Atonement and Sacrifices

Full Atonement With One Perfect Sacrifice

Whenever you think of the Day of Atonement just remember the importance of that day to the Jews. Each year on the tenth day of the seventh month, God remembered all of the sins of that nation. Atoning sacrifices were always connected with appeasing the wrath of God (see Numbers 16:41-46; 25:1-13), and it was imperative that this holy day of atonement be observed.

Atoning sacrifices were always connected with appeasing the wrath of God.

Atoning sacrifices were always connected with appeasing the wrath of God.

Now consider how the observance of this day would have impacted the infant church. There were 3,000 who obeyed the gospel on Pentecost and so many more afterwards. They were promised the remission of sins (Acts 2:38), and it became a visible reality in their lives just four months after Pentecost. The Jews assembled again for the next annual feast, the Feast of Tabernacles, observed each year on the first day of the seventh month, and the feast lasted for an entire week. Just two days after the feast ended, the Day of Atonement was kept. The high priests carried the blood of a bull and a goat into the Most Holy Place and assuaged the wrath of God by sprinkling the blood on the mercy seat.

Perhaps those Christians in Jerusalem would have on that day seen the difference between the blood of animals and the blood of Jesus. Every devout Jew would have been mindful of the blood carried by the priest that day, except those who had become Christians. They would have vividly seen the distinction now made between the two covenants. Christians did not need the blood of animals. Their salvation had nothing at all to do with the events happening in the temple. There was a new law, a new altar, a new priesthood and a new blood sacrifice. That Old Testament Day of Atonement had been superseded by a far greater day of true atonement.

The new priesthood was not the Levitical priesthood established by Moses. The new high priest did not need to first offer blood sacrifices for himself, for the new high priest was sinless. He did not need to offer a yearly atoning sacrifice, for Jesus’ blood obtained eternal redemption! The book of Hebrews sums it up with these words. “We have an altar from which those who serve the tabernacle have no right to eat. For the bodies of those animals, whose blood is brought into the sanctuary by the high priest for sin, are burned outside the camp. Therefore Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people with His own blood, suffered outside the gate.  Therefore let us go forth to Him, outside the camp, bearing His reproach. For here we have no continuing city, but we seek the one to come” (Heb. 13:10-14).

The words of a hymn say it all: “Full atonement, can it be? Hallelujah! What a Savior!”

Posted in Dan Jenkins | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Atonement and Sacrifices

CANTANDO DURANTE LA CENA DEL SEÑOR

CANTANDO DURANTE LA CENA DEL SEÑOR
Es muy frecuente escuchar en varias congregaciones un canto ser entonado durante la participación de la cena del Señor. ¿Es esto apropiado de observar o llevar a cabo? NO. No es y de hecho está mal. Hay congregaciones que lo realizan solamente en el acto de la ofrenda, sin embargo sigue estando igual de mal que en la cena. En primer lugar se debe de entender muy bien, ¿que es? la adoración a Dios y se debe de estar completamente convencidos de, que solamente existen 5 actos de adoración que Dios nos ha ordenado bajo el nuevo pacto que su hijo selló con precio de sangre en la Cruz. Dede de comprenderse a la perfección de, que la cena del Señor no es el acto principal de adoración de una congregación, ni que la predicación lo es, sino que todos y cada uno de ellos es de igual importancia y relevancia.

CANTANDO DURANTE LA CENA DEL SEÑOR?

CANTANDO DURANTE LA CENA DEL SEÑOR?

Por alguna extraña razón a veces se ha llegado a pensar que se debe de poner mucho más énfasis en la Santa Cena y muchos han caído al extremo de que cuando este acto llega: se apagan las luces y se encienden unas luces rojas muy bajitas y se comienza a cantar un himno solemne para preparar el “ambiente”. Cada uno de los actos de adoración son separados el uno del otro y al mismo tiempo igual de importantes el uno con el otro.  Cada acto de adoración envuelve actividad: física, mental, y espiritual  al participar de ellos. En 1Cor 11:23 en adelante que muy común mente se utiliza antes de la participación de la mesa del Señor, Pablo nos recuerda que esto se hace en conmemoración o en memoria del sacrificio del Señor. Es decir que los participantes deberán de estar adecuando su mente en ese sacrificio. El cantar durante la cena del Señor se convierte en un acto incorrecto a partir de las siguientes razones, le invitamos a que considere:

  1. La Situación Emocional: Cuando se introduce un canto en la cena es por alguna razón necesaria. No dudamos de las buenas intenciones de muchos hermanos, pero hay otros quienes creen que ya la participación de la santa cena cada semana puede tornarse en un “ritualismo” dicen ellos. En 1Cor 11:24 cuando se leemos “en memoria de mí”, permítame hacer notar que la frase no necesariamente implique sentir la emoción al hacerlo, sino más bien es algo que va más allá de las emociones, tiene que ver directamente con mi espíritu y mi mente. Quienes ven a la cena del Señor como un ritualismo que necesita ser mejorado, avivado con un canto, es porque quizás no han logrado comprender correctamente que significa hacerlo con la mente.
  2. La Incongruencia: Esta es demostrada por la lógica. Si la congregación puede cantar durante la celebración de la cena o durante la ofrenda entonces: ¿Porque no cantar durante el Sermón o durante una oración?. Bueno alguien pude responder: “¡Porque son actos muy consagrados donde se requiere de toda la consagración necesaria y 0 interrupciones!”. Para nada nos oponemos, pero el mismo principio debe de ser aplicado a la cena o la ofrenda.
  3. La Falta de autoridad: El Nuevo Testamento es nuestra maxima autoridad en religión hoy. No existe ningún mandamiento directo, ni tampoco un ejemplo aprobado y no hay una inferencia necesaria, por tal motivo es muy peligro obrar. Al igual que interpretamos el silencio de las escrituras sobre los instrumentos musicales en el N.T deberíamos de proceder con este tema. Es muy importante aclarar que en todo lo que se relacione a asuntos de opinión y que la Biblia guarde silencio, tenemos libertad de proceder a decidir y establecer con mucho cuidado cual sea lo mejor para todos. Pero al mismo tiempo que quede muy claro que este asunto  de cantar durante la celebración de la cena, no es un asunto de opinión, son los actos de adoración a nuestro Dios, ¡no puede de ninguna manera ser asunto de opinión.! 
  4. El Canto está en otro contexto: Tomar la cena mientras se canta o recoger la ofenda y cantar viola directamente el propósito, la manera y la metodología del canto. El canto a Dios está diseñado para que utilicemos el corazón en él (Ef 5:19, Col.3:16). Para cantar se requiere que el adorador ponga todas sus energías y se concentre en lo que esta cantando, esto es hacerlo con el espíritu y con el entendimiento (1Co 14:15). A demás es necesario que a la ora de cantar se haga como resultado del gozo interno que es expresado por los labios (Heb 13:15). Nosotros No hacemos música para alegrarnos, hacemos música porque nuestra alma se regocija en en las Buenas Nuevas de Dios (San. 5:13). El canto debe de incluir al menos tres cosas:  GOZO • EMOCION •DEVOCION. ¡Amigo simplemente es imposible llevar a cabo todo esto junto con la cena del Señor.!
  5. El Desorden: En 1Co 14:40 en las instrucciones varias para la Iglesia el Apóstol Pablo termina diciendo: “Hagace todo decentemente y en orden”. La palabra orden, incluso en este contexto tiene que ver con cada cosa esperando su turno. No hay razón lo suficientemente fuerte para apresurar el servicio de adoración mezclándolos. En cualquier caso eso es bíblicamente llamado como desorden y está condenado por Dios.
Aún después de presentar 5 fuertes razones habrán muchos que no verán en ellas suficiente peso para dejar de practicarlo. Cada cristiano en especial el liderazgo debe de preocuparse bastante para que la adoración a Dios sea pura y sea tal como El la especificó. Al final el Padre está buscando adoradores que le adoren en espíritu y en verdad (Juan 4:23-24).
Posted in Heiner Montealto | Tagged , | Comments Off on CANTANDO DURANTE LA CENA DEL SEÑOR

The Prophetic Word

The Prophetic Word

And we have something more sure, the prophetic word, to which you will do well to pay attention as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts, knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone’s own interpretation. For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.

2 Peter 1:19-21

The prophetic Word is God's Words shared through the Holy Spirit.

The prophetic Word is God’s Words shared through the Holy Spirit.

“The prophetic word.”  I like how Peter put that.  When we think of terms like “prophecy” or “prophet,” we usually think of someone miraculously foretelling the future.  And while we do read of prophets foretelling of things to come (cf. Is. 53), we also read of prophets referring to the past (as Moses did when he wrote about the creation events of Genesis) and some referring to what they observed while they were presently living (as Amos did – Amos 1:1ff).  Therefore, a “prophet” who gives “prophecies” is certainly more than someone foretelling the future…and rightfully so, because the term prophecy literally refers to a message spoken on behalf of God and a prophet is literally one who speaks on behalf of God.

Thus, it is proper that Peter talks about “the prophetic word” and prophecies of Scripture.”   When we read the Bible, we are reading a message from God.  When we hear a sermon that has its basis completely on the entirety of Scripture concerning a topic, we are hearing a message from God (1 Thess. 2:13).  The writers of Scripture were inspired or carried along by the Holy Spirit of God.  In other words, God told them what to write.  No wonder we call the Bible the Word of God!

Even verse 20, a verse commonly used by Catholics to tell people, “You can’t figure the Bible out on your own!  You need the Catholic Church to tell you what it means!”, is in reality promoting this idea that Scripture originated from God.  (By the way, the Bereans sure wouldn’t have fit in with that Catholic mindset – Acts 17:11).  The word “interpretation” literally means “a loosening, unloosing” and only metaphorically refers to “interpretation.”  Therefore, what Peter is literally saying is that no prophecy of Scripture was ever loosened or unloosed by some man (v. 20), because no prophecy was ever produced by man’s will; rather, the writers of Scripture spoke from God due to being inspired by his Spirit (v. 21).

Basically, when you read Scripture you are not reading a message that came from man.  You are reading a message from God.  May we all recognize that and respond with the proper reverence (Heb. 12:28) and obedience (John 14:15).

Posted in Jon Mitchell | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Prophetic Word

Does Man have an Immortal Soul?

Does Man have an Immortal Soul?

The question of life after death is a common theme in many cultures today. It is a question that has been discussed by poets, artists, philosophers, and scientists. It is a question asked by each and every individual living upon the face of the earth. One of the first things that we are made aware of within life is the certainty of death. So what lies beyond death is naturally one of the most compelling questions a person can pose. Does the Bible teach that when a person dies that they are merely extinct? Lifeless? Soulless? Or does the Bible teach that after death our soul remains alive and exists independently of our bodies? Let’s examine these questions in light of Bible teaching.

Is the soul of man immortal?

Is the soul of man immortal?

Does man even have a soul? There are some who state that the soul of man is nothing more than the life of man. By this they mean to suggest that there is nothing different between a man and an animal insofar as the soul is concerned. One of their favorite passages is Proverbs 12:10 which uses the same word that is translated “soul” to describe the life of a beast. By this they mean to suggest that “soul” is merely one’s “life-force” and has nothing to do with anything other than the physical body. It is true that there are many passages within the Bible where “soul” means “life” and the two words can be used relatively interchangeably. However, the studious will do well to note that words often have more than one meaning and can be used in different senses. Such is the case for this word as well.

We find one such example in Leviticus 17:11. This passage says, “For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.” In this passage, the blood makes atonement for the soul. Was it merely for a person’s life that atonement was made? Since when does blood need to be shed to safeguard a person’s life-force? It should be clear to the conscientious that “soul” in this passage means more than just a life-force because it is something that is in need of atonement. We find another example in Leviticus 26:11. God says in this passage, “And I will set my tabernacle among you: and my soul shall not abhor you.” Here the word has reference to God himself. Does the word merely describe God’s “life-force?” To the contrary, the context is in regard to the presence of God among the children of Israel. We know that God is a Spirit (John 4:24), so “soul” in this context is not merely referring to some “life-force” as defined above since the word is attributed to God himself.

Perhaps the greatest demonstration that the soul is more than just man’s “life-force” begins in the prophetic passage Psalm 16:10. This passage states, “For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.” Peter quotes this passage in Acts 2:31 where he applies it to the soul of the resurrected Jesus. He says, “he (David) foreseeing this spake of the resurrection of the Christ, that neither was he left unto Hades, nor did his flesh see corruption.”ASV. Notice that Peter says that “he” was not left unto Hades and then he also says that his flesh did not see corruption. To Peter, the real Jesus was someone different from his flesh; Jesus had a soul. Now just exactly where was Jesus during this period of time that his body was in the tomb? Jesus’ own words to the thief on the cross tell us exactly where Jesus was, a place known as paradise (Luke 23:43). How do we know that Jesus was not really in heaven with the thief? Notice these two facts: First, Jesus said that he would be with the thief “today” in paradise. Second, when Mary saw Jesus after his resurrection, Jesus said that he had not yet ascended to the Father (John 20:17). Now if Jesus had seen the thief in the same day that he had died and if Jesus had gone to heaven to see him after his death, then Jesus would have already have ascended into heaven and would have had to come back down to ascend again. This is also confirmed for us in Ephesians 4:9 where it states, “Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?” This expression “lower parts of the earth” is a phrase that occurs in the Old Testament twice (Psalm 63:9; Isaiah 44:23) and refers to the place of the departed. Jesus descended to this place wherein is the realm of paradise and then Jesus ascended into heaven after having been resurrected from the dead. The inescapable conclusion is that the soul of Jesus was still alive and well while Jesus body was in the tomb.

Finally, we see that Jesus himself argued for the existence of the soul after death. He did so to the religious sect of the time known as the Sadducees. Acts 23:8 tells us what the Sadducees believed in this regard. “For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit�.” It is significant that the Sadducees believed that there were no spirits. In their view of things there were no “souls.” Sadducee doctrine was that when a person was dead, he had no spirit-form to depart from his body, but that all that was left of him was the dust from whence he came. Hence, the dead no longer existed according to the Sadducees. We see these views addressed in Matthew 22:23-33, Mark 12:18-27, and Luke 20:27-38. It is significant that Jesus addressed the whole of the Sadducees doctrine about the resurrection. That is, in the view of the Sadducess, there was no resurrection because there were no souls to resurrect. Jesus also answers the question about angels as well. In these passages, Jesus first tells the Sadducees that they knew neither the scriptures nor the power of God. He then answers their question regarding marriage in the resurrection by telling them that men would be like angels in the resurrection, without gender. Finally he deals with the doctrine of whether the dead have souls that are still living. If they do, then the implication of that fact is that they will one day be raised. In Matthew, Jesus is recorded as saying, “But as touching the resurrection of the dead�..” Mark records, “As touching the dead, that they rise�.” Luke writes, “Now that the dead are raised�.” In the next few verses, Jesus makes it clear that he is not talking about the raising of dead bodies, but of dead souls. How do we know this? Jesus takes God’s statement to Moses from Exodus 3:6 where God says, “I am the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob” and points out the tense of the verb, “I am.” It is present tense, meaning that God was, during the time of Moses, the God of the very much alive and well Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. But their bodies were dead, so how could they be alive? They were alive because they had an immortal soul. And so Jesus concludes, “God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.” The implication is that the souls of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were still alive after their death in the time of Moses and that, in fact, they were still alive in the time of Christ.

Yes, there is an immortal soul. Yes, the immortal souls of all of those who have gone before live right now in the place of the dead. Yes, one day those immortal souls will be resurrected to be rejoined with a new and immortal body (Acts 24:15). Those who do not believe in the existence of the immortal soul in the words of Jesus, “do greatly err” (Mark 12:27). The righteous will go into eternal life and the wicked unto eternal condemnation. Your immortal soul, dear friend, will be among those resurrected in that day. Make sure that your life is right with God today. Don’t “greatly err” from God’s word. Tomorrow may never come and your immortal soul may be eternally lost if you heed not his will.

Posted in Kevin Cauley | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Does Man have an Immortal Soul?

God and the Judges of Israel

God and the Judges of Israel

It is our plan to begin a study of the Judges of Israel in our Wednesday evening adult Bible class in a couple weeks. In preparing for that study two things come immediately to mind that we would do well to reflect on.

As in the time of the Judges, we must learn of God.

As in the time of the Judges, we must learn of God.

We are always just one generation away from a people that do not know the Lord or what He has done for us (Judges 2:10). Why did the children of Israel not know the Lord or what He had done for them? They hadn’t been taught! Despite the explicit command of God to teach the children (Deuteronomy 6:7). How well are we teaching our children? Why are so many leaving the church? They haven’t been taught!

The cycle (for Israel) begins and shows the nature and character of God: They disobey, they are punished, they cry out, a judge is raised up, they are delivered, there is peace, they disobey, and the cycle starts all over. We are often hard on the children of Israel, but how are we doing in comparison? But God is merciful, gracious, longsuffering, abundant in goodness and truth, keeping mercy for thousands, and forgiving iniquity, transgression, and sin (Exodus 34:6–7).

Be faithful my friends!

Posted in Tim Dooley | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on God and the Judges of Israel