Making a Great Leader

Making a Great Leader

A good leader has outstanding characteristics.

A good leader has outstanding characteristics.

When we consider elders in the church and other leaders, we can read from the Scriptures what qualities to look for in a leader. For instance, in 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1 we find the qualities that make an elder (bishop, pastor, presbyter). But now what? What do I mean by this? Well, when one humbles himself before God and obeys the Gospel and becomes a Christian, Paul and Peter describe them as coming out of the water as a baby (Romans 6:3-4; 1 Peter 2:2). But, if that is true of Christians, is that not also true of leaders in the church? An leader worth his or her salt knows that qualities are just a starting point for leadership.

Leadership is hard and often ugly. It has its growing pains, and church leadership is no exception. In the church, elders who are appointed to office oftentimes leave because they did not realize all the difficulties that are involved or they presumed that once they are in that role that it is smooth sailing from there. But hardly. There are countless elders who have thrown in the towel. Why? Could it be that they gave it all they could? Or, could it be that they were not continually equipped for the ministry of elders or the ministry of deacons? I believe that church leaders should be looking for ways they can develop as a leader and as a follower of Christ. That means that it will take more than just reading the Bible because staying stagnant is easy. But, great church leaders don’t choose what is easy; they choose what is best for the church. So, consider if you will, a small list of characteristics above and beyond the qualities found in the Bible.

It begins by knowing that the very best church leaders are life long learners. Leaders should always possess an insatiable curiosity. This is because they do not know everything and are constantly and consistently seeking ways to improve themselves and the qualities that got them into the role of an elder. These leaders are looking at what other church leaders are doing and seeing if there are better ways of handling things or solving problems or if the church is equipped to the best of their knowledge. But, those who believe they do not need help from others or that they need no additional knowledge need to reexamine themselves and why they are leaders.

Great leaders are wonderful listeners. They can hear a pin drop and what I mean is that there is nothing that will empower and encourage others you serve with than to know that you listen to them. Great leaders are not just a body in the room. They are more than just being present. They are involved.

Along similar lines of listening is being a leader who has a mentor. No great leader came to know what he knows without someone helping him or her along the way. And, in the church, it is essential, in my humble opinion, to have a mentor. Preachers are constantly seeking advice from those who are older. Why not elders? Do they think there is no need? Do they think they are better than others? Do they think that just because each congregation is autonomous that no one could share ideas? If so, then how did each letter of the New Testament float around to each congregation? Maybe the Roman Christians should have kept their letter to themselves? You see, the best leaders understand that there is much to learn from leaders who have gone before them. If you don’t have a mentor, ask yourself, “Who is someone that is where I want to be in 10-20 years?” and ask them to coffee (I go to Starbucks). Pick their brain and ask them how they got where they are. Ask your mentor to meet with you on a regular basis. That might mean on a monthly basis or a few times a year.

But, even more beyond these qualities is that the best leaders live on the solution-side of life. Why do we always look at things as a problem to overcome? Must leaders always see themselves as a victim? Must we shift the blame, pass the bucket or can we just find the solution?? Having a solution mentality is realizing that you are a peacemaker and that life is full of hardships and challenges, but that it’s our responsibility to ask the question, “How can I make this better?” And, when there is an issue, nothing is better when one sees a wise and humble eldership seek for a solution. This is vital to an eldership.

Another great characteristic of a leader in the church is to not be a “know it all.” You can and you may be, but you are wrong. That may sting! But, who is perfect that is reading this? Not me and certainly not you. Only Christ is perfect and only He is sinless. So, remember that great leaders don’t have all the answers, and they know that. They are humble and willing to admit when they are wrong or when they need help. And in fact, a great eldership consists of great elders who make each other’s weaknesses strong.

I hope you can see that there is so much more than just qualities of an elder or a deacon or preacher or any other leader in and out of the church. Everyone has their ups and downs, their challenges and roadblocks, but great leaders approach each one and the things they face with truth and grace. Great leaders know when to say yes and when to say no. Great leaders know when they are about to burnout and how to slow down so they can continue to fight the good fight of faith. And, they have people in their life who tell them when they are out of balance and help them focus on what is important. May we all learn from these few characteristics.

Posted in Robert Notgrass | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Making a Great Leader

Relationship with God

Relationship with God

God is mighty and desires a relationship with you.

God is mighty and desires a relationship with you.

When you come to the end of the of the Chronicles of the kings of Israel and Judah you also come to the end of the Hebrew Bible. And while there is still much to learn from the poets and prophets of the Old Testament 2 Chronicles 36 ends the inspired historical account of the people of Israel. But this also serves as a reminder that story of the people of Israel is first and foremost a story about God and His relationship with His creation. What should be evident is:

The Lord God is the one true and living God of all creation. “And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:” (Mark 12:29). “There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called in one hope of your calling; one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all” (Ephesians 4:4–6).

He is a God of covenant and desires to have a relationship with His creation. “For it pleased the Father that in Him all the fullness should dwell, and by Him to reconcile all things to Himself, by Him, whether things on earth or things in heaven, having made peace through the blood of His cross” (Colossians 1:19–20).

He is a God of both justice and mercy. “Righteousness and justice are the foundation of Your throne; Mercy and truth go before Your face” (Psalm 89:14).

There are inescapable consequences to failing to keep His will. “For when they say, ‘Peace and safety!’ then sudden destruction comes upon them, as labor pains upon a pregnant woman. And they shall not escape” (1 Thessalonians 5:3). Each king was said to either have done that which was right in the sight of the Lord or that which was evil. Each had free will to choose what path he would take. We too have the same choice today, and every day, which we are blessed to live on God’s green earth.

How do you view God today? How is your relationship with Him at this very moment? If God were to have your life recorded for posterity how would your life be viewed? The choice today is yours…be wise, do what is right in the sight of the Lord, and be faithful! Will your life end in eternal glory with the Lord or will it be seen only as a sad saga of what could have been?

Posted in Tim Dooley | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Relationship with God

Children’s Church

Children’s Church and the Word of God

I know that this is a broad title. We will narrow our focus to particular concerns with “children’s church”. But before we do we must note that one finds no direct reference to “children’s church” in God’s word the Bible (II Timothy 3:16). Just like there is no direct reference to “Sunday School” or “Bible School” and yet they are conducted as an expediency to carry out what God has directed that He wants done. God wants those in Christ to be taught and to teach (Matthew 28:20 Acts 2:42     Acts 20:7-9   Hebrews 5:11, 12). It is in the manner in which “children’s church” is carried out that we will look at in scripture. So when we reference “children’s church” we are talking about the practice of removing children from a worship assembly of the body of Christ to teach them outside of that worship assembly.

Children's Church sounds great!  Where is it authorized?

Children’s Church sounds great! Where is it authorized?

Here in lies the issue or problem that we will address. In this practice you have a saint leave off either all or part of God commanded worship with the body of Christ to teach children about worship.   When one “leaves off or behind” all or part of worship they have “forsaken” the directive to “provoke one another to love and good works” in that assembly for worship. The inspired of God Hebrew writer says that one should not “forsake” (leave off or behind) the assembling of the body of Christ where one is carrying out God’s command to “consider one another to provoke unto love and good works”. When a child of God leaves the worship assembly to conduct “children’s church” they can not carry out God’s directive concerning worship. Some may say we are only leaving off part of worship and also we are doing a good work. The question still remains where in God’s word do we have the authority (the authorization) to do so? What part does God authorize to be left off? Some would suggest we could leave after the Lord’s supper and leave off the learning from the preaching. But again where is there authorization from God to do so?   In both Acts 2:42 and Acts 20:7-9 God demonstrated that He wants the word of Christ, the apostles teaching to be heard by teaching in the assembling of the body of Christ. By forsaking the assembly at any point by our own willful actions and not by God’s command we find ourselves sinning willfully. Notice in Hebrews 10 that verses 26-31 reminds us of the great consequences of “willfully” sinning. When one chooses to “forsake” (leave off or behind) the assembly by not assembling for all or part they have not followed God’s command (law or directive) and therefore have willfully sinned (I John 3:4). Also since there is no authorization from God to forsake any part of the worship assembly and only man’s notion (Matthew 15:7-9) to do so, then any part could be left off. That is the logical conclusion from willfully forsaking part of the worship assembly. No one would suggest that they can willfully forsake the assembly when it came to the Lord’s supper or singing and still be pleasing to God would they?

As for the second part, that the willful leaving of the worship assembly to do a good thing means it is ok for it to be practiced. Does scripture (God’s word) teach us we can willfully disregard what God said to do to do something we see as a good thing to do? I direct your attention to I Samuel chapter 15. Here King Saul is told to hearken unto the “voice of the words of Jehovah” in I Samuel 15:1. Then he (Saul) is given directives by God through Samuel to utterly destroy the Amelekites (vs.3). Then in verse 9 we learn that King Saul did not follow all the words of God in what God told Him to do. In verse 9 notice it says “But Saul and the people…” did only part of what God commanded them to do. They chose to do something that they thought would be good toward God. Look in verse 13 where Saul declares that doing only part of what God commanded him to do in order to do what he thought was a good thing toward God meant that he did what God commanded him. He was soon to discover from Samuel (vs.16) that God said it was not. God said it was “evil” in His sight (vs.19). In verse 22 we learn that God says it is better to obey His voice than to go against it in an effort to do what one may think to be good.

In verse 23 God calls what Saul did rebellion like the sin of witchcraft. God has commanded us to worship Him in spirit and in truth (John 4:24) and that means in accordance with His word (John 17:17). Teaching children the truth about worship or anything else should not have a child of God willfully disregard God’s command to assemble to worship, whether by forsaking all or any part of the assembly to worship Him.

It may seem that we have not addressed the aspect of separating children from the worship assembly but in light of what we have looked at in scripture we have. For how can it be done without having a redeemed child of God forsake the assembling for worship to teach them? It can’t! Therefore we have addressed the separating of children from worship. “If” it is thought that children need to learn about worship apart from what they learn from their parents and other saints in the worship assembly it can be done at another time period. Because in doing so we do not violate any one of God’s commands given to the body of Christ.

Pat Powers

Posted in Guest Authors | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Children’s Church

EL PAPEL DE LA MUJER

EL PAPEL DE LA MUJER EN LA IGLESIA DEL SEÑOR

PARTIENDO DEL PRINCIPIO

Como todo buen inicio siempre debemos comenzar por lo correcto y lógico; por el principio, de esta manera obtendremos una vista más amplia y por supuesto llegar a conclusiones correctas que es el propósito de  cada persona religiosa, tratar de agradar a al Dios de la Biblia, lamentablemente estamos de acuerdo que no todos están adorando, ni caminando en conformidad a ese Dios. Los Testigos de Jehová por un lado negando la divinidad del Señor Jesús, distorsionando las sagradas Escrituras entre otras cosas, El catolicismo perseverando en la adoración de ídolos, usando tradiciones paganas como regla de fe desechando la Biblia como única autoridad, y por supuesto no podían faltar los Evangélicos o pentecostales en todas sus ramas existentes usando instrumentos en la adoración (Cosa que no existe autoridad Bíblica para ello) y dando participación a las mujeres en esta misma. Este último concepto es el que estaremos tratando en detalle,  la razón por la que mencionamos estas denominaciones es porque, como podrá notar hay una enmarcada diferencia entre ellas; por la que no adoran juntos pero, el papel de la mujer en la Iglesia es un punto de unidad para muchos de ellos. Unos más abiertos que otros claro, pero con la misma corriente de pensamiento trataremos con más detalle algunos de estas ideas a la luz de la Biblia un poco más adelante. Ahora bien para buscar el principio debemos, por supuesto mirar de nuevo al Génesis y así examinar todas las causas y los propósitos originales.

Qual es el papel de la mujer en la Iglesia?

Qual es el papel de la mujer en la Iglesia?

Y dijo Jehová Dios: No es bueno que el hombre esté solo; le haré ayuda idónea para él”(Génesis 2:18), después de haber creado al hombre Dios miró a su creación y estaba incompleta el primer principio que hay que mirar a que es que Dios no creo a la mujer primero, es más ni siquiera al mismo tiempo, sino que fue después en el mismo capítulo en Gen 2:22 nos explica que después que el hombre puso nombre a los animales Dios lo hizo entrar en un sueño profundo, y una de sus costillas hizo a la mujer “Varona porque del varón fue tomada” Génesis 2:23- Esta frase implica mucho, sin temor a equivocarnos podemos pensar que la mujer no estuvo en la mente Dios para la creación los textos nos muestran que vino después siendo formada de una manera diferente a la del hombre. Para nada es nuestro propósito discriminar a las mujeres, solamente estamos analizando que fue lo que sucedió en el principio que va a ser lo que el apóstol  Pablo va explicar después haciendo referencia al mismo punto de partida…el principio. Fue a Adán quien Dios designó la tarea de poner los nombres a los animales vemos aquí, el grado de responsabilidad o de liderazgo si se quiere, que se le es encargado al hombre, claro se podría argumentar que Eva aún no había sido creada y que por eso no se les hizo ni siquiera el encargo juntos, pero ¿Porque Dios no se aguardo a crear a Eva primero y luego encargar a ambos el asunto de los nombres de los animales ya como pareja?, Dios en su infinita sabiduría a puso al hombre en una posición de liderazgo en el principio fue así y en la actualidad el Señor no ha cambiado de parecer.

¿DENTRO O FUERA DE LA REUNIÓN DE LA IGLESIA?

Por supuesto que siempre ha de existir esta pregunta cuando estamos hablando de la participación de las hermanas en lo que asuntos de fe se refiere. Es importante mencionar que Dios ha tenido en mente a la Iglesia desde antes de la fundación del mundo (Ef.1:3-4), ha sido su diseño y su deseo, ha colocado los elementos y reglas que Él mismo ha determinado. Sin embargo los hombres nos hemos encargado de destruir ese diseño perfecto. Las hermanas han tenido que atravesar por el mismo proceso que los varones, para lograr obtener la salvación, en este sentido el apóstol Pablo expreso: “…no hay varón ni mujer; porque todos sois uno en Cristo Jesús” (Gálatas 3:28). Muchos han tomado el versículo 28 para replicar que no debemos de hacer discriminación a las mujeres en la Iglesia y que por eso pueden participar, otros más conservadores han tomado la posición que si puede hacerlo siempre y cuando toda la congregación no esté presente es decir fuera de los servicios de adoración, pero ¿Apoya esto la Biblia?

  1. La Iglesia continúa siendo la Iglesia dentro y fuera de un determinado horario de reunión aún en el caso de Hechos 18:24-26, en la exhortación a Apólos, el rol prominente es llevado a cabo por el varón; Aquila. Aunque en nuestra versión Reina Valera leamos a Prisila de Primero no indica que ella haya tomado la batuta en la exhortación. El análisis en el texto griego nos indica que la terminología utilizada es plural, por tanto ambos están exponiendo más exactamente el camino del Señor aún fuera de algún servicio de adoración.
  2. La clara enseñanza de 1Ti 2:8, es que “los hombres levanten manos santas en todo lugar”. La palabra griega para hombres es “Aner” Significa específicamente varones en género masculino. Por supuesto la acción de levantar manos sin ira no contienda no es literal sino que hace referencia a la acción de adoración, esto es en TODO LUGAR- “pas topos” una vez más indica cualquier lugar fuera de la adoración congregacional.
  3. Mucho más allá de eso 1Tim 2:11, continúa indicando el roll de la mujer en la Iglesia el cual es guardar silencio. Obviamente este silencio no es un absoluto silencio la idea que se nos presenta en el griego es de una sujeción, guardar una distancia, estar quieto “hesuchia” por lo tanto dentro y fuera de la congregación como tal el papel que Dios desea para las hermanas es precisamente el que leemos en estos versículos.

A pesar de estas aclaraciones a la luz de las Sagradas Escrituras, sin lugar a dudas existirán muchas más preguntas y cuestiones que surgirán, en cualquiera de los casos el más sabio proceder debería ser conformarnos a la simplicidad de la Biblia. El encargo que Dios ha dado a los varones fieles en su Iglesia, es un encargo divino por ende ninguno de nosotros tiene la potestad de transferir este cargo o privilegio a las damas. La Biblia es y debe de ser el estándar de Fe para todo lo que hagamos y como lo hagamos. También es sumamente importante recalcar que dentro de este punto hay quienes prefieren tener sus reservas aunque otros no tanto. En muchos países centroamericanos los viajes misioneros departe de Norte América están presente anualmente  estos viajes misioneros están relacionados a hermanos que hablan el idioma inglés y por tanto; al trabajar en las campañas evangelísticas necesitan de un traductor. Una hermana aunque sea en tales condiciones NO está autorizada por las escrituras para traducir a un grupo de hermanos porque es como si estuviera predicando. Algunos han tomado el argumento de las hijas de Felipe quienes profetizaban para tomar autoridad de la predicación de mujeres. Es más bien una cuestión de sujeción. La hermana Janie Cram dijo al respecto:

Como miembros de la Iglesia de Cristo del Nuevo Testamento las mujeres no debemos sentirnos menos por no pasar a predicar al frente. Dios en su infinita sabiduría nos ha dado limitaciones que consideradas totalmente razonables, nosotras somos más débiles en muchos aspectos y causamos problemas fácilmente entre nosotras. Sin embargo Dios nos ha dado un bello papel que es el de amar a nuestros esposos e hijos y es algo que lo sabemos hacer y muy bien, por tanto es cuestión de asumir nuestros rolles.

Está Claro entonces cual debería ser el roll de las mujeres en la Iglesia del Señor, no por discriminación o racismo sino más bien porque las Iglesias de Cristo, desean caminar sobre la brecha trazada por Cristo mismo. En el caso de nuestro texto en 1Corintios 14:34 debe de tomarse en cuenta  el contexto, llegaríamos a una conclusión semejante: “el pasaje prohíbe a la mujer, cantar, orar, y en ninguna manera participar vocalmente de la adoración” . Sin embargo el pasaje no llega a tal extremo. Sino que más bien debe ser entendido unido a 1Timoteo 2:8-14 y 1Co 11:1-20 donde la intención de Pablo era que cada uno asumiera su roll. Claro está que el predicar públicamente no era parte del roll de la mujer en la Iglesia del siglo I.

Más bien 1Corintios 14:33-36 nos ayuda a entender que era una doctrina que se estaba practicando en todas las Iglesias de los Santos y no que era un asunto cultural como los pentecostales han querido explicarlo. La Palabra “hablar” del versículo 33, no significa que esté en su completo silencio sino más bien debe ser entendida en cuanto a lo que se está enseñando en el contexto. Esto es hablar para enseñar, o aprendizaje, es decir; se prohíbe el hablar con la intención de enseñar tanto en reuniones públicas, como privadas, porque continúa siendo enseñanza. Ahora la mujer si puede preguntar en las clases bíblicas pero cuando ésta pregunte para co-enseñar,  entonces ahí se habla violado el mandamiento directo enseñado aquí en 1 Corintios 14. La frase “en la Iglesia” limita por completo la participación de la mujer donde haya varones hermanos, así sea en un servicio de adoración (miércoles o domingos), o en una reunión privada, si hay varones presentes aún cuando éstos estén solo tomando fotos el mandamiento de Dios queda quebrantado.

 En los anales de la iglesia primitiva, las mujeres son igualmente notables por su devoción espiritual, fidelidad en la enseñanza de la Palabra de Dios, y apoyo sacrificial de siervos de Dios. Su fe y oraciones se mezclaron con las de los apóstoles en preparación para Pentecostés, y a través de toda la era cristiana la iglesia les debe más de lo que se imagina a las oraciones, lealtad y dones de sus miembros femeninos.

Esta ha llegado a ser una de las características de la Iglesia de Cristo que se ha hido deteriorando en los últimos años y que muchos lo han deteriorado por su falta de conocimiento Bíblico y por su falta de estudio de la palabra de Dios, es triste observar como algunos se aferran a interpretaciones erronas cerrando sus ojos a la verdad de la Biblia. El mundo en que vivimos, trata de convencernos sobre la igualdad de géneros. Tratando de influenciar así a la Iglesia del Señor para ir en pos de un cambio en su naturaleza distintiva. El hermano Winford Claiborn, profesor de Biblia menciona lo siguiente: 

El movimiento de las mujeres, como lo conocemos hoy, no puede ser considerado como una cosmovisión consistente o coherente. Una de sus más fuertes características es su diversidad. No es posible decir, “Las Feministas creen”, a menos que uno identifique a cuáles feministas tiene en mente. Las feministas radicales, tales como Gloria Steinem, Shulamit Firestone y Molly Yard, son enemigas implacables del hogar como Dios lo ordenó y como la mayoría de nosotros hemos conocido todas nuestras vidas.

En realidad lo que el hermano declara no más que una enorme verdad en nuestros días, las reuniones de damas han cobrado más y más fuerza en nuestras congregaciones y las tales representan un peligro grave a la sana doctrina, las razones: El roll de la mujeres está siendo inflamado de tal manera que ahora las hermanas son llamadas: Predicadoras invitadas, Oradoras y más títulos que construyen un show. Muchas de estas reuniones se hacen a carácter nacional donde también hay fondos económicos de por medio. No es que sean malas tales reuniones, sino más bien que hay que mantenerlas en su lugar.

Para concluir debemos de aclarar que no se trata de una señal de inferioridad, así como la sumisión de la esposa a su marido no es señal de inferioridad sino más bien de amor. Dos personas pueden tener las mismas capacidades para dirigir negocios o para aprender pero no se aplica a la parte espiritual o al gobierno de la Iglesia.  Mathew Henry comentó al respecto:

Como la sujeción de la iglesia a Cristo se propone como un ejemplo para las esposas, así el amor de Cristo hacia su iglesia se propone como un modelo para los maridos; y mientras tales ejemplos sean ofrecidos para ambos, y se requiera tanto de cada uno, ninguno tiene razón para quejarse de los mandatos divinos. El amor que Dios requiere del marido en nombre de su esposa compensará la sujeción que Él demanda para ella hacia su esposo; y la sujeción prescrita de la esposa será un abundante regreso por ese amor del esposo que Dios ha hecho ha hecho que sea el deber de ella

En las Escrituras podemos ver cada ejemplo sobre sujeción que nos hacen regresar y pensar que debe ser esa misma corriente de pensamiento, aplicada a la organización de la Iglesia. Este problema actual continúa avanzando como cáncer en las congregaciones de la Iglesia de Cristo, pero la solución inmediata continúa siendo regresar a la Biblia.   Cuando empezó el movimiento feminista, muchos sin embargo esperaban que pasara rápidamente así como las modas pasan este movimiento feministas es mortalmente serios y han llegado para quedarse. ¡Que Dios nos ayude a permanecer en su verdad!

BIBLIOGRAFÍA

Claiborne, Winford. El Movimiento Feminista (La espada Espiritual, Memphis TN: 2009), 12.

Cram, Janie. Encontrando Nuestro Roll En El Plan de Dios (Gospel Avocate, Nashville TN: Gospel Avocate company 2006), 21.

Gingrich, Arndt.  A New Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament (Hendrickson Published MS: 2012), 125.

Harding, Dan. El Silencio Absoluto de la Mujer (Un estudio de 1Corintios 14, Lubbock TX, 1997), 1.

Henry,  Mathew. Comentarios del Nuevo Testamento Vol. VI, p. 715(Sword Bible Software), 2012.

 Lockyer, Herbert. Todas las Mujeres de la Biblia (Editorial Zondervan, Grand Rapids MS: 1988), 20.

Posted in Heiner Montealto | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on EL PAPEL DE LA MUJER

Conquerors Excerpt

Excerpt from the Book More than Conquerors

Conquerors is an excellent and uplifting book focusing Christian lives.

Conquerors is an excellent and uplifting book focusing Christian lives.

Look at the two of them standing there. Few similarities, many differences. One the son of the mighty king; one quite probably the son of a mere shepherd. One armed with the finest sword the royal treasury could provide; the other armed with a home-made sling and whatever stones the local creek bed might possibly yield. One clothed in the finest armor available and emblazoned with the king’s crest; the other covered in only the humble attire of a lowly, smelly shepherd. One whose father commanded thousands of valiant warriors; and one whose father was advanced in years to the point that his youngest son had to oversee his flock of sheep if the family were to survive. What could these two possibly have in common? What had brought these two men, so completely different, so completely together, in this place this day? “…The soul of Jonathan was knit to the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as himself” (1 Samuel 18:1b).

It was an uncommon, uncompromising, indivisible and self-sacrificing respect and love for one another that had brought them together. It was that simple. And what exactly did such love cause them to ultimately do? “Then Jonathan made a covenant with David because he loved him as himself. And Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that was on him and gave it to David, with his armor, including his sword and his bow and his belt” (1 Samuel 18:3-4).

The king’s heir and son, in a deep and abiding love for this lowly peasant shepherd boy, made a covenant, or agreement, with him. It undeniably cost the king’s son much of his own identity as the two boys’ beings were symbolically merged into one and lovingly knit together forever. According to this sacrificial covenant, the lowly shepherd boy David would wear the royal robe and victorious armor of the king’s household. It would be a sign to any and all who would oppose and/or gaze upon him in battle that he had the full and complete backing of the king’s entire household, power, and authority. To confront him, or to strike a blow upon this breastplate, as all knew, was to, in effect, attack all Israel; and to subsequently, supposedly, expect an immediate and deadly response from the very king himself.

David would now fight with the sword, of the son, of the king. To cross swords with him was to invoke the wrath of the king’s son and to ask for an armed conflict with both him and his father. You might as well attack Jonathan. And valiant warrior that he was – sometimes accepting 10-1 odds and more and still emerging victorious (1 Samuel 14:13-14) – that was probably not a very wise idea in those days if one wanted to live very long. To attack David, clothed as he was in the king’s son’s armor would be to invoke the full response of all of Israel as well. It would be as devastating and deadly as if one had personally sought to kill the king’s own son himself. Please consider that, as you prayerfully consider this…

This is the story of another twosome. One, The Invincible Son of The Immortal King; He who obediently and powerfully took His battle straight into the heart of enemy earthly territory (John 1:14-18). The sword which He wielded with perfect precision and unparalleled might, like none other ever had, rose, ripped, and relentlessly fell upon the enemy. Cut, thrust, parry and counterstrike it went, weaving its impenetrable web as seen in so many places in Scripture and particularly in places like Matthew 4:1-10. This “sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God” in the expertly trained hand of the King’s own Son proved absolutely invincible against Satan and his schemes. Outcome: …then the devil left Him…” (Matthew 4:11). The devil could not prevail against that sword. News flash Christian: he still can’t.

Despite weapon after vile weapon, legion after evil legion, as the enemy entirely empties his vast arsenal, never once does this Son of the King in His resilient and impenetrable royal armor ever taste defeat… not once, not ever. Not at the hands of the Pharisees. Not at the hands of the Sadducees. Not even at blood-soaked Golgotha at the hands of the hypocritical Jewish leadership and the evil Roman Empire. Not once, not ever. (Note: The cross was not a loss, but just a victory in the making.) There are instances where the armor may have been nicked or possibly scratched, as after all, the battle was very real and very intense. His shield of faith was put to the ultimate test in the garden just prior to the battle of Golgotha (Matthew 26:36-56). Certainly every single second and every sacrificial step of that awful bloody night was a battle in its own right… And yet… the armor held… the armor healed… and the Christ conquered. For that night was the battle He had come to ultimately win; to overwhelmingly and once and for all conquer (John 12:23-28). And He would not be denied by any measure of self-sacrifice, personal pain, satanic temptation, or even the hordes of hell themselves. Everything prior to this had merely been the warm-ups, the preliminaries, the practices. It was the exhibition season versus the playoffs. Tonight it was all on the line, winner-take-all, with your eternal soul as the ultimate prize and exclusive trophy. The King’s Son in the Royal Armor was headed for the showdown at Golgotha – and He, and it, was far, far more than up to the task of taking the prize – your eternal soul – home with Him.

Wouldn’t you just love to have armor like that to wear in your war? Wouldn’t you like to face Satan’s legions just once with that kind of imperial power and invincible protection? Wouldn’t you love to look Satan square in the face and put that sword to his scrawny little throat and say “Be gone Satan!” and have him have absolutely no choice whatsoever but to leave you alone? You can you know. And you can right now. That’s the thing you must understand from Romans 8. In fact, God intended for it to be exactly that way for you as well. That’s the message of Romans 8 that God so deeply wants for you to understand. You see, you are the David in the previous story. If you are in Christ, you are the one that The King’s Son made a covenant with. You are the one that He loved as Himself, and indeed more than Himself (Philippians 2:3-8). You are the one to whom He gave His royal, invincible, unbeatable armor (Ephesians 6:13-17)! To face you is to face Him. To attack you is to attack Him. And Satan cannot – hear me now Christian – Satan simply cannot get through that armor! He couldn’t then and he can’t now.

So keep your divine armor on Christian! Keep your sword sharp and your shield shined! And be and become, both in the image of God and the armor of God, More Than Conqueror in Christ!

(Please note: The preceding excerpts are taken from a new book, written by this author and published late last fall, entitled “More Than Conquerors.” Please see www.createspace.com/5838095 for further details!)

Posted in Doug Dingley | Tagged , | Comments Off on Conquerors Excerpt