The Book of John and Obedience

The Book of John and Obedience

My personal Bible studies are currently centered in the book of John.  This great New Testament book tells us the story of Jesus from the Apostle John’s perspective.  Unlike the other three accounts of Jesus’ ministry, John is a more intimate view.  The first twelve chapters of John focus on Jesus public life and the miracles that He did.  They culminate with Jesus’ raising Lazarus from the dead.  John gets very personal with Jesus in chapters 13-21 focusing on Jesus’ final words to the disciples before recounting His betrayal, trial, crucifixion, death, burial, and resurrection.

The book of John demonstrates obedience.

The book of John demonstrates obedience.

The book of John also focuses on Jesus’ teaching to a degree Matthew, Mark and Luke do not.  John’s focus on the teachings of Jesus is all designed to emphasize his conclusion in John 20:30-31: “And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book: But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name.”  John makes clear connections between Jesus’ miracles, His Identity, and the blessing of life through Him.  It is only the Son of God—who is God Himself—who can truly give life.

However, as amazing as the story of Jesus is in the book of John, life only comes to those who believe in Jesus truly.  This is not the kind of belief that does not confess Jesus as the Son of God (John 12:42); that is, life is not granted to those who love the praise of men more than they love the praise of God (John 12:43), but life is granted to those whose faith obeys fully as John 3:36 shows: “Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him” (ESV).  John does not conceive of a faith that does not obey.  God bless you, and I love you.

Posted in Kevin Cauley | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Book of John and Obedience

Respect for Each Other

Respect for Each Other

Our nation has changed in so many ways, and this is so evident in the respect we have for each other. This is reflected in the way we sometimes speak to others. Since the words which come from our lips show what is in our hearts, to solve the problem we need to change the way we see each other. Jesus said, “For out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks” (Matt. 12:34). The way we talk to each other should be that which edifies and builds up, and imparts “…grace to the hearers” (Eph. 4:29). How should we regard others as we speak with them? How do we show our respect for them?

Do your behaviors and words show respect?

Do your behaviors and words show respect?

Paul’s instruction to young Timothy illustrates the attitude of respect which should characterize each of us. Evidently, Timothy was faced with rebuking older men who were Christians and needed to make changes in their lives. Paul said, “Do not rebuke an older man, but exhort him as a father” (1 Tim. 5:1). The Greek word for “rebuke” in this passage literally means “to pound, to flatten, to strike with blows.” There is never a time for young men to look at older individuals and treat with disdain. Yet, so often in our day the respect for those who are older no longer exists.

Look at how the Holy Spirit of God described for this young man to deal with those older men in his world. There is never a time for harsh words from arrogant hearts to berate anyone. Paul told this young man to speak to those older as he would his own father.

Paul then turned his attention to the way Timothy was to speak to those near his own age or even younger. How should young men treat their peers? Deal with them as you would deal with your own brother. The term “brotherly love” says so much about the respect we must have for each other (Rom. 12:10; Heb. 13:1; 2 Pet. 1:7).

How should Timothy treat older women? Paul says he should have the same respect he gives his own mother (1 Tim. 5:2). That special place mothers have in our hearts reflects the attitude we need to have toward all older women.

Finally, Paul discusses the respect young men should have toward young women. They should be treated as sisters with all purity. Barnes’ commentary says it this way, “He was therefore to guard his heart with more than common vigilance in such circumstances and was to indulge in no word, or look or action which could be by any possibility construed as manifesting an improper state of feeling.”

Take time to apply these principles to every relationship and the respect we should have for each other. Respect everyone, older and younger, with the dignity God sees in them. It might not change the world, but it will change yours!

Posted in Dan Jenkins | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Respect for Each Other

Hypocritical Expression of Oppression

Hypocritical Expression of Oppression

It is one of the most incredibly transparent, insanely ridiculous, and infinitely hypocritical statements ever made, either in the history of humanity or seen written in the sacred Scriptures! After having Peter and John arrested for preaching Jesus, the elders, scribes, rulers, chief priests, high priest and his family and the council at large, then confronted, threatened, and commanded them not to teach God’s truth about Jesus anymore. After the apostles’ release, resumption of preaching Jesus as the Christ, and their subsequent recapture, they were once again set before the council (Acts 3-5). At that point, came this most incredibly transparent, insanely ridiculous, and infinitely hypocritical statement, shooting straight out of the high priest’s heart of hate and horrendously hypocritical lips: “Did we not strictly command you not to teach in this name? And look, you have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this man’s blood on us (See Acts 5:27-28)! And there it is! Look; these were some of the same, rich, proud, disconnected from reality, elitist and self-centered religious leaders which Jesus had told incredibly clearly, less than two months earlier – just prior to their having Him crucified that is – that due to their prideful hypocrisy, rejection of Him as the Messiah, and their refusal to accept and acknowledge the truth, that all of the righteous blood of God’s many messengers whom He had sent them over the centuries was about to come upon them (See Matthew 23:1-39).  These were also the same, rich, proud, disconnected from reality, elitist and self-centered religious leaders who had so stirred up the common people and caused such a riotous commotion amongst them that they eventually shrieked, shouted, and screamed at Pilate as he desperately sought to release Jesus, “His blood be on us and our children” (See Matthew 27:1-2, 11-26)!

Self declared victims of oppression kneeling in their suffering.

Self declared victims of oppression kneeling in their suffering.

And now, here they are in Acts 5:27-28, insanely unbelievably, and in the absolute height of their unholy and self-righteous hypocrisy, claiming that they are somehow totally and completely innocent in this matter! Here they stand together, united in their commonly-held and completely self-righteous ridiculousness, seeking to shift the blame off of themselves by claiming that it is somehow entirely the apostles’ fault for teaching any truth that even remotely exposes or points to them as guilty in even the slightest or smallest part or portion that is responsible for this national dilemma which they now find themselves embroiled in! That it is somehow all the apostles fault, for even hinting at anything that might even remotely suggest or be seen as seeking to blame them for any iota of the issue – WHEN IT IS TOTALLY, ENTIRELY, AND COMPLETELY THEM AT WHOSE FEET, THE TOTAL, ENTIRE, AND COMPLETE FAULT LIES, FOR HIS BLOOD BEING UPON THEM IN THE FIRST PLACE, AND FOR THE NATIONAL DILEMNA THEY NOW FIND THEMSELVES IN!

It becomes quickly obvious to me, that we see the same sort of unified and utterly ridiculous hypocrisy we read about in Acts 5:27-28, both alive, well, and thriving today, as scurrilously depicted on a particular, popular, sports magazine, the October 2017 issue cover of which is illustrated with some of today’s richest, proudest, apparently also most disconnected from reality elitist athletes, standing together with interlinked arms, while sporting the caption: “A Nation Divided; Sports United,” – like they are somehow totally and completely innocent regarding the current chaos and division in our country when it comes to our national anthem and all that it stands for, when in fact – IT IS THEY THEMSELVES AND THOSE LIKE THEM, WHO ARE MOST DEFINITELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR EXPANDING, AGGRAVATING, AND PERPETUATING THE PROBLEM!

Now, as a side-note, I understand that this particular magazine has to go to whatever outlandish, hypocritical, transparent and ridiculous lengths it deems necessary in order to seek to best protect and expand its financial assets and politically-correct persona. Their own immoral agenda has been crystal clear for years to anyone who had even a reasonable measure of common sense and morality, and who, at the same time, actually cared enough to notice. For example, although their February 2014 cover loudly and proudly featured the first openly homosexual player to enter the NFL draft while sporting a caption that pronounced America ready for such, I notice that when that player failed to maintain a place even on any NFL team’s practice squad and was subsequently cut and forced to leave the NFL just a few short months later, that they didn’t run a cover story with a caption that read “First Openly Homosexual Player To Be Cut From The NFL,” or, “America Is Definitely Not Ready For This.” Sadly, their open and outright hypocrisy and immorality seems to be both a well-documented as well as a ‘business as usual’ event. But this time, they may have even outdone themselves!

When you have a group of sickeningly-rich, incredibly elitist, and grossly overpaid and arrogant athlete millionaires (just because they can throw a ball where they want), making what amounts to more than 40 million dollars a year in some cases – think of it: FORTY MILLION DOLLARS A YEAR; YEAR, AFTER YEAR, AFTER YEAR, ETC – not counting the tens and sometimes hundreds of millions of dollars which they also make in endorsements, then protesting how “oppressive” America is to people of color – which most of these mega-millionaires who are making the most noises are – it is not even laughable. It is, in my humble opinion, simply one of the most blatant forms of hypocrisy since the don’t-blame-me-for-His-blood council of Acts 5!

If these mega, multi-millionaire, elitist athletes truly believe that this country – this country which has enabled and empowered them to live their sickeningly rich and lavish lifestyles in the first place – is such a terribly oppressive place to live for people of color such as so many of them who are complaining the loudest are, then why don’t they go live in a different country, like Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Mexico, or somewhere else comparable – while leaving their millions upon millions upon countless millions of U.S. dollars here of course, because after all, they were printed in, and stood for, such a terribly awful and oppressive country as America has apparently become in their opinion? Maybe then they’d realize that the U.S. doesn’t need a border wall to keep its citizens in because it’s such an oppressive place, but to keep illegal immigrants out because it’s such an awesome place! A place where any poor kid, no matter His ethnicity, skin color, religion or education level, can grow up to become a mega, multi-millionaire and world traveler, just because he can throw a ball where he wants to – just like them! (But of course we all know that that will never happen don’t we? We all know that that will never happen because it’s always all about the good old American dollars and nothing else, isn’t it? That’s why the current, very predictable, all-out attempts at damage control by the pro football powers that be, to try to convince the buying public that they’re not disrespectful of America’s military after the ‘kneel-downers’ during the anthem began to cost them paying advertisers and paying customers!)

However, they do have one thing right, and that is that there is indeed oppression in our country – oppression which they should truly stand up and fight against should they wish to show any shred of integrity or sincerity in their protest. The fact is, that you’ve got thousands upon untold thousands of hard-working, difference-making, ethnically and racially diverse military veterans, police officers, firefighters, plumbers, doctors, carpenters, truck drivers, office personnel, and etc, who get up and go to work and work hard every day to support their families. And since most of them may only make around $45,000 or so a year, many can’t really afford to take their families to even one pro game or two a year – let alone to purchase their children some of the grossly-overpriced products which these out of touch athletes endorse – just simply because of the millions, upon millions, upon millions and millions of dollars they receive for endorsement contracts while travelling around the country playing a kid’s game. Why, that’s some of the most real, unfair, and oppressive injustice in this country today! And it will take far more than some out of touch with reality, millionaire athletes’ totally disgusting disrespect for this country’s flag as they kneel at the playing of our national anthem, or stand arms interlocked on the cover of some sports magazine, to show any tiny shred or semblance of integrity at their even remotely caring about solving it. If they are so truly concerned about real oppression in this great country (which pays them untold millions of dollars for being entertainers only, while those whose work really matters make but a mere pittance by comparison), then rather than just merely looking for more personally promoting photo-ops and sports magazine cover visibility, here’s an idea: Why not go to their team’s ownership, and tell them they are cancelling their own five year, $200 million plus dollar contracts, and that they want to re-sign for $45,000 a year, so that those hard working Americans who make about the same for actually working for a living, and who have truly been oppressed by the overpriced ticket prices needed to pay for these athletes’ grossly-overpaid salaries, can then afford to occasionally come and see a game with their families. And then, they need to go offer to tear up their endorsement deals with their product companies, if those companies will in turn agree to reduce the price of their products proportionately so that the average everyday working family can actually start to afford them.

Or, how about this? If they are half as concerned with oppression and racial inequality in this country as they claim, then why don’t some of these rich, highly-visible, out of touch with reality elitist athletes who are squawking about how oppressive this great nation is to people just like themselves, really press for more equality? Why don’t they demand that in the interest of fairness and equality, that the teams they play for truly represent the American populace by being comprised of the same, exact, ethnic percentages as the national average? In other words, if a team were, let’s just say, ninety percent “black,” and ten percent “white,” and the national average were, let’s just say for example, 40%  black, and etc, then the team would have to adjust and cut and add players proportionately. I’m guessing that all of the sudden, most of those who never actually had to work an honest day’s labor in their entire lifetimes, and/or who certainly never suited up to go serve their country where real bombs and real bullets were really flying and real people were really dying, would prove to be not at all serious about legitimately standing against real inequality, injustice, and oppression in this country, wouldn’t you?

No, instead, some would rather lock arms – which costs them not one single cent to actually do something about the oppression they so proudly proclaim to care so much about – while continuing to promote and perpetuate the divisive national issue which one of them helped to create in the first place! And this, all the while, in the height of hypocritical absurdity, as they seek to convince others that it is this great country that is divided, while they didn’t have the first thing whatsoever to do with it – WHEN THEY ARE SOME OF THE ONES WHO ULTIMATELY STARTED AND ARE CONTINUING TO FUEL THE CURRENT CRISIS OF DISRESPECT! Please!

And please also… When a world champion athlete of color outright disrespects and publically rejects the invitation of a sitting white president to the White House to celebrate, but would probably have relished attending had the former black president still been there, then please don’t stand up and seek to sell the ridiculous notion to the American public that race has absolutely nothing to do with any of it or that it’s only this great country that’s racially divided. You, by your example (or at the very least the appearance of it) are helping fuel the very fire, racial strife, and division which you claim to so badly hate, while aggressively seeking to deny you had anything whatsoever to do with it. All of this, when you’re at the very forefront, and fanning the flames of this fiery inferno in the first place.

Now, I will readily admit that I did not personally vote for Donald Trump to be our next president. However, I must say I was incredibly impressed with his common-sense dis-invitation to those disrespectful ‘world-champion’ athletes who didn’t want to go to the White House to celebrate anyway. Good for him! It’s about time we had a leader with enough integrity, backbone, and common-sense to be willing to truly stand up to those who are acting like unruly and spoiled-rotten 5 year-old children who are throwing a major temper tantrum simply because they didn’t get their own way. Perhaps at some point, instead of inviting such ‘oppressed,’ elitist, multi-millionaire athletes to the White House to celebrate their entertainment only ‘achievements,’ both he and this great country will re-develop enough appreciation for the common, honest, hard-working and God-fearing family man upon whose back this great country was built and continues to thrive, to invite more of them to celebrate their achievements, contributions, and sacrifices – which actually do matter – to the White House instead.

But until then, and probably even after that, we’ll still have to be subjected to seeing such atrocities occasionally played out as multi-millionaire athletes hypocritically claiming to be united while the nation is the problem, when it is they themselves, by their own incredible and unbelievable disrespect of things such as our own national anthem, freedoms, benefits, and the highest office in the land or on the planet, who are at the very and visible forefront, of the continual perpetuation of such problems. The rich, hypocritical, and out of touch with the truth elitist leaders of Acts 5:27-28 certainly had nothing on them as far as I can see.

 

 

Posted in Doug Dingley | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Hypocritical Expression of Oppression

Be Spiritual

Be Spiritual

There is a lot of talk these days of people who claim to be “spiritual” but not “religious.” The problem with this mindset is that Paul, by inspiration of the Holy Spirit, declared the spiritual man to be the one who receives the things of the Spirit and brings forth the fruit of the Spirit.

Are you indeed spiritual?

Are you indeed spiritual?

One of the problems in the church at Corinth was division resulting from a lack of love and humility. They were following the preaching styles of men and not the message of Jesus. In chapter two Paul declares that there are “natural” men who do not receive the things of the Spirit and there are “spiritual” men who do. He chastises the Christians at Corinth for being neither, they were not “natural” nor “spiritual,” but “carnal.” Like little spiritual babies, that is, Christians who were acting like “natural” men and not “spiritual” men.

It would do us well to ask ourselves what manner of men are we? We are to be mature, spiritual, and faithful stewards of the spiritual things of God. Our giving, living, and loving should all reflect the fruit of the Spirit: “love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, [and] self-control” (Galatians 5:22–23). Be faithful!

Posted in Tim Dooley | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Be Spiritual

Baptism, Women, and Peripheral Reasoning

Baptism, Women, and Peripheral Reasoning

Peripheral Reasoning: The insidious idea that we can somehow circumvent the actual, factual, specific, contextual, cornerstone teaching on a given subject, by utilizing examples that only might, or in some cases, do not even apply to said subject at all – and still come to an accurate conclusion on the topic under discussion. An everyday illustration of such “peripheral reasoning” would be if one were seeking to learn about American football, and were given a booklet on the game and rules of American baseball, under the guise or premise that, “Well, after all, they’re both American sports, and they both require a ball, an offense, a defense, a team, a field, and uniforms.” But we all know that any conclusions regarding the rules of the game of football, gained from instructions specifically devoted to the rules of baseball, would be extremely suspect at best, and completely confusing and erroneous at worst.

The use of peripheral reasoning in religion is common.

The use of peripheral reasoning in religion is common.

The absolute essentiality of avoiding any such peripheral reasoning at all cost, is profusely and infinitely magnified and multiplied when exploring spiritual topics and commandments, which have eternal life and death implications (2 Timothy 2:14-19; 2 Peter 3:14-18). This is not a game! Eternal lives are on the line! Eternal souls stand to be lost! And yet, tragically, such peripheral reasoning on certain essential spiritual subjects, topics, and commandments abound today – to the total deception and destruction of any who might seek to justify their own, personal, pride and/or agenda driven deviation from God’s divinely inspired and eternally settled in heaven truth (2 Thessalonians 2:9-15; 2 Timothy 3:16-17; Psalm 119:89).

One prime example of such deadly, spiritual, peripheral reasoning, would be when one who has convinced themselves (in support of whatever personally-driven agenda they are seeking to promote, and despite what God’s word so clearly, concisely, and consistently states to the contrary) that water baptism has absolutely nothing to do with salvation – and then they bring up texts like John 3:16 as supposed “proof” of their point! Really? John 3:16 cannot be used to make any real, legitimate, scriptural point regarding baptism, as the subject itself is not even seen, mentioned, or remotely under consideration or contextual discussion therein! If one wants to truly understand the subject of baptism from God’s perspective, then they must begin with a thorough examination of the rock-solid, concrete, cornerstone texts which actually mention the word and/or specifically address the subject! They must begin with texts that were actually, literally, specifically written to instruct us about, and/or at least might include some form of the word “baptism” – or else they’re seeking to learn about ‘football’ from instruction on the rules of ‘baseball,’ and will wind up both completely confused and then finally, ultimately deceived.

Why are such people so afraid to begin with a thorough examination of the texts in Scripture that were specifically written to instruct us on baptism? Because those God-given  (2 Timothy 3:16-17), eternally settled in heaven (Psalm 119:89), divinely-inspired and dictated texts (2 Peter 1:20-21) such as: Matthew 28:18-20; Mark 16:16; Acts 2:38-41, 22:16; Romans 6:1-23; Galatians 3:26-26; Ephesians 4:4-6; Colossians 2:8-12; 1 Peter 3:21; and etc, all confirm the absolute essentiality of this act of faith known as baptism, without and before which, no sinner on earth can be saved under the new covenant according to the word of God.

And so, either in their biblically-ignorant lack of the knowledge of God and His righteous edicts (Romans 10:1-3), or else in their attempt to advance their own personal agenda, they begin with verses, reasonings, and applications that actually neither mention, nor have anything whatsoever to do with the specific subject under consideration! Now, perhaps in some cases, and in order to give themselves some semblance of the appearance of credibility they might possibly at least give a passing mention to a few of the cornerstone verses that were actually written to specifically address the subject at hand. But then they will usually move on very quickly after only a cursory glance, before the total, entire, and glaring truth of those texts has a chance to be seen, explored, emphasized, and obeyed.

Nowhere in the church today is such presumptuous, pride-driven, personal agenda promoting peripheral reasoning more prominent, than in the discussion of women and just exactly how God designed both them and their place to be within His Son’s one, New Testament church (Ephesians 4:4-6; Romans 16:16). This will be made very clearly and obviously evident from the upcoming discussion of just such an attempted defense of more female leadership in the church, in direct defiance of, and disobedience to, the divinely-inspired and required, written commandments of God. But before we get to that specific list, we will start out by seeking to “rightly divide the word of truth” (2 Timothy 2:15) and therefore begin with a brief (due to article length and space considerations) exploration of the actual two texts in the New Testament which do contain almighty God’s specific, exclusive, written and all-authoritative instruction, regarding this particular topic.

First Corinthians 14:33-37NKJV states: For God is not the author of confusion but of peace, as in all the churches of the saints. Let your women keep silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak; but they are to be submissive, as the law also says. And if they want to learn something, let them ask their own husbands at home; for it is shameful for women to speak in church. Or did the word of God come originally from you? Or was it you only that it reached? If anyone thinks himself to be a prophet or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things which I write to you are the commandments of the Lord.

Now, one of the first things some will do who do not want to have to deal with the simple, straightforward, and clearly stated scriptural truths that this text contains, is to seek to throw up a sinister smokescreen of questions that it doesn’t quite as clearly answer, so as to blur and/or circumvent all of the exact truth, that it does so clearly state. But it’s forever… firmly fixed the in the heavens (Psalm 119:89 ESV) truths are unavoidable, indisguisable, and irrevocable for those whose first, only, and absolute top priority is to please and serve God, instead of anyone or anything else. And at least three of those crystal-clear and inarguable truths are these:

  • This instruction is for all the churches of the saints; that is to say, in all regions, all ages, all cultures, and all times from then on forward and on into the future forevermore, just as is the one faith, once delivered, for all the saints prior to the end of the first century (See Jude 3). The only exception being congregational singing, simply because God – who Has all authority – said so (See: Ephesians 1:1, 5:19; Colossians 1:2, 3:16).
  • And although we do not, and cannot, know exactly what specific “law” he refers to when it comes to women remaining silent in the churches (i.e., “en ekklessia” in the Greek; literally, “in the assemblies,” which is what he has been addressing since about the middle of chapter 10), what we do know for absolute certain, is that they are still to keep silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak; but they are to be submissive…, just as both that law, PLUS the commandments of God, unquestionably state here.
  • And lastly, it is an indisputable, eternal, and inarguable fact, that these requirements are not based on, or biased by, anyone’s personal opinion, preference, or peripheral reasoning, but are absolutely and inarguably the commandments of the Lord. And both Matthew 15:1-9, as well as Mark 7:1-13, also make it abundantly clear, that to “lay aside,” “reject,” or make “of no effect” “the commandment of God,” in order to practice man-made and preferred traditions, renders any and all such resulting worship, as “vain.”

Our second, vital, essential, divinely-inspired and eternally-settled in heaven cornerstone text which is also specifically devoted to this particular topic, comes from 1 Timothy 2:8-15, wherein almighty God, through His divinely-inspired and Holy-Spirit driven instruction (John 16:7-15; 2 Peter 1:20-21) states: I desire therefore that the men pray everywhere, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting; in like manner also, that the women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with propriety and moderation, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or costly clothing, but, which is proper for women professing godliness, with good works. Let a woman learn in silence with all submission. And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence. For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression. Nevertheless she will be saved in childbearing if they continue in faith, love, and holiness, with self-control.

While some of the “smokescreen questions” regarding this text will be answered and cleared away in the upcoming discussion, several of this text’s eternally settled in heaven (Psalm 119:89) truths are also unavoidable, indisguisable, and irrevocable as well.

  • First off, we see that males leading (or lifting up holy hands) in prayer is in an everywhere context and time-frame as well.
  • Secondly, we clearly see that God directed the Apostle Paul to state that a woman [is not] to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence. To have authority over is obviously to take the lead over. Therefore, when women lead prayer, lead singing, preach, teach, or take the lead in any form or fashion over a man when it comes to these things, they are in direct and obvious violation, rebellion, and disobedience to this God-given, designed, and required pattern.
  • And perhaps the single most important and vital aspect of this entire text for our discussion today, is exactly what it does so clearly state in those last three verses, wherein God – appearing to anticipate today’s whole man-made ‘cultural’ argument and excuse for non-compliance with His commandment – lets us know in no uncertain, and certainly unmistakable terms, that this instruction ABSOLUTELY DOES NOT FLUXUATE WITH, NOR DEPEND UPON, ANY ERA, AREA, ARENA, AGE, OR CULTURE. He does this by taking us all the way back to the very beginning and showing that this order absolutely, unmistakably, and irrevocably transcends all ages, cultures, times and desires! Notice again, verses 11-15: Let a woman learn in silence with all submission. And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence. For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression. Nevertheless she will be saved in childbearing if they continue in faith, love, and holiness, with self-control.

How can this point possibly be missed? From the very beginning, God both created, designed, desired and determined two different genders (Genesis 1:27). And in His complete perfection, He also therefore designed, desired, and determined, incredibly different, exclusive, certain and specific roles for each of His two created genders to fill! This is true in both the physical, as well as the spiritual realm. And any violation of either of these divinely-designed and determined differences, is an utter abomination before Him (Leviticus 18:22, 20:13; Romans 1:18-32; 1 Corinthians 14:33-37). (This also means that any congregation or individual that would seek to justify breaking down God’s divinely designed distinctions between men and women in the spiritual realm (or church), must also be prepared to accept, defend, and justify breaking down God’s divinely designed distinctions between men and women in the physical or sexual realm as well, or else be found to be lost and floundering in total and hopeless hypocrisy.)

In addition, Jesus said “Scripture cannot be broken” (John 10:35). Therefore, any new doctrine, conclusion, or peripheral reasoning, which either confuses, contradicts, compromises or seeks to circumvent in any way, shape, or form, even the slightest portion of these two, divinely-inspired, cornerstone texts dealing very specifically and contextually with women in the Lord’s church, would be in direct violation of the commandments of the Lord and exactly what He specifically commanded regarding women, in all the churches of the saints, learning in silence, and not teaching or having authority over the men assembled there. And this, those who respect and revere God, dare never do (John 14:15-24; 2 Corinthians 4:2).

Neither are the above conclusions, which are gleaned from simply and sincerely reading and submitting to God’s commandments “just [our/my] interpretation,” as “no prophecy of scripture is of any private interpretation, for prophecy never came by the will of man, but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit” (2 Peter 1:20-21). But they are instead, the rock-steady, rock-solid result of diligent study, resulting in “rightly dividing the word of truth” (2 Timothy 2:15).

I was recently made aware of yet another list of “peripheral reasonings” seeking to somehow circumvent the commandments of the Lord regarding women’s roles in the church. I must say that they were by and large not all that much different than what have surely been encountered, biblically addressed, and put to rest many times before on this subject… but the answers remain the same, because the Scripture does not, has not, and will not change. And so, please notice that in the below examination of said list, the original points will be first quoted, with the biblical responses found in light blue shaded backgrounds for your convenience…

~~~~~~~~~~~~

(NOTE: To view this entire study, including a point by point biblical breakdown and response to the 20-plus, furnished, “scriptural proofs” supposedly supporting more female leadership in the assemblies of the Lord’s church, please see the newly-posted “Peripheral Reasonings And Women’s Roles In The Church” PDF under the “Contemporary Worship Errors Corrected” section of our “Bible Studies” tab at www.clevelandok.church, or, www.clevelandcoc.com.)

Posted in Doug Dingley | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Baptism, Women, and Peripheral Reasoning