Free Speech

Freedom of Speech

As far as the Christian is concerned, everything that he is, does, and says, belongs to God. So, the Christian’s speech is to serve the Christian’s Lord. This means that the Christian is free to speak, but only in a way that would honor God (Colossians 3:17).

Free Speech?  Seriously?

Free Speech? Seriously?

There are those, however, who suggest that freedom of speech gives us the right to say just about anything that we please, including vulgar language, obscenities regarding other people, backbiting, gossip, and just about any other kind of foul speech imaginable. One of my favorite verses in that regard is Psalm 12:3, 4 “The LORD shall cut off all flattering lips, and the tongue that speaketh proud things: Who have said, With our tongue will we prevail; our lips are our own: who is lord over us?”

While the one type of speech is approved by God, the other type is sinful, and we all recognize that. However, speaking from a legal/constitutional perspective, the courts have determined that both kinds of speech are legally protected. That is, one may stand up and utter vitriolic and vicious words that cut and destroy OR one may stand up and speak the sober truths of righteousness that are contained within the gospel of Christ, right? Well, that’s what we think, at least.

Three news stories have appeared in my email in-box recently regarding seemingly unrelated incidents. One of them had to do with the rantings of one Whoopi Goldberg at a fund raiser for Kerry and Edwards. I won’t get into the sordid details (and I do mean sordid), but Goldberg’s potty mouth spewed just about every form of obscenity in the book and added a couple of new entries. Concerning that event, the Kerry campaign stated that it was “the heart and soul of America.” You can draw your own conclusions. Now, if someone had suggested that Goldberg go to prison over saying such things, no doubt, someone would have yelled, “Free Speech! Free Speech!” and the whole matter would have ended.

On the other hand, there is a man in Wisconsin who has made a couple of banners to be held over freeways on a pedestrian overpass that state, “Homosexuality is sin” and “Christ can set you free.” What has happened to this man? First, the city ordered him off the overpasses. Of course, he cited free speech, but as of late, a federal court judge has sided with the city. If he tries to do this again, guess what? He goes to jail.

In yet another incident, a conservative member of the National Education Association was kicked off of her position in the NEA because she objected to the NEA giving an award to a homosexual activist. Simply for standing up and saying that she didn’t think that this homosexual (who is on the record as saying he wants kindergarteners exposed to homosexuality) deserves an award, she was given “da boot.”

So, here is one incident where a woman can utter the filthiest kind of speech imaginable known to man and be praised for it but on the other hand, two people who stand up for what is right and good and holy, are shut down, no doubt as harboring that politically correct term, “hate.”

How is it that one form of hate speech can be completely ignored (Goldberg’s), but that another form of “hate” speech (which really isn’t) must be legally dealt with and prohibited? There is really only one explanation. Satan has convinced people that wrong is right and that right is wrong. The prophet Isaiah wrote, “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” (Isaiah 5:20).

Do we think that we have a constitutional right to free speech in our churches today? That may be changing before we know it. Today it is the overpass that is being censored, tomorrow, the pulpit. Awake to righteousness! It is time for good Christian people to take back control of our nation.

Posted in Kevin Cauley | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Free Speech

Matthew 2:13-23 – Jesus in Egypt

By Egypt to Galilee and Nazareth

Out of Egypt, God did call his son.

Out of Egypt, God did call his son.

Vs. 13-15 – The wise men depart and now God sends a messenger to warn Joseph regarding Herod’s impending plans. This isn’t the first time that Joseph had been visited by God’s messenger in this way (see Matthew 1:20). The warning is to go to Egypt on account of Herod and his treachery. Why Egypt? First, Egypt was the closest country over which Herod had no control. He could not affect those who were living in that country. Second, Egypt was no longer the place of Pharoanic power. It was a Roman province which was host to millions of transient Jews. Alexandria, in fact, was a seat of Jewish study and learning. The family could feel relatively “at home” there, though in a foreign country. It’s possible that they may have even had distant relatives there. The Jewish people were so widely diverse in this day and age. They were scattered all the way from Babylon to Rome and Egypt to Europe. Third, and most importantly, their journey to Egypt was to fulfill prophecy regarding the Messiah. God knew the evil choice that Herod would make and was so able to inspire His prophets to speak regarding the fact of Jesus’ time in Egypt.

Joseph wasted no time in obeying God’s messenger. While it was still night he took the family and departed. They would remain in Israel until Herod died. This occurred relatively shortly after their descent to Egypt. Josephus records Herod’s death in his Antiquities, Book 17, chapters 6-8. Regarding Herod, he writes, “A man he was of great barbarity towards all men equally, and a slave to his passions; but above the consideration of what was right?.”

The prophecy fulfilled comes from Hosea 11:1, which states, “When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt.” Upon initial inspection, the words appear merely to be a historical statement regarding the nation of Israel’s escape from Egyptian captivity. We must, however, remember that the nation of Israel was typical of the Christ. Israel was the name that God gave Jacob who fathered the twelve tribes. It was given to him after Jacob fought with God’s messenger in Genesis 32:26-30. The context indicates that Israel means “the prince that prevails with God and man.” Jesus is referred to in scripture as a “Prince” (Acts 3:15; 5:31). Jesus prevailed over man in that he overcame the temptations that are common to man. Jesus also prevailed with God in that he was tempted but did not sin (Hebrews 4:15). Moreover, Isaiah also prophecies concerning the Messianic fulfillment of the name Israel (Isaiah 49:3). We conclude that Hosea 11:1 has a double meaning. There is the direct reference made to the nation of Israel, but there is also a typical reference as fulfilled by Jesus as Messiah.

Vs. 16 – It was not the intention of the wise men to deceive Herod. They were righteous men; but they fully recognized God’s authority in such matters and chose to obey God rather than Herod (Acts 5:29). So, from Herod’s perspective, it appeared that the wise men had lied to him and thus deceived him. In truth, they had not, though Herod had deceived them. One may properly conclude from the wise men’s behavior that commitments made under deceptive circumstances are null and void. Herod’s initial deception regarding his desire to worship the child nullified whatever commitment the magi had made to return and tell Herod of the child’s whereabouts. That Herod wanted to kill the child was not the circumstances under which their commitment was made. Hence, they were under no obligation to fulfill their promise.

This, of course, greatly incensed Herod. He couldn’t see the magi’s righteousness for his own wickedness. He thus assumes that they were wicked as well and thus he flew into a rage. Herod thus orders the death of all male children under two years of age in Bethlehem and the area surrounding. A fourth century story regarding this event tells that one of Herod’s own sons was killed due to this order which prompted the historian to quip, “It is better to be Herod’s hog than his son.”

This passage also deflates the modern myth that the wise men were present at Jesus birth, seeing that Herod’s concern was with children two years old and under. That the child was at most that old was indicated to Herod by the wise men in their conversations with him. Verse eleven also indicates this in that Jesus was already in a house by the time of their visit and not still in the stable. It is sad that men so conglomerate and distort scripture to accommodate their traditions. One might think, “but this is such a small matter” to which the words of Jesus are an appropriate reply, “He that is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much: and he that is unrighteous in a very little is unrighteous also in much” (Luke 16:10).

Vs. 17-18 – Ramah was a small town near Bethlehem and thus in the region that would have been affected by Herod’s malice. Rachel figuratively represents the mothers of the women whose children were lost as they were sons of the tribe of Benjamin, the historical Rachel’s son himself.

Yet again Matthew sets forth more prophecy fulfilled regarding the circumstances surrounding Jesus birth. This prophecy, taken from Jeremiah 31:15, in its original context refers to mourning the captivity of Judah. It is yet another example of the type and antitype prophecies that are so common in the scriptures. Babylon’s siege upon Judah resulted in the starvation of many of her citizens to the point where those under siege would murder their own children and consume them for want of meat (Lamentations 4:9-10). Herod’s wicked acts in slaughtering these innocent children were comparable in nature and were a sign that Israel was in need of reformation. His act thus elicited the same outcry and fulfilled the prophet’s words.

This “slaughter of the innocents,” as the event has come to be known, elicited this “lamentation, weeping, and great mourning.” There is no tragedy quite as great as a mother losing her child, particularly when it is the result of malicious wickedness. One can never truly be comforted from such a loss, at least, in this life, and the memory of that event would have opened the wound and evoked the same old feelings and heartache attendant to their loss. Such a sad and tragic event would have left an indelible memory in the minds of the Jewish people. Matthew’s recollection of these historical facts, therefore, served to confirm his story regarding Jesus’ journey to Egypt and gave sufficient reason for his leaving Bethlehem from where the Messiah was to come.

Herod’s act is also reminiscent of Pharaoh’s command to kill the male children in Egypt (Exodus 1:15-22). It was long remembered in the Hebrew national consciousness that out of that situation God raised up another deliverer, Moses. While Matthew doesn’t specifically make mention of that fact, the parallels would have been understood in the Hebrew mind. Here is one, who, like Moses, escaped death as a child and lived to deliver God’s people, but not from physical captivity, but spiritual (Matthew 1:21).

Vs. 19-23 – It wasn’t too long until Herod’s death. Josephus records that there was a lunar eclipse near that time (Antiquities, Book 17, 167). Astronomers have been able to date this lunar eclipse to March 13th, 4 B.C. This was still a few years prior to Herod’s death, but near enough that we know that Joseph, Mary, and Jesus would not have spent a lot of time in Egypt.

God’s messenger delivers the news of Herod’s death to Joseph in yet another dream. The initial command is to return to Israel because the one who sought Jesus’ life is now dead. Hence, he is no longer a threat. Herod appears to be the only one who had sought Jesus life, but the text says, “They are dead which sought the young child’s life.” This may be a further allusion to the life of Moses. In Exodus 4:19 God said to Moses, “Go, return into Egypt: for all the men are dead which sought thy life.” The allusion more closely parallels with the Septuagint than the Hebrew text.

Joseph obeyed and took Jesus and Mary back to Israel. Was he retuning to Bethlehem initially? It’s not stated in the text, but since this was the place of both Mary and Joseph’s heritage (Luke 2:4) it seems likely that he was.

Archelaus was Herod’s successor and it would have been common news who was going to be to replace Herod. Hence it was most likely that Joseph heard this information en route to wherever his initial destination was planned to be. He is properly concerned as Archelaus was Herod’s son. Joseph’s fear was likely that Archelaus would attempt to finish the work that his father failed to complete. God’s messenger confirms this in a dream and Joseph, being warned, returns to Galilee from whence he and Mary had originally come (Luke 2:4) and specifically to the village of Nazareth.

It is here that we find the last prophecy concerning the locative origins of the Messiah fulfilled, namely, that he would be called a Nazarene. Matthew quotes from no specific prophecy. He says “the prophets” because there were multiple ways in which the scriptures could be here applied to Jesus. There are, at least, two senses in which this prophecy is fulfilled. First in the sense that those who undertook the Nazarite vow (Numbers 6:1-21)?to be separated, consecrated, and holy while in fulfillment of the vow?typified the purity that was to be the life of Christ. A second sense comes from an understanding of the Hebrew word for “branch” as found in Isaiah 11:1, which word is “netzer.” It is clear that Isaiah was discussing the Messiah in that passage. One who is a “netzer” is a Nazarene. It is likely this latter sense to which Matthew is referring as several of the prophets refer to the Messiah as “the branch.” See also Jeremiah 23:5 and Zecheriah 3:8; 6:12.

Matthew thus proves by the scriptures in this chapter what needed to be done in order to convince the Jewish reader that Jesus had the credentials in order to be God’s Messiah. He fulfilled the prophecies related to the Messiah’s birth location. He fulfilled the prophecies related to the events surrounding His birth and in that regard is like Moses. And he also fulfilled the prophecies in regard to the places from which he came, Egypt and Nazareth, thus refuting one of the key criticisms that was leveled at Jesus during his lifetime. Those Jewish mental barriers having been removed, Matthew proceeds in chapter three to set forth more modern day associations with prophets, namely, that of John the baptizer.

Posted in Kevin Cauley | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Matthew 2:13-23 – Jesus in Egypt

Matthew 2 – Wise Men

Adoration of the Magi, Wise men. Matthew 2:1-12

The Officials Declare – Jesus Is King

Matthew’s purpose in this chapter is to explain how Jesus fulfilled the prophecies related to his locative origins and tell us how Jesus ended up coming from Nazareth. One criticism that was leveled against Jesus was that no prophet ever arose out of that area (John 7:52). Matthew proceeds to not only show that Jesus fulfilled the prophecies but that indeed the scriptures do speak of a prophet coming from that location.

Vs 1 – Jesus’ coming out of Nazareth happened by way of Herod’s evil choices and Herod’s evil choices occur due to the information gleaned from the coming of the wise men. Hence that is where Matthew commences with answering the question, namely, the story of how the wise men came into contact with Herod.

These things occured, Matthew says, “after Jesus was born.” We need not make the mistake that many make today and suppose that at Jesus’ birth he was serendipitously surrounded by these men for the text clearly indicates otherwise. In fact, we find in verse eleven that Jesus had already been moved out of the manger and He along with Joseph and Mary were in a “house.”

Luke gives us more detail regarding the actual birth in Bethlehem. See Luke 2:1-20. Matthew, however, seems content with the fact that that is where he was born. The Jewish mind would be more interested in the fulfilled prophecies than in narrative of the birth itself.

“Herod the king” is the man history refers to as Herod the great, a misnomer if there ever was one. Herod was placed in this position by the Romans and had reigned for 34 years. This was NOT the same Herod to whom Pilate sent Jesus for judgment (Luke 23:7-12). The Herodian line of rulers was extensive and men with this name ruled in this area well through Paul’s journey to Rome.

Who were these wise men? The text says they came from the East. Likely they came from Babylon. While many returned from the Babylonian captivity under Ezra and Nehemiah’s leadership, many also stayed behind. As a result, a large Jewish community developed in the east to the extent that by the time of Jesus’ birth, Babylon was as much a center of Jewish learning as was Jerusalem. The Babylonian Talmud still stands today as an impressive reminder of the extent of Jewish influence in that region. While we cannot speak for certainly on who these individuals were, the likelihood is that they were Jewish.

Vs. 2 – They came to Jerusalem to meet with Herod in order to locate Jesus’ precise whereabouts, hence their question. Evidently they were people of repute, for Herod seems to roll out the red carpet for them. One has to wonder, however, if he did not do such merely under pretense of seeking Jesus’ destruction.

They refer to Jesus as “King of the Jews.” Matthew, having established Jesus royal lineage, now seeks to establish the fact of Jesus Kingship. Matthew makes reference to this fact several times in his narrative (Matthew 5:35, 21:5, 25:34, 40, 27:11, 29, 37, 42). Matthew is concerned about presenting Jesus as King and preaching the gospel of the King’s kingdom (Matthew 4:23). This was very appealing to the Jewish mind.

The wise men saw Jesus star and followed it. The star was not some heavenly body, nor some mere phantasm only in the mind of the viewers, but an actual miraculous work performed by God to lead the wise men to the precise location of Jesus. Verse 9 says that it lead them precisely to Jesus location and “came to rest” over where He was. No mere heavenly body could so perform. No mere phenomenon could be so precise.

The wise men came for the purpose of worship. The word worship literally means to fall before another prostrate. It has as much reference to the position of the worshipper as to the attitude. When one worships he displays deep through his actions deep honor, homage, and respect toward his object through peculiarly devoted actions. This is precisely what the wise men did when they finally met Jesus.

Vs. 3 – Herod was troubled because of the perceived threat to his throne. He, of course, makes the same mistake that many made and make regarding Jesus, namely, that Jesus purpose was to establish an earthly kingdom and sit upon it’s earthly throne. Jesus clearly states that this never was his purpose in John 18:36: “My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.” Why individuals wish to continue to make the same mistake as did Herod, I will never fathom.

All Jerusalem was troubled because Herod was troubled. Here is a man who was notorious for evil and wickedness. He had no reservations at murdering his own family to maintain control of the throne and proved it on numerous occasions. When he was upset, then bad things usually followed. Such would prove true in this case as well.

Vs. 4 – Herod wanted to know where this king would be born. Matthew says he inquired regarding “Christ” or “Messiah.” The Messiah had been expected for years among the Jews, yet none had yet proven himself to be worthy of fulfilling the prophecies. Herod wanted to know what those prophecies were, so he inquired of those who knew, the chief priests and scribes. One has to wonder whether the chief priests and scribes didn’t cooperate willingly given their eventual attitude toward Jesus. They were envious of power (Matthew 27:18). What Herod failed to accomplish at the beginning of Jesus’ life, they finished up at its end (Matthew 27:20, 41).

These knew what the scriptures said regarding the birth place of the Messiah and so they answered Herod’s question.

Vss. 5, 6 – The answer came from the prophet Micah (5:2), “But thou, Beth-lehem Ephrathah, which art little to be among the thousands of Judah, out of thee shall one come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth are from of old, from everlasting.” This they rightly interpreted to be the birth place of the Messiah. The chief priests and scribes knew what the prophets said. But upon more than one occasion Jesus had to call this to their attention (Matthew 21:42, Matthew 22:39). Such prompted the scribes to ask regarding Jesus “How knoweth this man letters, having never learned?” (John 7:15) It is sad indeed that they would acknowledge Jesus understanding of the scriptures, yet not obey them.

Bethlehem means “house of bread.” It was an appropriate birth place for the one who was the bread of life (John 6:35,48). Jesus was indeed the governor that would rule his people. See Isaiah 9:6. See comments on 1:21 for “his people.” Today, Jesus is King of kings and Lord of lords (1 Timothy 6:15) and ruling in his government from his throne on the right hand of the Father (Acts 2:30, 33).

Vs. 7 – He privately calls the wise men to him so as to maintain secrecy regarding the information. Were it to get out and be known that the Messiah was born in Bethlehem, Herod would have political turmoil on his hands. The Maccabean revolts were fresh history and the Jewish people strongly resented being under Roman rule. Any news of a Messiah would be quite welcome and might be the catalyst to more bloodshed. Herod would just as soon avoid such a situation if he can help it.

He wanted to know when the star appeared so he would have the information that he needed in order to locate Jesus himself, but not for honorable purposes.

Vs. 8 – Herod sent these wise men on their way with instructions to tell Herod where Jesus was located. He had no intention of worshipping him himself, but he told this lie to the wise men to explain why he wanted such information. The wise men must have believed him, for it was their intention to so return, but they were warned not to by God. Herein is a great lesson for us. The pure most frequently accept the word of the wicked because they assume that all men’s intentions are good. This is not a character fault of the good, but something worthy of praise. Paul wrote to Titus (1:15), “To the pure all things are pure: but to them that are defiled and unbelieving nothing is pure; but both their mind and their conscience are defiled.”

Why didn’t Herod go with these wise men if he so desired to worship Jesus? Likely he was concerned at offending these foreign dignitaries when they learned his true purposes. While Herod was a wicked manipulator and malevolent dictator, he was no political fool. If he had offended these men from the east word would likely get back to Rome. He, like Pilate, knew that Rome best not be bothered by such trifles, so he bides his time. His inaction gives Joseph and Mary opportunity to flee thus proving that the best laid plans of men are often and handily foiled by God.

Again, it is interesting to note that Herod calls Jesus a “young child” at this time. The wise men didn’ show up at his birth, but a few years after.

Vs. 9 – For comments on the star, see verse two. The star reappears to guide them to the appropriate location. This Greek text is somewhat ambiguous here and so are some English translations. Upon casual glance it may appear that the star is now in the east. That’s not the case. It is now almost due south of the wise men. Neither is it the case that they saw the star initially in the east or when it rose as some translations and commentators suggest. Rather, it is the case that they, while being in the east themselves, saw the star. Hence, it is the same star that they saw while they were in the east.

Why did it not guide them there to begin with? First, it was necessary for the wise men to make their presence known in Jerusalem. The arrival of dignitaries in Jerusalem would have been a significant local event and a matter of public record. It is an event that many would remember. This is corroboratory evidence that Jesus was born in Bethlehem according to the prophecies. The Jews who read Matthew’s account would either remember this event themselves or would know someone to ask who would remember it, thus confirming Matthew’s story. Second, Herod’s pause for the sake of the wise men allowed Joseph and Mary enough time to depart Bethlehem for Egypt when they heard of Herod’s plans. Had Herod heard that the wise men went directly to Bethlehem, he may have captured Jesus and his family. No doubt God could have prevented this in some other way, but that may have cancelled the wise men’s visit. Third, this was done to fulfill the prophecy regarding Jesus coming out of Egypt. Again, had Herod known in some other way, he might have prevented them from going to Egypt. God’s wisdom in the entire affair is greatly shown.

Vs. 10 – Matthew describes their joy as exceedingly great upon reacquisition of the star. They were delighted that they would soon be able to see this Child-King of prophecy. The coming of the Messiah was no mean event; for centuries the Jewish people had longed to see this day. Even of Abraham Jesus said, “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day; and he saw it, and was glad” (John 8:56). It was appropriate for them to so rejoice, for so also did God’s angels when they heard of His birth (Luke 2:13,14). They were glad too that they did not have to spend a great deal of time conducting a search per Herod’s instructions. They were thus able to conduct their business quickly and with expedience. This further foiled Herod’s plan.

Vs. 11 – Jesus was no longer in a manger, but a “house.” He is again described as a “young child” indicating that he was no longer an infant. Here they “fall down” to do so. This posture is implied in the Greek word for worship itself. For comments on worship see verse 2. We need not necessarily think that gold, frankincense, and myrrh, were the only gifts that were offered. Perhaps these were the most costly and thus the most notable. The text, however, says that they opened their “treasures” and offered “gifts.”

Most also assume from this passage that because three gifts are mentioned that there were only three wise men, however, the Bible never says such a thing. We have no record as to the number of wise men that came.

One need not explain the value of gold for it is still prized today. It was used to adorn and decorate God’s temple and its vessels (Exodus 25:39). Frankincense was a resin with a fragrant smell. When ground up to powder it could be burned as incense. It was also used in divine service. Compare Isaiah 60:6. Myrrh was a holy ingredient used in anointing oil (Exodus 30:23), yet another item of divine service. It was also fragrant and was used as perfume. Each of these three gifts were somehow related to the worship of God under the Old Economy and were thus appropriate for the occasion. Today, under the New Covenant, we don’t concern ourselves with such things as our worship is directed to be in “spirit and in truth” (John 4:24).

Vs. 12 – God knew Herod’s plan and so they were warned not to go back to him. They obeyed and left by another road. See comments on verse nine. We don’t know how long the wise men stayed with Jesus; to read the text it doesn’t appear as if they were there for long, perhaps an evening or two. No doubt they would have wanted to hear Mary’s memoirs regarding the conception and birth and rejoice in that knowledge, but we have no direct information regarding their conversation. It is sad that evil men so often interrupt the good fellowship of the saints with their diabolical schemes, as was the case here. But there is coming a day when that fellowship will be disrupted no more (Revelation 22:2).

Posted in Kevin Cauley | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Matthew 2 – Wise Men

The Prayer of an “Old Preacher”

The Prayer of an “Old Preacher”

We may not think of that shepherd boy as a preacher, but perhaps we should. When David arrived at the battlefront, almost every word he spoke proclaimed the power and majesty of God. His words give great insight into the heart that God described as being like His own heart. David’s older brother saw him as a youth who had abandoned the sheep and said David was filled with pride and was insolent in his heart (1 Sam. 7:28). But he was wrong.

David, shepherd preacher?

David, shepherd preacher?

That young man had seen the providence of God when he killed a bear and a lion who were ready to kill a helpless lamb. David knew God’s nature and the challenge of Goliath had to be answered. He was not concerned about how big that giant was, for he knew how big God was!

As a youth he had also faced sin’s temptation and dealt with it. He showed how a young man could cleanse his heart “by taking heed according to Your word” (Psa. 119:9). It was in the sheepfold that he learned of God’s green pastures, still waters, the rod, the staff and the cup overflowing with oil.

Yet he was not always a young man. His words in Psalm 71:17-18 give us great insight into the devotion he had first as a youth and the devotion he had in his old age. Look at the words of that psalm.

“O God, You have taught me from my youth;

And to this day I declare Your wondrous works.”

David knew God from his youth and he had declared God’s glory to others. He knew God and he unashamedly taught others about Him. What was he like as he grew old?

“Now also when I am old and grayheaded,

O God, do not forsake me,

Until I declare Your strength to this generation,

Your power to everyone who is to come.” 

David understood that the truths which he had used to cleanse his young heart were the same truths that following generations needed to cleanse their hearts. They needed them because God’s words are eternal and truth does not change. David said, “The entirety of Your word is truth and every one of Your righteous judgments endures forever” (Psa. 119:160). He had taught those truths as a young man and now as he grew old he asked God to continue using him.

Read his words again. Every generation needed God’s words, and David emphasized that that needed the entirety of His words—every single one of His righteous judgments. Mankind does not change. The needs of every generation are the same. God’s remedy for sin does not change.

It was an older generation who taught young David. He owed them a great debt. The same is true of you!

Posted in Dan Jenkins | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Prayer of an “Old Preacher”

DIOS VE ALMAS

DIOS VE ALMAS

De tiempo en tiempo se torna muy difícil para nosotros pensar espiritualmente. Es muy natural ver a alguien y sacar conclusiones por lo que vivimos, pero amigo  mío Dios ve almas. Para nadie es un secreto que hay algunos países donde el asunto del racismo es un pecado de cada día pero no es eso lo peor sino que cientos de personas no lo ven como pecado, ¡Eso sí es preocupante en extremo!. 

DIOS VE ALMAS

DIOS VE ALMAS

Recientemente en un viaje misionero a Nicaragua, uno puede entender que este país es uno de los más pobres del continente Americano. Es realmente doloroso cuando extranjeros sufren muchos abusos únicamente por no pertenecer a ese país determinado independientemente si está ahí legal o ilegal (No estoy Justificando la ilegalidad) el trato debe de ser un trato de respeto y amor, por la sencilla razón que se trata de un alma. La condición de un esclavo es otro ejemplo vívido. En el Nuevo Testamento el Espíritu Santo nos ha dejado la carta a  Filemón para provecho nuestro, aunque Onésimo era un esclavo Filemón debía tratarlo y recibirlo como hermano en Cristo, Pablo confiaba que iba a hacer más de lo que le había escrito (V21), ¡Cuan bello ejemplo para nosotros!. Realmente debemos aprender a no ver lo externo de las personas sino a ver almas. 

La Iglesia de Jesucristo de los Santos de los últimos días (mormones), creen que los negros son hijos de Lucifer y que jamás podrán alcanzar salvación, note:

     “Y la piel de los lamanitas era obscura, conforme a la señal que fue puesta sobre sus padres, la cual fue una maldición sobre ellos por motivo de su transgresión y su rebeldía en contra de sus hermanos, Nefi, Jacob, José y Sam, que fueron hombres justos y santos”. (Libro de Mormón, Alma 3:6)

Parece ser que el libro de mormón tiene un fuerte conflicto con la Biblia la verdadera palabra de Dios inspirada. Aquel Simón de Cirene que ayudó al Señor Jesus a llevar su pesada Cruz al calvario, muy probablemente sea de quien se refiere Lucas en Hechos 13:1 “…Simon el que se llamaba Niger…” quien era uno de los maestros de la Iglesia en Antioquia. La raíz de la traducción de la palabra “Niger” concluimos de la misma manera que lo hace Adam Clarke, él dice que, era Simon el Negro. Tal vez por su contextura, color de cabello o de piel como sobrenombre era llamado Simon el Negro. Era también el padre de Alejandro y Rufo (Marcos 15:21) y Rufo luego pasaría a ser parte de la Iglesia del Señor (Romanos 16:13). ¿ Un negro en la Iglesia, y aparte maestro de la Iglesia en Antioquia con Hijos Negros? … Seguramente esa no era la iglesia mormona sino la Iglesia de Cristo en Antioquia,  ni tampoco el Dios de los mormones. El libro de mormón se contradice porque no viene de Dios por el contrario la Biblia no se contradice porque no contiene errores y al Dios a quien sirvo no hace acepción de personas( Hechos 10:34-35).

Con todo algunos se empeñan en marcar la diferencia donde Dios no lo hace. Al principio Dios solamente creo a la raza humana; al hombre, pero después de la dispersión en Babel (Genesis 11), tenemos la diferencia de idiomas pero no de raza, porque seguimos siendo la raza humana. En el pasado la segunda guerra mundial fue causada por hacer creer a un país que eran una raza superior al mundo (Alemanes) y me pregunto: ¿cuantos cristianos hoy en día se sienten superiores a otros en este sentido?Tal vez por el país donde viven, por el color de piel, por los recursos económicos, por la educación etc… Dios no se impresiona por ningún titulo nuestro. La salvación de Dios no está basada en ninguno de estos méritos sino más bien en la obediencia que cada persona le muestre a El, cada individuo elige por sí mismo (Josué 24:15; Isaías 7:16; Ezequiel 18:20; Mateo 23:37; Apocalipsis 22:17) y gracias sean dadas a él porque este es el caso.

La Iglesia del primer siglo también atravesó varias dificultades para correr la cortina de diferencias exteriores a saber;Gentiles y Judíos. Pablo se dirige a corregir este pecado  Efesios 2 y Colosenses 2 aborda el tema ampliamente mostrándoles que la pared de división, Cristo la había eliminado en la cruz. La carta a los romanos es casi en su totalidad dirigida en este misma dirección. Nosotros debemos de amar a las almas más allá de los que veamos al exterior, Recuerde Dios ve almas. A causa del maravilloso amor de Dios para todos los seres humanos, Él no desea que nadie perezca, sino que todos procedan al arrepentimiento (2 Pedro 3:9; cf. 1 Timoteo 2:4).“Y si invocáis por Padre a aquel que sin acepción de personas juzga según la obra de cada uno, conducíos en temor todo el tiempo de vuestra peregrinación”.1 Pedro 1:17

Posted in Heiner Montealto | Tagged | Comments Off on DIOS VE ALMAS