girl who said she worked as a sex-education ‘peer educator’ in the D.C. public schools asked then-U.S. Sen. Obama what he would do to encourage the teaching of ‘medically accurate, age-appropriate, and responsible sex education’ (see http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-sex-ed-kindergartners-right-thing-do).

Christian parents, its time you reclaim your children and teach children that sexual relations were created by God—and are only good in the context of marriage. It’s time we as a church learn how to do the job correctly, so our government will stop perverting the hearts and minds of our young. It’s time we admit there is a major problem out there and begin discussions on what to do about the problem.

What’s even more unsettling is that the information in this article is really just the tip of the iceberg. I strongly encourage you to check out our latest book, “Failure: What Christian Parents Need to Know About American Education” by Jack Wilkie, which devotes a whole chapter to exposing the dangers of modern sex education and takes an in-depth look at all of the challenges to the Christian faith in American schools. Click the “Failure” tab above for more info or click the link to order your copy.

Posted in Brad Harrub | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Sex Education & Children

Doctrine of Fellowship

Let Us Apply These Truths to the Doctrine of Fellowship!

(Brother Guy N. Woods was, perhaps, one of the most capable scholars our era has seen.  Sometime in the 1980s, brother Woods preached a sermon titled, “The Security of the Believer.”  His purpose in this sermon was to show that the Christian who is doing his best to live faithfully to the Lord, can depend upon the mercy and grace of God to forgive his sins of ignorance, weaknesses, and stupidity.  A large portion of this sermon is dedicated to expounding 1 John 1:7.  We note that this passage not only has reference to forgiveness through the blood, but fellowship of Christians one to another.  Below are some excerpts from this sermon.  I urge each and every Christian to consider carefully and prayerfully these truths as one studies the biblical doctrine of fellowship.  These are excerpts.  We have made a diligent effort to keep them in context, but space limits us from reproducing the entire sermon here.  We start with the words of brother Woods approximately six minutes into his sermon the audio recording of which is available on the Internet– Kevin Cauley.)

Fellowship

Our Fellowship Needs to Be in the Light.

“. . . we read in first John two and one: “My little children, these things write I unto you that you sin not.”  Observe that this is an admonition against sin – instruction to us to avoid it to the extent of our ability.  But the verse continues, “If any man sin, he has an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous.”  There our Lord is said to be our advocate and an advocate is a pleader, signifying about the same as our English words lawyer or attorney, the function of which is to plead one’s case.  This represents our Lord as our heavenly lawyer, there arguing our case not, of course, upon our merit, but upon his.  And further, had John here intended to look at the matter as an overall act and as sin continuously, then the verb of the passage would not have been in the aorist tense, but it is in the first John two passage.  And what it says in effect is this.  “I write to admonish you against a life of sin, but in the event (and I would insert parenthetically that this is not to be intent[ional] or by premeditation, but growing out of ignorance or weakness or stupidity) if one sins he has an advocate.”  And sins there suggest a single act.  And so what is said here is, that in the event of such for the faithful Christian, then there is the advocate provided.

Take a look with me please at what I regard as the single most wonderful thing for the Christian taught in the Bible.  In first John chapter one verse seven, “If we walk in the light as he is in the light we have fellowship one with another and the blood of Jesus Christ his son cleanseth us from all sin.” . . .  Look at a simple analysis.  “If,”(there is the condition) “we walk” (there is the manner of conduct) “in the light” (that’s the sphere of conduct) “as he is in the light” (that’s the standard of conduct) “we have fellowship one with another” (that’s the result of blessing) “and the blood of Jesus Christ,” (that’s the agent) “cleanses us” (the action contemplated) “from all sin” (the subject under consideration).  Let’s examine it a bit closer.  “If we walk….”  Walking in the Bible is a very common figure for Christianity and a very fitting one because walking suggests an unwearied approach to a goal.  And that is exactly what Christianity is; it is a walk from earth to heaven and the goal is eternal life, but that walk is circumscribed, it’s not anywhere, everywhere; it is in the light.  Light is a synonym for truth as its opposite darkness symbolizes error.  Hence to walk in the light is to live by the truth, of course, the truth of God’s word.  For those who so do, the blood cleanses.

Number one, that teaches us that the faithful child of God is not condemned.  Did you observe that I said, “Faithful child of God?”  You are not to understand these remarks to apply to apostates.  You are not to understand me to be talking about one who deliberately pursues a course of sin.  I am not.  I am talking about people just like us who want to go to heaven, who are trying to go to heaven, but who because of our weaknesses and frailties, imperfections, our ignorance and often times our stupidity, we make mistakes.  What is our first proposition?  The faithful child of God is not condemned.

Listen.  Romans the eight chapter verse one, “There is therefore now no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.”  What?  There is therefore now no condemnation to everybody everywhere?  Oh no.  Look at the limiting and restrictive phrases.  “There is therefore now no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus.”  To everybody who that’s in Christ?  Not necessarily so, because sometimes people in the body of Christ, the church, deliberately pursue a course of sin and fall.  Well, what then?  “There is therefore now no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus who walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit.”  To walk after the Spirit is to walk with the Spirit’s leading. Romans 8:14 “as many as are lead by the Spirit are the sons of God,” but we are lead to live as sons of God by the teaching of the Spirit upon the sacred page.  It follows then that to be lead by the Spirit is to be lead by the Spirit’s teaching.  So what John says here is that those who walk not after the flesh, which means a carnal fleshly ungodly existence, but who [are] guided and directed with the Spirit, these are those who have the assurance of the passage.  What’s the similarity between Paul’s condition and John’s?  What was Paul’s condition?  “Who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.”  What was John’s condition?  “Who walk in the light as Christ is in the light.”  What do those statements mean? Exactly the same.  One is a commentary on the other.  And both of them mean to live as best you can by his word.  What results for those who thus do?  The blood cleanses.  If we walk in the light the blood cleanses.  If we keep on walking in the light, the blood keeps on cleansing.

Secondly, the reason the faithful child of God is not condemned, God does not impute to him sin.  The word “impute” often appears in the Bible, both Old and New Testaments.  And it means to charge to account, to put to one’s credit, to chalk up against.  That’s why we say that there is a relationship in which a faithful Christian can be with God in which there is not an imputation of sin, we’re simply saying, that to such God does not charge it to their account.  Here’s a passage surely every preacher in the audience can quote it and give the reference.  But all of you should again ponder it if you haven’t yet memorized it to do so before you retire this evening.  It is found in Romans chapter four and verse eight.  Romans four and verse eight, and it reads, “Blessed is the man to whom the Lord doth not impute sin.”  Isn’t that a magnificent utterance?  Under consideration here is a person said to be in a happy fortunate state.  Why is it that he is so greatly blessed?  God does not impute sin to him.  What does the word impute mean?  To charge to account.  Here it is the person whose account God does not place sin.  Why?  Because he is in a relationship to God where he cancels it out.  What is that relationship?  As we walk in the light the blood cleanses.  If we keep on walking in the light, the blood keeps on cleansing.

A failure to recognize this principle leads people into error touching the relationship of prayer and confession to forgiveness.  I don’t remember having heard it in recent days, but I think it hasn’t been but a few months since I heard a preacher suggest the idea that a person must specifically catalog every sin of which he is guilty and make specific mention thereof to God in order to be saved.  Why, I’m certain that’s not so.  I’m sure that if that were so, none of us would ever get to heaven.  For granting that we can and must –and you watch this distinction because it’s a vital one – granting that we can and must catalog those sins with which we are acquainted and our confession must be as public as the sin, a sin known only to God should be confessed only to God and certainly not to a so-called prayer partner.  Sin known only to one or a few confessed to the one or the few as the case may be.  A public sin confessed before the church.  Of course the book so teaches.  But what about that vast area of sin – that vast area of sin of which we are all guilty which we don’t even know we did, how can you confess a sin you don’t know you committed?  Why for one to know every sin of which he’s guilty, he’d have to know the Bible perfectly.  He’d have to know as much as God knows … because if there’s any area of information that he didn’t possess, there might be duties and responsibilities in that area that he’s violating.  It is in that area especially that the marvelous truth of this lesson applies.

A failure to recognize this principle leads people to a restricted concept regarding the extent of God’s grace.  I recall being in a meeting a few years ago in an Arkansas town, sat in a Bible class on the Lord’s day of the meeting, a brother, not a preacher, but a man of some ability, teaching the lesson to a group of past middle aged people all of whom so far as I know were Christians and he was taking the position that in spite of and despite the fact that they did the best they could, they still might not be able to make it to heaven.  And amazingly a number in the class agreed.  I regard that as a reflection on the grace of God as an insinuation that He offers us salvation but he puts it up there just a little bit beyond our ability to reach.

Ponder the picture that is so vividly drawn for us in the earlier chapters of the Revelation, [in] four, five, six, seven, are the Ancient of Days, the God of heaven, who sits in inexpressible splendor on the throne of his glory and before Him are the four living creatures, beyond them, the twenty and four elders, beyond them, a hundred and forty and four thousand, and beyond them in vast mighty semi-circle, a multitude which no man can number.  How many?  A multitude which no man can number.  Well, who are they?  Are they people who lived perfect lives?  No, quite the contrary.  Listen to what the text says.  “These are those who have come out of great tribulation and have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the lamb.”  How we should rejoice friends that there is a fountain filled with blood drawn from Immanuel’s veins where sinners plunged beneath that flood lose all their guilty stains.  That sentiment often expressed in sermon and song finds origin not only in this great passage, but in a remarkable one found in the prophesy of Zechariah chapters twelve, thirteen and fourteen of a fountain open in Jerusalem with a stream flowing to the former and the hinder sea.  Imagine if you will a bubbling fountain.  See a stream flowing backward from it, one forward.  The fountain represents the pouring out of our Lord’s blood at Calvary.  The stream backward, the provision made for the saints who died in the triumphs of faith in earlier dispensations.  The stream forward, the provision made for us in this the Christian age.  Sometimes people postpone obedience to the gospel on the ground they are afraid they can’t live good enough.  Why friends, if we could live good enough, we wouldn’t need any plan at all.  It is simply because we can’t live good enough we have to have a plan.”

Posted in Kevin Cauley | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Doctrine of Fellowship