Jesus was a Servant

Jesus was a Servant

“For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45). Perhaps the most radical part of Jesus’ identity is that He came to be a servant.  The last thing that most of us naturally want to do in our relationships is serve one another.  Instead, we seek to control.  From a young age we learn how to get what we want.  We admire those who know how to finesse people, manage circumstances, and control outcomes.  Politics is the art of controlling others.

Is your life dedicated to being a servant?

Is your life dedicated to being a servant?

Jesus’ enemies knew that He was not a politician.  The Herodians said to Jesus, “Teacher, we know that You are true, and teach the way of God in truth; nor do You care about anyone, for You do not regard the person of men” (Matthew 22:16).  Jesus wouldn’t play the political games of manipulation; He just said what needed to be said.  In so doing, He truly served their best interests because He told them what they needed to hear, not what they wanted to hear.  Are we open to hearing what we need to hear? 

Jesus said in Mark 10:42-44: “You know that those who are considered rulers over the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones exercise authority over them. Yet it shall not be so among you; but whoever desires to become great among you shall be your servant. And whoever of you desires to be first shall be slave of all.”  Human pride does not desire to serve, but to “exercise authority.”  Pride is the biggest obstacle to being a servant. Are we open to being a servant by killing our pride?God bless you and I love you.

Posted in Kevin Cauley | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Jesus was a Servant

Hearing the Light

Hearing the Light

It has often been speculated as to what the Apostle Paul’s “thorn in the flesh” might have been which caused him such difficulties (2 Cor. 12:7-8). Some believe it to have been his eyesight, injured and never to be the same after his “illuminating” incident on the road to Damascus (See: Acts 26:13; Gal. 4:13-15, 6:11 + 17). However, one has to wonder if, with the Apostle Peter, it wasn’t perhaps an acute lack of hearing which led to his having to experience some of the terrible tears and trials he did.

Do You Have Hearing Problems?

Do You Have Hearing Problems?

Do you recall the incident right after Jesus washed the apostles’ feet that final night before He was arrested and crucified? After they had sung a hymn and headed out to the Mount of Olives, Jesus informed His disciples that they would all desert Him later on that very evening. He even noted how certain this prediction was to happen by citing scripture and showing this was a prophetic fact. “It is written” He said (see Matt. 26:30-35).

But it was apparently at this point that Peter’s hearing problem kicked in (nor was this the first time we have “heard” of such – Matt. 16:21-23). Despite the fact that Jesus had told them clearly what would happen, and that it would happen both because, and just as, ‘it was written’ in the scriptures, Peter vehemently denied it. In fact, he went on to quite proudly and pridefully put himself forward, apparently thinking that he was either just a little bit better, a little bit stronger, or maybe even a little bit more faithful and devoted to Jesus than the other disciples around him were (vs. 33). Even when Jesus went on to further inform Peter both directly, personally, and specifically, regarding the exact and intimate details of how he would later deny Him (vs. 34), it appears that Peter’s ‘hearing’ problem was still preventing him from truly ‘getting it’ (vs. 35).

Have you ever wondered why Jesus – who had never lost an argument in His entire earthly life – did not go on to further explain to Peter, that which was inevitably going to happen concerning Him? I have. And I believe I know the answer. Jesus, in His godly and all-consuming wisdom, knew that as long as Peter wasn’t listening, there was no sense in His further trying to teach him anything. Perhaps stating that sentiment in our simple modern vernacular (and yes, despite the double negatives): “There ain’t no sense talking if there ain’t no one listening.” Peter was just going to have to learn the hard way. And he did. When He denied the Lord later that night just as the Word – both written and walking – had said He would, He went out and wept bitterly (See Matt. 26:69-75).

As we consider Peter’s apparent “hearing” problem, perhaps we all need to ask ourselves, “How many bitter, needless, and painful tears, trials, and corrections have I been forced to endure, which could have been totally avoided if I had just listened, accepted, and obeyed what, deep down, I knew the word of God said in the first place? And how many times will this obvious truth make itself all too apparent on that fatal and final day, when it will be too late to repent of any such stubborn and/or self-imposed deafness?”

As Jesus was so fond of saying:

He who has ears…, let him hear…”

Posted in Doug Dingley | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Hearing the Light

LA CENA DEL SEÑOR A LOS ENFERMOS

LA CENA DEL SEÑOR A LOS ENFERMOS 

Es domingo por la tarde, y un grupo de hermanos se dirigen a casa de la hermana Juana para participar a ella de la cena del Señor. La hermana tenía una cita con el médico el domingo por la mañana y por esa razón no pudo asistir al servicio de la la Iglesia. Los hermanos llegan hasta su hogar y después de preguntar como está, se lee una porción de las sagradas escrituras y luego se procede a darle el pan después de haber dado y gracias y por ultimo el jugo. Se hace una oración y luego la hermana les comparte una tacita de café para continuar disfrutando de un rato ameno. Muy respetado lector, el caso hipotético anterior es sin duda el escenario que han vivido y continúan viviendo muchas congregaciones de la Iglesia de Cristo al rededor del mundo. Con muchísima más frecuencia he podido observar esto en Latinoamérica.

¿Donde lo autoriza Dios?.

¿Donde lo autoriza Dios?.

A menudo se pregunta ¿pero que hay de malo con eso?. En estos casos cuando esa pregunta es hecha es muy probable que haya razones predeterminadas detrás de la misma por lo que no es muy sabio contestar con la misma fluidez de la pregunta. Más bien la pregunta correcta es: ¿Donde autoriza la Biblia tal cosa?. La enorme diferencia entre la Iglesia verdadera del Señor y las denominaciones es que, respetamos la autoridad bíblica con libro, capítulo y versículo para todo lo que hacemos y así debe de ser (Col.3:17). Por lo tanto hacemos valer este texto con la pregunta ¿Donde lo autoriza Dios?. Usted sabe mejor que yo que Dios habla de 4 maneras en su palabra:

  1. Mandamiento Directo. Es lo que Dios explícitamente ha dicho. Ejemplo; Mr.16:16.
  2. Ejemplo Aprobado. Son ejemplos que encontramos en el N.T de algún apóstol o persona que es agradable a Dios y que está procediendo en armonía con el resto de la Biblia. Ejemplo La Cena del Señor cada domingo (Hec.20:7).
  3. Inferencia Necesaria.  Llegar a una conclusión explicita cuando se está implicando algo. Algunos usan inferencia necesaria para todo especialmente para justiciar sus maneras de creer o en ocaciones sus prácticas. Se infiere únicamente cuando el texto implica. Ejemplo No hay pasaje que diga que Pablo confesó a Cristo. Hechos 22:16 implica esto.
  4. El Silencio:  Es cuando no hay instrucción de ninguna de las 3 maneras anteriores.Estas 4 cosas son absolutamente autoritarias, todas, ninguna menor a la otra.

Cuando pasamos el tema que nos compete por este filtro (la hermenéutica bíblica) observaremos juntos que la práctica de llevar la cena a los enfermos, aunque es noble, no tiene arraigo bíblico. ¿Donde nació entonces esta práctica?, yo se que a lo mejor muchos se van a sentir ofendidos por la respuesta pero permítame aclarar, que no deseamos ofender ni dudar de las buenas intenciones de hermanos que lo hacen y lo han hecho por años para ayudar, sabemos eso y adulamos el buen deseo de tales hermanos, pero siendo realmente honestos con nosotros mismos, esta práctica nace en el corazón del hombre, si, es cierto que es para bien, pero se origina en el corazón del hombre.

Algunos por su parte aluden a que esto no es un asunto de salvación ni tampoco que afecta a la doctrina, a lo que con respeto rogamos por favor vuelva a considerar. Quién escribe está, plenamente convencido que es un asunto relevante (de otra manera no escribiríamos sobre esto) y que tiene que ver con el corazón  de la doctrina misma, la adoración en espíritu y en verdad (Jn.4:23-24). Aquí están algunas de las razones del porque esta práctica se convierte en un asunto tan delicado.

  1. Los actos de adoración: Por alguna razón desconocida (Sarcasmo), hay hermanos que con convicción firme aluden (y muchas veces al frente de la congregación) que el acto de adoración más importante es la Cena del Señor. El texto en Hechos 20:7 dice que los discípulos estaban reunidos para partir el pan, sin embargo no se debe de entender que esa era la única razón por la que los discípulos estaban reunidos o que haya sido esa la razón principal. El mismo versículo (muchísimas veces ignorado) continúa diciendo: “Pablo les enseñaba, habiendo de salir al día siguiente; y alargó el discurso hasta la medianoche”. Gramaticalmente hablando puedo correctamente afirmar que la razón principal por la que los discípulos estaban ahí era para ser enseñados por Pablo, de hecho era tan importante que alargó su discurso, sin embargo sabemos que este no es el caso, estamos convencidos que los discípulos no se reunían solamente para llevar a cabo 2 actos de adoración. Cuando a este versículo le agregamos Hechos 2: 42; Y perseveraban en la doctrina de los apóstoles, en la comunión unos con otros, en el partimiento del pan y en las oraciones”, entendemos que la doctrina de los apóstoles abarca los 5 actos de adoración. Cuando llevamos la cena a un enfermo de la congregación, ¿donde quedan los demás 4 actos de adoración? bueno simplemente no se llevan a cabo porque somos de la idea que no son importante o lo creemos por implicación.  Tremendo error¡ Tenga cuidado con eso!.
  2. Lo que Dios espera: En la adoración nosotros rendimos adoración a Dios, pero en su diseño único y especial El espera que los actos de adoración también de una otra manera nos involucre a todos. Observe Ef. 5:19 “cantando entre vosotros.., exhortando unos a otros…”, Dios espera una adoración colectiva como su cuerpo, la Iglesia. Como ejemplo aprobado observamos esto en Hechos 2:42 “en la comunión unos con otros, en el partimiento del pan…” Nunca usted encontrará en las páginas del N.T a dos o tres individuos reuniéndose a parte (de una manera separa de la Iglesia). Siempre vemos que ellos estaban juntos (Hechos 2:44) Esto es lo que Dios espera, el comer de un pan y tomar jugo de uva no es lo importante aquí, sino más bien lo que esto significa para nosotros, el hacer memoria juntos como Iglesia que es a travez de El y su sacrificio que hemos “todos”(miembros del cuerpo de Cristo) sido comprados del pecado y rescatados de la condenación. Dios no espera amigo mío a tres cristianos haciendo esto, Dios espera vernos como la Iglesia del siglo primero, juntos como el grupo de los santos redimidos (Ap.7:9; 19:1). El Señor Jesús oró para que fuéramos uno (Juan 17: 21-23), nosotros pues deberíamos de procurar esta unidad siempre en todo sentido.
  3. A la inversa: No estamos dejando que sea el hombre el que se ajuste a los parámetros de Dios, sino más bien estamos ajustando los parámetros de Dios al hombre.  Sé que la gran mayoría de hermanos realmente están enfermos o incapacitados para asistir al servicio pero también sé que muchas veces un dolor de uñas es causa suficiente para no asistir al servicio .Al final, dicen muchos ¡Los hermanos van a traerme la cena hasta aquí!. Invertir el patrón de Dios nunca ha dado buenos resultados, sino  pregunte al pueblo de Israel en el A.T como les fue con eso.

Pueden haber muchas más razones y que de hecho las hay, aunque la razón más fuerte y más sencilla para no dar lugar a esta práctica es simplemente por el Silencio de las escrituras. Dios no dijo nada al respecto, Dios por lo tanto no lo autoriza. ¿No cree usted amigo, que Dios no pensó en todo? ¿No cree usted, que si fuera algo trascendentalmente necesario, Dios lo hubiera expresado? . Por años muy correctamente la Iglesia de Cristo ha interpretado el silencio de Dios con los instrumentos musicales, y de que no hay autorización para los mismos, ¿porqué, entonces hay tantos hermanos que tienen tanta dificultad para de la misma manera entender este asunto?. Dios conoce y es El quién pesa los corazones (Pr.21:2). Este antiguo pasaje de Proverbios continúa siendo verdad en nuestra era. Si realmente usted no pude asistir al servicio de la Iglesia por motivos de fuerza mayor, El sabe y entiende eso. Dios no le va a enviar a condenación por no tomar la cena ese domingo (que irónicamente algunos piensan así) sino que su corazón puede estar tranquilo, si usted está consiente de sus motivaciones. Los hermanos de la Iglesia por otra parte podemos ir a visitarle; a mostrar que nos importa, que usted es parte de nosotros (Ro.12:5), que toda la Iglesia está pensando en usted (1Co.12:26) y que al final de nuestro servicio oramos por usted  (St.5:16). ¡Esto si que será de gran ánimo para cualquier enfermo!.

 

Posted in Heiner Montealto | Tagged , , | Comments Off on LA CENA DEL SEÑOR A LOS ENFERMOS

Jesus Learned Obedience, Have your Children?

Jesus Learned Obedience, Have your Children?

One of the great joys of Bible study is finding words and phrases which have great truths but which can so easily be overlooked. Read the following verse, and see if you may have overlooked one of the “hidden” truths. “Though He was a Son, yet He learned obedience by the things which He suffered. And having been perfected, He became the author of eternal salvation to all who obey Him” (Heb. 5:8-9). He learned obedience! Obedience is not something which happens accidently, it must be learned.

Obedience to God demonstrates we are doing the right thing.

Obedience to God demonstrates we are doing the right thing.

There is no doubt that Jesus came into the world to do the will of God (Heb. 10:7). Because our High Priest was tempted in every way in which we are, He had to learn that which we learn—He had to learn to obey.

When He taught His disciples how to pray, He included the petition, “Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven.” He explained to His followers why He behaved the way He did by saying, “I always do those things which please Him” (John 8:29). Facing the horrendous agony of Gethsemane and Golgotha, He prayed, “Nevertheless, not My will, but Yours be done” (Luke 22:42). His great commission showed the importance of His followers learning to obey. “Make disciples…teaching them to observe all things” (Matt. 28:19-20).

One mistake I see so many young parents make is failing to teach them obedience. That obedience is important is seen in the prominence given to it in the Ten Commandments. “Honor your father and your mother as the Lord has commanded you….that it may be well with you” (Deut. 5:16). This command is placed above those about murder and adultery. Yet, far too many young parents do not see this. Honoring and obeying parents will not happen naturally, it must be learned.

The modern philosophy about dealing with children is distraction. When a child is told to do something, and he shows displeasure, parents are being taught to distract them or bribe them in some fashion. What happens at that time is the children may be distracted and conflict is avoided, but that child did not learn obedience.

This lesson about obedience is learned best when the child is very young. In the first year of a child’s life, he can learn the meaning of the word “No.” He must learn this, for the world does not revolve around the child; he will not always get his way. That lesson must be learned early and repeatedly emphasized as the child grows. He will learn parents’ rules (and God’s) must be obeyed. Wait until he is a teen to teach this, and he will likely be unmanageable.

Jesus learned obedience. Parents, set guidelines and use the conflict to teach them what Jesus had to learn!

Posted in Dan Jenkins | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Jesus Learned Obedience, Have your Children?

Manna That Didn’t See Corruption

Manna That Didn’t See Corruption

When Moses led the congregation of Israel out of Egypt, across the Red Sea, and into the Sinai Peninsula, God fed His people with Manna. (cf. Exodus 16)

The word “manna,” means, “what is it,” which was the question the people first asked when they saw the substance lying on the ground in the morning. Manna was a round, white substance, like a coriander seed, yet with a taste like wafers made with honey (cf. Exodus 16:31). It could be boiled or baked, and it fed the Israelites for forty years in the wilderness (cf. Exodus 16:23, 35)

God has given the bread of life to His people.

God has given the bread of life to His people.

Manna was, unequivocally, a supernatural substance, and is sometimes referred to as “the bread from heaven.”  (eg. Exodus 16:4; Psalm 78:24, 105:40) It appeared with the dew in the morning and then evaporated from the ground with the sun when not gathered. Moreover, it operated a little differently depending on the day of the week. From Sunday to Friday, any manna not eaten during the day began to rot overnight and go bad. (cf. Exodus 16:17-21). But on Friday night, and all-day Saturday, it didn’t do this. Manna prepared for consumption on Friday would last through till the end of Saturday.

Part of the reason for this was practical and instructive for God’s people. He wanted them to learn to take no more than they needed, from day to day, relying completely on Him each day. Yet He had also commanded them not to work on the Sabbath, or Saturday, which included as part of the command, no cooking. The manna thus operated in a way that allowed the people to keep God’s command.

But there was, perhaps, another reason God had for the manna that didn’t see corruption: it was a foreshadowing of the death and burial of His Son.

Time and space preclude a full discussion of the symbolic importance of manna in relationship to Jesus Christ, but let us touch on one such connection between manna and the death, burial and resurrection of Christ, and having made the connection, let us also make a quick application.

While some might think such a relationship is a stretch, it was Jesus Himself who pointed His followers to consider Him in relationship to the manna with which God fed the Israelites. In the Gospel of John, Jesus is recorded as having preached an entire sermon devoted to the subject that He Himself was the true bread of heaven.

After Jesus miraculously supplied some 5000 individuals with food, the crowds came to Him again, demanding to be fed. They reminded Him that Moses had been marked by giving bread to the people of God, to which Jesus replied, “Most assuredly, I say to you, Moses did not give you the bread from heaven, but My Father gives you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is He who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.” (John 6:32-33)

He also spoke to them saying, “I am the bread of life. Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and are dead.  This is the bread which comes down from heaven, that one may eat of it and not die.” (John 6:48-50; NKJV)

Thus we see this connection made, symbolically, by Christ, between Himself and manna. So, to our point, how does this all relate to the death, burial and resurrection of Christ?

Jesus died on Passover, and was buried that evening, during the period of time we would call Friday night. His labors were over and He rested on the Sabbath in the tomb, awaiting the triumph of Sunday morning, when He would rise again.

Of this time, David, who was a prophet of God wrote of Jesus, saying, “For you will not abandon my soul to Sheol, or let your holy one see corruption.” (Psalm 16:10; ESV) Jesus was in the tomb, by modern reckoning for somewhere between 24 and 36 hours. While there is some small internal decay of a body immediately following death, bacteria, we are told, does not begin to truly work on the body until after two or three days have passed. Jesus was not dead long enough for this process to truly get underway.

So here we have this connection. Jesus was the true Bread of Heaven, sent from God to give life and sustenance to God’s people. In the wilderness, come Sabbath, manna, the bread of heaven which foreshadowed Christ, did not see decay, and when Jesus was in the tomb on Saturday, He likewise did not see decay.

Some might think this to be a trivial sort of point, but as we contemplate it, we must be moved by the incredible forethought that God put into His plan, foreshadowing it every step of the way, so that the whole of the Old Testament speaks to us today, pointing us over and over to the work of Christ, as was written, “now all these things happened to them as examples, and they were written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages have come.” (1 Corinthians 10:11; NKJV)

What is our conclusion then? Let us hear what Jesus said in this matter: “Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give to you. For on him God the Father has set His seal.” (John 6:27; ESV)

God signified the identity of Jesus with a multitude of evidences. He is the Christ we are wise to hearken to, working to gain the resurrection that He has promised us.

 

Posted in Jonathan McAnulty | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Manna That Didn’t See Corruption