ENTRE DOS TESTAMENTOS

ENTRE DOS TESTAMENTOS 

¿Alguna vez te has preguntado qué sucedió entre el Antiguo y el Nuevo Testamento? El Libro de Malaquías cerró el canon del Antiguo Testamento alrededor del 397 aC. Los siguientes cuatro siglos hasta el nacimiento de Cristo han sido referidos como “cuatrocientos años de silencio”, pero en una inspección más cercana, encontramos que Dios había estado trabajando a lo largo de este período para preparar el escenario para el Mesías venidero. Fue una culminación de la historia que Pablo llamó “el cumplimiento de los tiempos” (Gálatas 4: 4, Efesios 1:10). Para apreciar completamente los tiempos en que vivió Jesús, debemos considerar los eventos que produjeron esos tiempos. Desde el punto de vista de la historia judía, este período entre el Antiguo y el Nuevo Testamento es llamado el período intertestamental. Es interesante notar más cuidadosamente el capítulo 2 de Daniel. Aquí en esta imagen que Dios muestra a Nabuconodosor y que Daniel interpreta se nos presentan estos 4 reinos; Babilonia, Medo-Persa, Grecia y el Imperio Romano. La profecía decía que en los días de estos reyes, el Dios del cielo levantará un reino que no será jamás destruido (Daniel 2:44). Lo que sucedió entonces con estos 4 imperios fue de vital importancia para preparar el escenario del Mesías y nos él sino también de la Iglesia misma y que esta pudiera establecerse y funcionar en acuerdo con las profecías.

Dios nunca ha estado inactivo y no lo estará aunque eso sea lo que parezca para muchos.

Dios nunca ha estado inactivo y no lo estará aunque eso sea lo que parezca para muchos.

En los años 397–336 a.C los persas habían dominado el Medio Oriente desde el 536 aC (Esdras 1: 8).  Todo los eventos en estos años contribuyeron para el ministerio del Señor y que  sus apóstoles llegase a tener éxito.

  • Los judíos fueron dejados en relativa paz para reconstruir su sociedad después del exilio babilónico.
  • La sinagoga se convirtió en una gran influencia (culto local, política, educación). Los escribas se hicieron influyentes en la interpretación de las Escrituras (Lucas 20:39). Se construyó un templo en Samaria, que rivaliza con el culto en el templo de Esdras en Jerusalén. Este desarrollo tendría efectos de largo alcance en las relaciones entre judíos y samaritanos (Juan 4: 9).
  • Los judíos continuaron viviendo fuera de Canaán (Jeremías 9:16, 52: 28-30).
  • En la era Griega (336–323 aC) – Los ejércitos de Alejandro Magno de Grecia tomaron el control del Medio Oriente hasta la India occidental. Toda la región se vio fuertemente influenciada por la cultura y el idioma griegos en un proceso llamado Helenización. Muchos judíos resistieron fuertemente la influencia griega. Sin embargo esto fue de trascendental relevancia después, porque el Griego fue aceptado, hablado y escrito por la gente, se volvió el idioma popular. ¿Si ha usted le hubiera tocado decir en que Idioma Dios dejaría en registro la gran mayoría de lo trascendental, que idioma escogería usted? Dios escogió el idioma griego y no solo lo eligió sino que preparó todo el camino con gente pagana  incluso para llevar a cabo su plan. ¿No es esto maravilloso?
  • En la era Egipcia (323–198 aC) – Después de la muerte de Alejandro en 323 aC, cuatro generales dividieron el Imperio griego en cuatro segmentos. Ptolomeo tomó el control de Egipto y pronto dominó toda la región incluso cerca de Israel. Muchos judíos fueron “reasentados’’en Alejandría y gradualmente adoptaron la cultura helenística. Se autorizó una traducción griega del Antiguo Testamento, que produjo la Septuaginta (Hechos 18:24). El énfasis griego en la estética afectó el culto hebreo, tendiendo a hacerlo más externo que interno. Los judíos en Israel se polarizaron a lo largo de líneas políticas, culturales y religiosas, liderados por dos grupos emergentes: los helenistas (Hechos 6: 9) y los Hasidim (o “Piadosos”), los precursores de los fariseos (Mateo 16: 1).
  • La era Siria (198–165 aC) – Los sirios derrotaron a los egipcios en la batalla de Panion (198 aC). Los conflictos entre los helenistas y los hasidim trajeron a Antioco Epifanes a Jerusalén en el 168 a. C. para resolver la disputa. Este Trató de eliminar todos los distintivos de la fe hebrea prohibiendo los sacrificios al Señor, prohibiendo la circuncisión, cancelando el Sábado y los días de fiesta, destruyendo copias de las Escrituras, obligando a los judíos a comer carne de cerdo y estableciendo la adoración de ídolos como el dios Zeus en el templo. . La oposición de los judíos llevó a muchas muertes. Surgió un grupo de hombres leales al sumo sacerdote, que más tarde se convertiría en el partido de los saduceos (Mateo 16: 1)
  • La era Macabea (165–63 aC) – Miles de judíos se unieron detrás de un anciano sacerdote llamado Matatías, de la familia de Hasmon, quien se sublevó contra la idolatría siria en su ciudad natal de Modein, al noroeste de Jerusalén. Los tres hijos de Matatías, Judas Maccabaeus, Jonatán y Simón recobraron Jerusalén, limpiaron el templo y restauraron la adoración. Hacia el 142 aC, Israel finalmente logró la independencia, que duró setenta años bajo el liderazgo de los hasmoneos. Un gobernador y sumo sacerdote, Juan Hyrcanus, destruyó el templo samaritano. Comenzó a referirse a sí mismo como rey y fue apoyado por los saduceos. Sin embargo, se opuso a los fariseos y sus seguidores, que reconocieron a los reyes solo a través de la línea de David.
  • La era Romana (63–4 aC): Pompeyo de Roma invadió Siria y entró en Israel. La resistencia en Jerusalén llevó a la captura de la ciudad por la fuerza y ​​la ocupación romana. Julio César nombró a Antípas, como procurador de Judea en el año 47 aC. Más tarde, el hijo de Antípas, Herodes, llegó al poder (Hechos 12: 1-2) y fue el rey en el momento del nacimiento de Jesús (Mateo 2: 1). Herodes comenzó la construcción de un nuevo templo. Él era un helenista devoto y mató a todos los descendientes de los hasmoneos. Surgió un partido político conocido como los herodianos (Mateo 16: 1), dedicado a los Herodes y al helenismo, y se opuso a los judíos tradicionales por temor a que incitaran a las tropas romanas a regresar a destruir Jerusalén. También se desarrolló un partido de la oposición, los zelotes (Mateo 16: 1), que se negó a someterse a la autoridad de Roma y defendió la rebelión armada. Con todo la era Romana trazo con la famosa “Pax Romana”, o paz Romana que logró por casi 200 años mantener el orden y la paz. Esto fue de tremenda importancia, ya que de no haber sido por esta paz Romana, el Señor Jesús hubiese sido sacado fuera de la ciudad y probablemente se le hubiera dado muerte fracasando en la Misión eterna. Dios en este Periodo intertestamental preparó muy bien cada detalle. Jesús y sus discípulos pudieron transitar libremente por las calles predicando sabiendo que gozaban en cierta manera de protección, de buenos caminos amplios y espaciosos y de cierta libertad que estaba ahí por causa de los Romanos.

Periodo Intertestamental fue de gran importancia para el plan de salvación que Dios había venido trabajando desde Adán. Galátas 4:4 es quizás el pasaje que abarca mucho más tiempo que cualquier otro texto en la Biblia “Cuando llegó el cumplimiento de los tiempos”.  Definitivamente solo quedamos con la boca abierta de ver a Dios trabajando en su providencia para su plan que tendría su punto más alto la venida del Mesías y en ultima  instancia el establecimiento de su Iglesia. Sin duda alguna ya han pasado poco más de 2000 años en los que no a habido revelación nueva pero sin lugar a dudas Dios sigue trabajando providencialmente en nuestro mundo.  Al igual que el periodo entre los 2 testamentos Dios nunca ha estado inactivo y no lo estará aunque eso sea lo que parezca para muchos. Los cristianos esperamos su venida y trabajaremos con su ayuda y providencia hasta ese ultimo día (1Tes.5:1)

 

Posted in Heiner Montealto | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on ENTRE DOS TESTAMENTOS

Dinosaurs! Evolution’s Back Door into Your Home

Evolution’s Back Door into Your Home

At 3:00 p.m., mom stops folding laundry and begins contemplating what to fix for dinner. Suddenly, she hears the unmistakable sound of little feet running down the sidewalk. Within seconds, the front door bangs open and little Johnny comes running down the hallway into a brightly lit kitchen.

They are real!  But there backstory is often fictitious.

They are real! But there backstory is often fictitious.

As mom frantically tries to keep the mud tracks off the floor, little Johnny circles round and round, shouting: “Guess what video we watched today at school!” With a dustpan in one hand, and an old wooden broom in the other, mom looks up and replies, “What Johnny?” Johnny lets out an ear-piercing scream and yells, “Dinosaurs!” And without taking another breath he begins rattling off the names of dinosaurs: “We saw a Brachiosaurus, Apatosaurus, Deinonychus, Triceratops, Stegosaurus, Spinosaurus, Tyrannosaurus rex, and a Velociraptor! Oh, mom you should have seen them. They were so cool. I want to get some books about them. Can we please? Can we mom?”

And so, without any advance notice, Mom is thrown into the realm of the dinosaurs. Only minutes ago she was folding laundry, wishing she were elsewhere. Now she would be content to wind back the hands of time and fold those clothes. No one warned her that motherhood included needing advanced degrees in dinosaur trivia.

For the next several days, the questions continue. “When were the dinosaurs around? Why did they become extinct? Were they cold-blooded or warm-blooded?” Poor mom—she can cook dinner, wash clothes, clean the kitchen, watch the children, and talk on the phone all at the same time…but dinosaurs? All mom knows about dinosaurs can be summed up like this: They were big, and they were green. Aside from that, mom has to rely on books to provide Little Johnny with the answers that he so desperately seeks.

Within a week, their house has been turned into a virtual dinosaur hall of fame. Dinosaur books, puzzles, games, and action figures can be found in just about every room. Every dime Little Johnny had saved up has been spent on dinosaur books. You know the ones—the books with big colorful pictures on slick glossy paper. The same ones that usually somewhere around page one, paragraph one, say something like, “All life on our planet changes and develops over many millions of years. This is called evolution. Millions of years ago the dinosaurs roamed the Earth, long before man ever existed.”

Even those “harmless” sticker books that she bought Little Johnny mention that dinosaurs roamed the Earth 225 million years ago. And so, within just a few weeks Little Johnny has filled his brain with dinosaur trivia; but he has also laid down the planks on which the evolutionary theory will one day be built in his belief system.

In most homes, children are being indoctrinated with evolution and atheism long before parents are even aware a battle is going on for the soul of their children. Parents, it matters what your children are putting into their minds. Please invest the time and energy into making sure what they are studying and embracing harmonizes with God’s Word. Yes dinosaurs are amazing creatures! Just make sure you share with your children how those amazing creatures fit into God’s incredible creation!!


Check out our store for material on dinosaurs!

Posted in Brad Harrub | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Dinosaurs! Evolution’s Back Door into Your Home

To Whose Voice Are We Listening?

To Whose Voice Are We Listening?

We all listen to the voice of someone.  We come into this world listening to the voice of our mother and father.  In adulthood the cacophony of voices that bend our ear can be staggering.  Luke wrote, “For all the Athenians and strangers which were there spent their time in nothing else, but either to tell, or to hear some new thing” (Acts 17:21).  This describes our society too!

The voices we listen to affect our decisions.

The voices we listen to affect our decisions.

The voices to which we listen affect the decisions that we make and the actions that we take.  What we believe will affect how we act.  Jesus said, “A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things” (Matthew 12:35).  We don’t act in any way without first having thought about it, and there are only two voices in this world that truly speak: the voice of God and the voice of Satan, the voice of truth and the voice of error, the voice of righteousness and the voice of sin (Matthew 21:25).  We should choose the voice of God, truth, and righteousness.

We hear God’s voice through the revelation of God’s mind by His Spirit sent by His Son, Jesus.  Scripture says that no man knows the mind of God except the Spirit of God reveal it to him (1 Corinthians 2:11).  It also says, no man has seen God; it is only the Son of God who has declared Him (John 1:18).  The only way to know God’s mind is if God reveals His mind through inspiration (1 Corinthians 2:12).  And there is only one inspired source of truth from the mind of God, the Bible, the story of Jesus.  May we hear the voice of Jesus!  God bless you, and I love you.

Posted in Kevin Cauley | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on To Whose Voice Are We Listening?

Acts 6 and the Gift of the Holy Spirit (Part 2)

Acts 6 and the Gift of the Holy Spirit (Part 2)

This article is a continuation of an examination Acts 6 and it’s role in identifying the gift of the Holy Spirit. (http://churchofchristarticles.com/blog/administrator/acts-63-6-and-the-gift-of-the-holy-spirit-part-1/) It is passage often used to eliminate any prophetic component to the gift of the Spirit. In part one we discussed the significance of the apostles’ laying hands on the seven chosen men. It is recommended you read that article in conjunction with the thoughts of this one.

This article will note four additional issues facing the proponents of a non-prophetic gift of the Spirit as they commonly use this passage.

The Seven Men were not just Full of the Spirit, but also Full of Wisdom, Faith, Grace and Power

The problems facing the common use of this passage go beyond just the uncertain arguments relating to the laying on hands. The issues become greater when one considers that in verses 3-4 the seven men, and Stephen in particular, are said to be not only full of the Spirit, but also of wisdom and faith. It is interesting to note that two of the gifts listed in 1 Corinthians 12:9-11 are wisdom and faith.

Full of the Spirit.

Full of the Spirit.

In Old Testament prophecy being full of the Spirit is tied to the infilling of wisdom. In Isaiah 11:2 the Bible says:

“And the Spirit of the LORD shall rest upon him, the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of the LORD.”

The Spirit is labeled as the giver of wisdom, counsel, might, and knowledge. In earlier articles, we have already seen that same language attached to being full of the Spirit in Exodus. There Bezalel and Oholiab were said to have been filled with “skill, ability, knowledge, intelligence, and craftsmanship” (Exodus 31:3).

Further in Acts 6:8, Stephen is described as a man full of grace and power. The connection to Micah 3:8 cannot be missed: “I am filled with power, with the Spirit of the Lord.”

  1. According to Micah, to be filled with power is to be filled with the Spirit
  2. Stephen was full of the Spirit in Acts 6:3
  3. Therefore, based on Micah 3:8, Stephen was full of power in Acts 6:3
  4. It was that power that led to his preaching and working of signs in Acts 6:8

The conclusion that must be drawn from that connection is that one who is full of power, grace, wisdom, and faith has access to the Spirit’s prophetic abilities because he is one who is full of the Spirit.

Stephen’s being Full of the Spirit in Acts 7 is Clearly Prophetic

A simply stated problem arises when Acts 7:55 is considered. There is no doubt that Acts 7:55 follows the pattern we have seen in every other reference of the infilling of the Spirit: “But he, full of the Holy Spirit, gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God.” The “he” of Acts 7:55 is Stephen. He is said to be “full of the Holy Spirit” which enables him to have a vision of the throne of God. Clearly, we once again have a connection between prophetic insight and being full of the Spirit. If Stephen’s being full of the Spirit in Acts 7:55 is a statement of prophetic ability, why does the exact same language about the same individual not have the same meaning? If it is simply because Acts 6:6 says the apostles’ laid hands on him, a stronger answer is needed (as we have shown).

Stephen’s Preaching was Directed by the “Wisdom” and “Spirit” of which he was Full

In case there was any remaining doubt about the nature of the Spirit and wisdom needed in Stephen and the other six men, look at Acts 6:10: “But they could not withstand the wisdom and the Spirit with which he was speaking.” All parties admit that by verse 10, Stephen is an inspired preacher. The Bible states that his preaching came through the “wisdom” and “Spirit” he possessed.

It is a strained reading of Acts 6, at best, which makes his being “full of the Spirit and wisdom” in verse 3 have no connection to the wisdom and Spirit he possesses in verse 10.

Acts 6:3 only States the Fact of Indwelling, not its Function

At least one final problem remains for those who would dispute that the seven men to be chosen were prophetically gifted is that Acts 6:3 states a simple fact: The men must be full of the Holy Spirit. It does not state in any way the function of the infilling. In that regard it is unique from the verses that precede it and most of those that follow it. So far, every statement of a filling by God’s Spirit has been followed immediately with a prophetic role or statement of inspired action. Each verse has stated both the fact that a man was filled by the Spirit and the function that filling provided him. The problem with asserting that Acts 6:3 cannot include the miracles of the Spirit is that the Bible has provided no other meaning to the phrase. If “full of the Spirit” in Acts 6:3 does not mean prophetic powers, what does it mean? Which verse prior to Acts 6:3 introduces a non-prophetic filling into the doctrinal tapestry of the Bible?

Assuming that a non-prophetic infilling exists is not good enough. As the apostles do not explain to the church what it means to be “full of the Spirit,” the church must have already known what it meant. The truth is they did. They had seen it in the events of Acts 2:4 and Acts 4:8 and Acts 4:31. There was already an established meaning to the phrase. There was no other option on the table. If Acts 6:3 does not refer to a prophetic filling, there is no other understanding the church at Jerusalem could have known.

Those who hold that “full of the Spirit” in Acts 6:3 means an ordinary (non-miraculous/non-prophetic) work of the Holy Spirit for all Christians must find, prior to Acts 6:3, book, chapter, and verse proof that such a work has been described in scripture. Their task is to do more than to exclude the prophetic from Acts 6:3 – although they must do that. They must also prove that the position that being “filled with the Holy Spirit” is a non-prophetic function in scripture.Acts 6:3 simply does not state, by itself, what the function of the infilling of the Holy Spirit did for those seven men.

It should also be noted that being full of the Spirit was a needed qualification for a special function in the church at Jerusalem. If being “full of the Spirit” is the result of every Christian’s having received “the gift of the Spirit,” then what quality beyond simply being a Christian are the apostles instructing the church to find in those seven men? Their “good repute” is something that the Jerusalem church could identify and measure. Their “wisdom” is something that the church could witness, and again, measure. What evidence exists to measure the impact of one’s being “full of the Spirit” that is in no way prophetic in its influence? If all Christians are “full of the Spirit” at baptism, but the demonstration of the infilling is not the same in all people, the effect of the Spirit’s work must be demonstrable in some way. Further, as the non-prophetic indwelling view separates the effect of the Spirit’s indwelling from the effect of His influence only through the word, one’s being “full of the Spirit” is not simply a statement of the word’s influence on a man. This would necessitate that one’s being “full of the Spirit” has a demonstrable effect (which the Jerusalem saints could have used to identify qualified men) in the life of a Christian. For the non-prophetic indwelling proponent, few options short of the Calvinist’s direct influence exist that can be used to characterize the demonstrable, non-prophetic, non-“word only” influence of the infilling of the Holy Spirit

In summary, once one realizes that more than one reason exists for the apostles to lay hands on individuals the difficulties of this text evaporate. The language of verse 6 is the only perceived difficulty which would prevent one from understanding how the men of Acts 6:3 were full of the Spirit. The phrase in 6:3 means the same as it does in Acts 7:55 and every other passage noted so far.

Posted in Jonathan Jenkins | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Acts 6 and the Gift of the Holy Spirit (Part 2)

Acts 6:3-6 and the Gift of the Holy Spirit – Part 1


Acts 6:3-6 and the Gift of the Holy Spirit – Part 1

Acts 6 is another important passage in one’s understanding of the work of the Holy Spirit in the church. As noted in the comments of articles on Acts 5:12 and 5:32, the argument for the non-prophetic indwelling of the Holy Spirit in the church makes an important use of the events of Acts 6.

Laying on of the hands.

Laying on of the hands.

Most in the church agree that the Bible teaches it was only through the laying on of an apostle’s hands that the prophetic powers of the Holy Spirit were passed on to first-century Christians.  That truth being established, it is in verse 3 that an apparent difficulty arises. Acts 6:3 lists being full of the Holy Spirit as one of the qualifications of the seven men that the Jerusalem church was to identify. However, those men are not said to have the apostles lay their hands on them until Acts 6:6: “These they set before the apostles, and they prayed and laid their hands on them.”

  1. If it is the case that only by the laying on of an apostle’s hands a man could receive the powers of the Holy Spirit (And we believe that to be the case).
  2. If it is also the case that being full of the Spirit implies prophetic abilities (And we have established in other articles that to be the case in every verse prior to Acts 6).
  3. How is it possible that these seven men were full of the Spirit before the apostles laid their hands on them?

The question is valid and at first glance makes a compelling case for re-evaluating our understanding of one’s being “full of the Holy Spirit.” If it is possible to be “full of the Spirit” with no connection to the apostolic ministry, then the Holy Spirit must have some work in the lives of the saints beyond the prophetic.

However, there are several points that must be considered before admitting to that conclusion. This article will examine the first of those points.

The Laying on of Hands has More Than One Purpose in the Bible

At the heart of the objection to a prophetically empowered gift of the Holy Spirit made from this passage is the belief that Acts 6:6 means that the apostles would grant prophetic powers to these seven men to fill the role of attending to the widows. As a part of their initiation as servants of the church, the seven men would become the first people beyond the apostles with prophetic abilities.

However, that argument is sound only if it can be established that there was only one reason that the apostles would lay hands on the seven. The truth of the matter is that the laying on of hands was a well-established practice among the ancients. Its presence is found several times in the Bible. Further, it had an established significance completely unrelated to the giving of the Holy Spirit.

Timothy provides an interesting case study. He was an inspired preacher of the early church. The Bible clearly states that he received that prophetic ability through the laying on of the apostle Paul’s hands:

“For this reason I remind you to fan into flame the gift of God, which is in you through the laying on of my hands, for God gave us a spirit not of fear but of power and love and self-control” (2 Timothy 1:6-7).

Yet, there is another statement of Timothy’s having hands laid on him:

“Do not neglect the gift you have, which was given you by prophecy when the council of elders laid their hands on you” (1 Timothy 4:14).

These verses describe both the manner (“through the laying on my hands”) and the time (“when the council of elders laid their hands on you”) of Timothy’s receiving the prophetic endowment of the Holy Spirit. While the specific details of the ceremony mentioned are not described we do know that two groups of people laid their hands upon Timothy. We know that Paul did so to empower him with the “gift of God.” The purpose of the elders’ touch on Timothy was for a purpose beyond that of granting the Spirit’s power to Timothy. It was likely as sign of commission or endorsement of his work (Compare also Genesis 48:14, 17; Numbers 27:23; Mark 10:16; Acts 13:3; 1 Timothy 5:22).

For what purpose then did the apostles lay hands on the men in Acts 6? Read their own words:

“Therefore, brothers, pick out from among you seven men of good repute, full of the Spirit and of wisdom, whom we will appoint to this duty” (Acts 6:3).

Question: “When did the apostles appoint them to the duty and what was the indication that they had done so?

The answer is clear. Verse 6 is the time and manner in which the apostles appointed those seven men to the duty.

This ceremony stands in sharp contrast to the two mentioned examples of the apostles’ laying on of hands to deliver the Spirit’s power to Christians. Notice all three passages in succession:

  1. These they set before the apostles, and they prayed and laid their hands on them. (Acts 6:6)
  2. Then they laid their hands on them and they received the Holy Spirit. (Acts 8:17)
  3. And when Paul had laid his hands on them, the Holy Spirit came on them, and they began speaking in tongues and prophesying. (Acts 19:6)

Do you notice what is missing from Acts 6:6? Why is no statement found in Acts 6:6 that the seven received the Holy Spirit and began to speak in tongues or an indication that others could see the Spirit’s power in them as Simon could in Acts 8:18?

The answer is simple: Because verse 3 already told us those seven had the Holy Spirit.

What we have then is a phrase – “full of the Spirit”— which has but one meaning in the Bible and a phrase – “laying on of hands” – which has multiple meanings. We have evidence that the second phrase has a particular usage when connected to the Holy Spirit (cp. Acts 8:17; Acts 19:6) and the evidence indicating that usage is missing from Acts 6. Further we also have a statement of purpose – “whom we will appoint to this work”—which fits another established meaning of the phrase “laying on of hands.” Sound judgment, then, demands that we make use of the known, allowable usage of laying on of hands and steer clear of crafting a previously unknown meaning to the Bible phrase “full of the Holy Spirit.”

Discussion continued with Part 2

Acts 6 and the Gift of the Holy Spirit (Part 2)

Posted in Jonathan Jenkins | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Acts 6:3-6 and the Gift of the Holy Spirit – Part 1