Every Kingdom Divided

Understanding What is Happening

The words of Jesus have never had more meaning. “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and every city or house divided against itself will not stand” (Matt. 12:25). Those who fully understand the impact of the Lord’s words can see that the clouds which are all around us are just a foretaste of the coming storm.

Our nation is divided.

Our nation is divided.

Our nation is divided. We are divided politically, but this division is so meaningless when compared to the other divisions which permeate our land. Of far great importance is the moral division among us. The definition of sexual perversion used fifty years ago no longer applies to us. That which was once perversion is often the common practice in our culture today. Paul described the decadence of the Roman world. “Those who practice such things…not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them” (Rom. 1:31).  The Roman world is now our world!

Our homes in this land are divided—even in many homes where parents outwardly embrace Christianity. The psalmist was not talking about a physical building when he said, “Unless the Lord builds the house, those who build it labor in vain” (Psa. 127:1). He was talking about our families, our homes. Unless the Lord builds our homes, we labor in vain! What has happened in this land? The creator who ordained marriage and the home is ignored. We have decided our own ideas about marriage are far better than anything He said.

To show the division in our homes, consider the following questions. Has there ever been a time when husbands were more selfish and self-seeking? What has happened to those words spoken in the sinless world of Adam about his wife being “…bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh”?  Paul said that no man ever hated his own flesh, but nourished it. Yet, when men fail to see their wives as their own flesh, there is no nourishing and cherishing.

Think of how so many wives would inwardly cringe when told they must honor and reverence their own husbands. These words were the precise words God gave to them (Eph. 5:33). Yet, we live in a time when wives openly mock their husbands.

Our homes are divided over the values we impart to our children. They fail to see parents having the church first in their lives, and manifesting that the whole duty of man is to fear God and honor him (Matt. 6:33; Ecc. 12:13).

When nations are divided, desolation lies ahead. When homes are divided, they will not stand. What can we do? What is the solution to all of this? The answer is found in each of us humbly recommitting our devotion to God in relationship to self, to our nation and to our homes. God help us!

Posted in Dan Jenkins | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Every Kingdom Divided

Changing Taste

Changing Taste

As a boy growing up in north west Texas my family did what others would consider strange. At best, strange. When Momma had finished brewing coffee for her and Daddy, we kids would often take the grounds and chew them. Okay, really strange. However, with this early introduction to the taste of coffee, I learned to love the taste of coffee. I enjoyed coffee so much that I would drink it hot, cold or lukewarm – the stronger, the better. My coffee would always be black with no sugar or any other taste to enhance it. I loved coffee. Two twelve cup pots a day was usual. But something happened. I don’t know how or why, but something happened. One morning I woke up and the taste of coffee turned my stomach. I don’t like the taste of coffee. Friends and relatives told my wife to have my DNA checked to see if this really was Foy. I have also often heard of other people who, when they had grown older their tastes in many things changed – from fashion to hair style to food and drink. Okay, so what?

The gospel is not a matter of taste, but truth and salvation.

The gospel is not a matter of taste, but truth and salvation.

If there is nothing but personal taste to determine some situations, then each person’s taste are the only thing that matters. This is true, for the most part, with matters of food, clothes and hair styles. However, there are some matters which can not be adduced merely from personal likes, tastes. Matters of eternal significance must be determined by the highest, the revealed, standard given by the Eternal Divine Nature, GOD! Cain tried to determine his worship merely from his situation instead of following God’s directives, Genesis 4:3-7. Cain’s unauthorized worship led to murder and exile. Morality based on the feelings of the moment, by king David of Israel, rather than God’s directives, led not only to adultery and murder but also to the death of a child, 2 Sam. 11:2-12:18. Biblical examples could be multiplied. Moreover, in the New Testament we find Christians turning from honesty which God ordained and a husband and wife, Ananias and Sapphira, suffering both the humiliation of Divine wrath but also physical death, Acts 1-11. The Divine standard does not change, regardless of human taste.

I also grew up in a family where music was everywhere. Momma sang ditties and great songs. We all sang secular songs and spiritual songs. Momma played the ukulele. In college I learned to play the trombone and took some lessons in piano. I loved listening to the “big band” sounds of famous orchestras. When I came to the New Testament, the last will and testament of Jesus Christ, Heb. 9:15-17; 10:9-10, it was immediately obvious that God said “sing,” Eph. 5:19; Col. 3:16; Heb. 13:15 AND that God intended this for psalms, hymns and spiritual songs wherever and whenever they were used, James 5:13. Now, my personal tastes no longer have any value because God has spoken. The truth will not change so I must change my tastes to match the truth.

I have often wondered what it would be like to stand before Jesus in the judgment, 2 Cor. 5:10, and try to explain to him why I thought my tastes were of more value than His and why He should accept what I like rather than what He said. If Matthew 28:18-20 is true AND IT IS, then we must observe what Jesus said and that’s all. Tastes change. The New Testament does not change.

Foy Forehand

Posted in Guest Authors | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Changing Taste

Judas: Betrayer or Confidant?

Judas: Betrayer or Confidant?

Skeptics and atheists have unleashed yet another assault on Christianity. Just days after proclaiming that maybe Jesus walked on ice instead of water, we are now asked to believe that the betrayer of Jesus was a good guy. This latest charge stems around thirteen papyrus sheets bound in a leather covering that were found in a cave in Egypt. This ancient text is being referred to as “the gospel of Judas.” And so once again we find the media more than willing to plant seeds of doubt—insinuating that the Bible is incomplete and misrepresents the man who betrayed Jesus.

God’s Word describes Judas as a thief (John 12:6)

God’s Word describes Judas as a thief (John 12:6)

The controversy stems around part of the manuscript in which Judas allegedly is given private instruction by Jesus, and is granted a vision into what the future holds for Jesus. One key passage has Jesus telling Judas: “you will exceed all of them. For you will sacrifice the man that clothes me.” Thus, rather than acting out of greed or malevolence, he was simply following the “plan” that he and Jesus had prearranged—a plan that could be viewed as deceptive, a label Jesus would never wear.

Undoubtedly, this front page news story will have many questioning the authenticity and accuracy of the Bible. Did Jesus really walk on ice rather than water? Was Judas really in cahoots with Jesus? Many will second guess whether the gospel accounts they have learned are indeed accurate—placing more faith in this “front page” story than the infallible Word of God. Satan must be thrilled to have the popular media on his side.

If nothing else is gleaned from this latest round of attacks on God’s Word, we Christians should rest assured the Bible is complete. God in His infinite wisdom through inspired men was able to get His Word into our hands. We can know that the Bible we are holding today is exactly what He intended for us to hold.

Yes, the Judas codex may be authentic. And yes, it may have well been written between the suspected dates of 300-400 A.D. But this no way indicates that the Bible is incomplete or alters who Judas truly was. In responding to Jesus’ question as to who the angry mob was seeking, John 18:5 states: “They answered Him, ‘Jesus of Nazareth.’ Jesus said to them, ‘I am He.’ And Judas, who betrayed Him also stood with them.” God’s Word describes Judas as a thief (John 12:6), a betrayer on multiple occasions (e.g., Matthew 26; Mark 14; Luke 22; John 18) and we are told that Satan entered him (Luke 22:3). Would this confidant hang himself after throwing down those thirty pieces of silver—if he and Jesus were really just carrying out a plan? Does this sound like someone who would become the closest confidant to Jesus?

Given the amount of fiction writing today—it is not hard to speculate that this writing may well have been “fiction” or could have been written by someone who was seeking fame through controversy. No matter what others speculate, Christians can know that this “gospel” is not a part of God’s Word.  We have been given everything pertaining to life and godliness (2 Peter 1:3).

Posted in Brad Harrub | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Judas: Betrayer or Confidant?

LA INDESTRUCTIBILIDAD DE LA IGLESIA DE CRISTO?

PORQUE MATEO 16:18 NO ENSEÑA LA INDESTRUCTIBILIDAD DE LA IGLESIA DE CRISTO

Algunos han pensado de muchas maneras con respecto a este pasaje según Mateo. Hay tantas cosas y controversias al rededor de este pasaje: ¿Es Pedro la roca o es Jesús?¿Cual era la Iglesia que iba a edificar?…etc. Sin embargo lo que nos acerca a este pasaje en esta ocasión es el hecho, si Cristo prometió que la Iglesia Jamás iba a desaparecer de sobre la tierra. Antes de observar con detenimiento que enseña el pasaje en sí mismo, es trascendental primeramente examinar otro pasajes que tiene que ver con con la confusión y luego definir correctamente algunos conceptos.
 PRIMERO: LO QUE ENSEÑA DANIEL 2:44.  Una correcta aproximación a este pasaje, es echando una mirada primeramente al contexto histórico y al contexto inmediato antes de sacar cualquier conclusión o antes de hacer aplicaciones a futuro. Es irrefutable que el reino del que está mencionando Daniel en su profecía es en alusión a la Iglesia, sin embargo entendiendo el contexto, este reino no iba a ser dejado a otro reino como lo fueron; Babilonia, Medo-Persa, Grecia, etc… y aún como lo estaba siendo Israel. No sería Jamás destruido, entendemos  que este reino no podía ni iba a ser conquistado o reducido a cenizas como lo eran o más bien como iban a ser los cuatro que Daniel está mencionando. La razón principal es porque este reino iba a ser un reino espiritual, y Cristo afirmó tal cosa en Juan 18:36, esto es un hecho importante en esta profecía ya que los judíos esperaban algo terrenal (Jn. 6:15). Daniel bajo inspiración divina está revelando el carácter mismo de este reino, y ese carácter era espiritual. La última frase del V.44 “permanecerá para siempre”  del Hebreo “‘alam” y que según Strong, tal palabra puede también significar; tiempo indefinido o tiempo remoto, cuando está en adverbio puede ser leído como “por siempre”, o simplemente puede significar “viejo”. Esta parlaba aparece unas 20 ocaciones a travez de la Biblia  como tal y unas 325 ocaciones en otras formas. Hay que entender que la frase “Para siempre” no significa eterno, la Iglesia no ha sido eterna tuvo su comienzo .En Varios pasajes del A.T la frase “ Pacto perpetuo o pacto eterno” es expresada en referencia a el antiguo pacto (Gen 17:7, Nm 18:19, 1 Cr 16:17, Sa. 105:8, 111:5) pero ¿ En realidad fue eterno? Obviamente no fue eterno ya que tuvo su fin, con la venida de Cristo (Col 2:14-16, Efe 2:15-16, Hb. 8:9-13). Tal y como definió Strong ‘alam puede identificar tiempo indefinido, por lo tanto concluimos que fue eterno o perpetuo pero por solo cierto tiempo. Desde otro punto de vista los versículos anteriormente citados no han fallado ni están mintiendo en referencia al antiguo pacto. El pacto de Dios fue eterno mientras duró pero ¿Acasó eso garantizó la adoración a Dios siempre? De echo aunque el pacto estaba firme, hubo un momento en la historia  en el que por muchos años la adoración al Dios verdadero había desaparecido. Una mirada rápida a 2 Reyes 22:10 nos topamos con el hecho que desde los días de Ezequías hasta que llega Josías al poder, el libro de la ley de Dios estaba perdido, y sin libro no hay adoración, sin embargo la instrucción y la verdad continuaba estando allí, estaba contenida en esos papiros aunque durante todos esos años ellos no estaban “conectados”. Podemos entender el porqué en el versículo 11 el rey rasgó sus vestiduras. Regresando a Daniel y con todo esto en mente es mi convicción que este versículo no está asegurando la permanencia de la Iglesia de Cristo en nuestras comunidades. Ciertamente está asegurando que la Iglesia iba a ser establecida, una vez establecida nunca nadie iba a conquistarla y el concepto de una sola Iglesia no va a cambiar en la mente en la disposición o voluntad de Dios pero el hecho de mantener, sostener esa iglesia en la realidad, es el rol que nos corresponde a nosotros desempeñar y de ahí la tremenda responsabilidad que llevamos en nuestros hombros. Ya Dios hizo su parte estableciendo su Iglesia, revelando toda la verdad y preservando esta verdad para nosotros que jamás va a desaparecer a saber…la Biblia (1Ped 1:25) pero si usted piensa que Dios se va a asegurar de que la Iglesia de Cristo en el 2017 jamás desaparezca; ¡siéntese, tome palomitas de maíz y disfrute de la función… ! déjeme le adelanto la conclusión, al final de la película,  ruina porque la cosa ¡No es así!.
SEGUNDO: LO QUE EN REALIDAD ENSEÑA MATEO 16:18.  Esto es simple, Mateo 16:18 no enseña la indestructibilidad por el simple hecho que el Señor no estaba hablando de eso, no tenía esto en mente. Ahora ¿como sé yo eso? es básico por el contexto. Sin embargo hay que ampliar más la argumentación y mientras usted avanza en la lectura de este artículo ponga su mente en neutro, una mente preconcebida no podrá aproximarse apropiadamente a la verdad. Observe por ejemplo la explicación que el hermano Bobby  Liddell  reconocido predicador del evangelio, ofrece sobre este versículo, él dice: 
Las puertas del Hadez hacen referencia a las puertas de la muerte no iban a prevalecer frente al establecimiento de la Iglesia de Cristo, no iban a prevalecer frente a la profecía que acaba de hacer. El poder del Hadez no pudo retenerlo (Hch. 2:24-36; Rm. 1:4) El reino o la Iglesia  iba ser establecido con poder en los días de varios sobrevivientes de ese momento (Mc 9:1). (Estudios en Mateo editado por Dub McClish, Denton Lectures, 1995).
Teniendo un genuino respeto por el contexto de este versículo, esta es la explicación más lógica y más apropiada de lo que significa “y las puestas del Hadez, no prevalecerán contra ella”. Ciertamente así fue, el Señor cumplió sus palabras ya que nada pudo evitar el establecimiento de su Iglesia, sin embargo no significa que no hubo momentos críticos. Solamente piense usted, ¿Como se iba a establecer una Iglesia, con un apóstol ahorcado y los otros 11 amedrentados y esparcidos al observar al Maestro  de ellos colgado y muerto en un madero a las  afueras de la ciudad como uno de los peores malhechores? ¿ Piense, que persona iba a ser parte de una Iglesia así? Sin embargo Jesús había prometido establecer su Iglesia y con estas y más circunstancias adversas su palabra se iba a cumplir. En esto estaba pensando el Señor allá en Mateo 16, pero de ninguna manera estaba asegurando que la Iglesia jamás iba a desaparecer de la faz de la tierra.
De echo de regreso en la historia encontramos que este fue el caso con algunas Iglesias de Cristo. De acuerdo a la Arqueología en la región que modernamente conocemos comoTurquía, (antiguamente conocida como Asia menor), solamente quedan escombros de lo que fueron lugares de reunión de estas congregaciones. En Apocalipsis 2:5 por citar una de las varias referencias, la advertencia del Señor es “Arrepiéntete porque sino vendré pronto a ti  y quitaré tu candelero”. La arqueología entonces junto a estos pasajes respaldan la idea de que la Iglesia de Cristo NO es indestructible en un país especifico, en un continente o en el planeta. Si la Iglesia desaparece: ¿ De quién es la culpa? de Dios o de nosotros que nos tiramos para atrás en el sillón esperando que sea Dios quien tome toda la responsabilidad? ¡Que fácil!.
Es evidente a travez de las páginas del Nuevo Testamento que la responsabilidad de preservación de su Iglesia depende mucho de nosotros. Pasajes tales como Ef. 6 preguntamos: ¿Para que tomar toda la armadura de Dios si, El mismo prometió que la Iglesia no iba a desaparecer? ¿ Porqué contender ardientemente por la fe (como enseña Judas 3) que ya fue dada a los santos una sola vez, si al final es algo que le corresponde a Dios cuidar? ¿Me pregunto porqué razón Pablo hace llamar a los ancianos en Efeso y les encarga rigurosamente velar por el rebaño en el que el E.S los había puesto por obispos aclarando en el siguiente versículo que después de su partida iban a venir lobos rapaces, que no iban a perdonar el rebaño? ¿ Que significará la frase “No perdonarán al rebaño”?. Muy interesante esto ultimo dicho sea de paso ya que esta congregación y este ancianato que se le hace este encargo tan riguroso es la misma congregación de la que el Señor advierte y previene en Ap. 2:5 y que hoy no existe en ese lugar. Creo firmemente que el Señor puede hablar a cualquiera de nuestras congregaciones con las mismas palabras, obviamente a travez de las escrituras. Mateo 16:18 enseña en carácter profético lo Glorioso que iba a ser el establecimiento de la única Iglesia verdadera, solamente espero y oro que podamos andar como es digno de nuestra vocación (Ef. 4:1) para no manchar esa Gloria( Judas 12) y para no tener que ser cortados por el Señor.
Posted in Heiner Montealto | Tagged , , | Comments Off on LA INDESTRUCTIBILIDAD DE LA IGLESIA DE CRISTO?

Do Not Be Frightened!

Do Not Be Frightened!

Only be strong and very courageous, being careful to do according to all the law that Moses my servant commanded you. Do not turn from it to the right hand or to the left, that you may have good success wherever you go. This Book of the Law shall not depart from your mouth, but you shall meditate on it day and night, so that you may be careful to do according to all that is written in it. For then you will make your way prosperous, and then you will have good success. Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be frightened, and do not be dismayed, for the Lord your God is with you wherever you go.

Joshua 1:7-9

If Dwight Eisenhower stood in Joshua’s shoes, he would have much reason to be afraid.

If Dwight Eisenhower stood in Joshua’s shoes, he would have much reason to be afraid.

If Dwight Eisenhower stood in Joshua’s shoes, he would have much reason to be afraid.  Cross a body of water that separates you from the enemy’s terrain by…asking men carrying a box of gold to start to walk into it so that it will turn into dry land?? (Josh. 3:1ff)  Attack a walled, fortified city and cause its walls to fall down by…marching around it while playing music and shouting?? (Josh. 6:1ff)  I wonder how long it would have taken FDR to show Eisenhower the door if he had proposed similar battle plans for D-Day.  No wonder the Bible says Joshua and Israel did these things “by faith” (Heb. 11:30).

Here’s the thing, friends.  God has not asked us to perform miracles today like he did back then…but he HAS told us to abide by his Word and not turn from it just as he did with Joshua (Matt. 7:21-27; John 8:31-32; 14:15, 21, 23-24; 15:10, 14; Rom. 6:17-18; Heb. 5:9; 1 John 3:24; 5:2-3).  Of themselves, his commandments are not hard (1 John 5:3).  It is not inherently hard to submit to immersion for forgiveness of sins (Acts 2:38), to treat others as you would want to be treated (Matt. 7:12), to continually add to your faith the Christian attributes God would have you to possess (2 Pet. 1:5-11; Eph. 4:20-5:21), to worship in spirit and truth (John 4:24), and to bring the gospel to a lost world (Mark 16:15).  However, what often makes them hard for us to accomplish as we should is fear and discouragement, the very things God told Joshua to avoid.  Even though what he has told us to do is in itself much easier than marching around a walled city expecting it to fall with a shout, how often do we find it hard to share the gospel because of the fear of persecution?  How often do we find it difficult let our light shine in the way in which God wants because of dismay and discouragement (assuming prideful, stubborn, selfishness is not also a factor)?

What we must remember is that the same God who promised to be with Joshua and give him success in his endeavors to obey his will is also with us and has given us that same promise (Matt. 6:25-34; 28:18-20; Heb. 13:5b-6; 1 John 4:4).  Not only that, but he has promised us continual forgiveness if we become Christians through penitent baptism (Acts 2:38; 22:16) and then humbly confess and repent of our sins afterwards (1 John 1:7-9; Acts 8:22; 2 Cor. 7:9-11).  That means that we have an inheritance in eternal Heaven no matter what happens to us in this life!  (1 Pet. 1:3-7)  If we make our top priority being faithful citizens of his kingdom and being righteous in his sight (Matt. 6:33), he will supply for us what we truly need both in this life and in the next!  So let’s be strong and courageous…for God is with us as we stand for him!

Posted in Jon Mitchell | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Do Not Be Frightened!