Four Words Expose Premillennialism

Four Words Expose Premillennialism

Last week, we noticed how clearly the Bible teaches that it is far more than just being the word of God, it is the words of God. We showed that Jesus said that the words of the Scripture—every letter (jot) and every small marking (tittle)—were more eternal than heaven and earth (Matt. 5:18). He emphatically affirmed that His words would abide, even after heaven and earth passed away (Matt. 24:35).

What is the last day?

What is the last day?

It is remarkable how noticing the words of the Bible help us to not be led astray by doctrines which were almost unknown for 1500 years after the Lord’s death. This doctrine is called premillennialism. It has two major components. The first is that the godly and the ungodly will not be raised at the same time. The second is there will be a thousand years between the resurrection of the believers and the unbelievers. Look at how the study of individual words in Bible passages show us that such ideas cannot be true. Remember that God gave every word of the Bible and has preserved all of them.

The Righteous and the Unrighteous Will Be Raised Together

If the Bible clearly states in words which cannot be misunderstood that at the same time all will be raised, then premillennialism cannot be true. Look at every individual word Jesus spoke about the resurrection. “Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming in which all who are in the graves will hear His voice and come forth—those who have done good to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of condemnation” (John 5:28-29). His words which are eternal are so understandable. He is discussing all that are in the grave—this includes every dead person. He affirms that at the same hour all will hear His voice and all will come out of the grave. This is truth and premillennialism is shown to be false by two words—”all” and “same.”

All Men Will Be Judged at the Same Time

Thousands of individuals have failed to see the difference in the expressions “last days” and “last day.” Jesus said two things would occur on the very last day. He promised the righteous, “I will raise him up on the last day” (John 6:44).  He told the wicked, “The word that I have spoken will judgment him in the last day” (John 12:48).

How many days will there be after the last one? If there is one more day after that day, then that first one was not the last day. Premillennialism demands that there will be a thousand years between these two events. A thousand years is 365,000 days. Jesus’ words make it impossible for there to be a millennial age between the resurrection of the righteous and that of the ungodly.  Two words—”last day”—show premillennial cannot be true.  Believe His words—every one of them!

Posted in Dan Jenkins | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Four Words Expose Premillennialism

Do Not Quench the Spirit

Quenching the Spirit

How does one quench the Spirit?  I have heard a myriad of answers to that question.

How does one quench the Spirit?

How does one quench the Spirit?

I believe the answer to be simple and contextual. The idea of “quenching” the Spirit is found in 1 Thessalonians 5. Here is the immediate context:

Do not quench the Spirit. Do not despise prophecies, but test everything; hold fast what is good. Abstain from every form of evil. (1 Thessalonians 5:19-22)

Many people take these verses as individual admonitions.  So, the idea of not despising prophecy is not connected to the quenching of the Spirit.  However, when one understands that the function of the Spirit in the church is always prophetic, he sees a continuity within the four verses quoted above.

  • 19 – Quenching the Spirit is resisting the prophetic power placed within the church. Just like the Corinthians preferred tongue speaking to prophecy, so the Thessalonians were tempted to minimize the gift of prophecy among them. After all, the spirit of the prophet was subject to the will of the prophet (1 Corinthians 14:32).
  • 20 – Also like the Corinthians, there existed some among the Thessalonians that preferred other gifts or other sources of “revelation” to the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Perhaps, this explains the rise of false doctrine among them by the time of the writing of 2 Thessalonians.
  • 21 – The testing of everything was necessary because false prophets were already springing up in the church. The primary manifestation of this was in the person of the Judaizers (see 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15). Paul is exhorting them to make sure that all “prophecy” among them is truly from the Holy Spirit and to accept everything He has to say.
  • 22 – While this verse has been used to compel Christians to submit to many counter-cultural ideas, it has to do with prophecy among the church. The Thessalonians were to test all prophecy and reject every form of teaching that deviated from the inspired revelation of the Holy Spirit.

The quenching of the Spirit is the act of resisting His prophetic work among the early church.  In the literal sense, we cannot quench Him today.  However, as His prophecy has been fully captured within the text of Scripture, we can, at least in spirit, quench the power of His work today.

 

Posted in Jonathan Jenkins | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Do Not Quench the Spirit

¿CUANTO VALEN TUS LAGRIMAS?

¿CUANTO VALEN TUS LAGRIMAS?

¿Cuantos de nosotros hemos llorado? Creo que dentro del diseño de Dios para con el hombre las lagrimas son esa limpieza de adentro hacia afuera. Es realmente difícil perder a un ser querido o al menos pensar en perder a uno de ellos. Tal vez un caso de infidelidad o quizás la ruptura de una relación  amorosa provoque las lágrimas imparables.

¿Cuanto vale sus lagrimas?

¿Cuanto vale sus lagrimas?

Sabemos por inspiración divina que los mejores hombres de Dios pasaron por ahí. Quizás el más notable por su descripción  tan vivida es David en los salmos. El dice “Cansado estoy de mis gemidos; todas las noches inundo de lagrimas mi lecho…” (Sal 6:6) Este hombre se encontraba cansado de llorar así como cuando usted llora por horas hasta que llega al punto que quiere seguir llorando pero ya no le salen lagrimas. Amigos Nosotros conocemos ese sentir, sabemos que no es nada grato. También expresó “Mis lágrimas han sido mi alimento de día y de noche, mientras me dicen todo el día: ¿Dónde está tu Dios?” (Sal 42:3). En este Salmo el dolor de David en lo más amargo de la aflicción, en el lo más blanco del hueso del sufrimiento la pregunta surge ¿Donde estás tu Dios?. Como si cuando en esos momentos en el que las lagrimas están descendiendo de tus mejillas Dios no estuviera viendo, como si a nadie le importa que “estoy llorando”. La mente humana piensa de esa manera, y permítame decirle que es probable que ese sea el caso. Es muy probable que su hijo desordenado no le interese en lo más mínimo que usted llore por él, o que su ex esté coqueteado con otro o con otra mientras usted está en casa como David (llorando) o peor aún cuando su cónyuge le es infiel. ¿Que difícil es todo eso no lo cree? Sin embargo en el mismo libro de Salmos encontramos algo tan bello. “El que con lágrimas anda, llevando la semilla de la siembra, en verdad volverá con gritos de alegría, trayendo sus gavillas” (Salmos 126:6)  Sabe, esto es como matemático, cuando usted por la causa correcta y desde la perspectiva inocente baña su cama con lagrimas, Dios esta observando, Dios no actúa de inmediato como uno desea, pero El actúa y cuando lo hace estimado amigo lo bendice a usted y a mí mil veces más. El apóstol Pedro lloró igual que usted y que yo. El recuento de Mateo 26:75 dice que lloró amargamente. Amargamente igual que David, amargamente con dolor irreparable, sin embargo tuvo después de la resurrección la oportunidad de decirle a su Maestro que lo amaba… y no solo que lo amaba sino que tuvo el chance de decírselo tres veces… eso no es todo, el Pedro que lloró amargamente se puso de Pie en Hechos 2 para predicar una sermón  que daría comienzo al sueño de Dios desde todos los siglos… su amada Iglesia. En ese día Pedro, el que lloró amargamente convirtió al rededor de 3000 personas a Cristo, el mismo que hace unas semanas le había negado. ¿No es asombroso nuestro Dios.? El puede usar el baso más quebrado y reconstruirlo como la mejor pieza de la vajilla.  ¿Cuanto vale sus lagrimas? Para muchas personas no valen nada, no les interesa en lo absoluto pero en lo secreto, ahí en la soledad de la intimidad con su Dios las lagrimas no pueden ser contadas con precio, Dios está observando su dolor, Dios está admirando su humildad, Dios está esperando que usted se acerque a él para poder limpiar sus mejillas y abrazarle. Salmos 56:8 “pon mis lagrimas en tu redomas” ¿Usted cree que no Dios no se da cuenta, que Dios no ve su corazón sangrar? ¡Oh apreciado amigo!, para el Señor son preciosas, El y solamente El las guarda y las almacena una por una en estos envases.  Es impresionante saber que Dios entiende de esto más de lo que usted se imagina. No es que uno sea muy emocional para Dios cada lagrima cuenta. Dios en su forma humana lloró por alguien a quien sin duda alguna él amaba…Lazaro (Jn.11:35) Seguramente  el haber llorado después en el huerto demuestra su sentimiento, el llanto obedeció a su forma humana sin embargo podemos afirmar que Dios sabe lo que es llorar. Esas ganas reprimidas de llanto necesitan salir… no hay nada malo en llorar, hágalo, desahogase  y comprenda que aunque nadie este viendo su dolor el Padre le conoce y a su debido tiempo el hará. Sus lagrimas importan para alguien y si importan para El simplemente el resto sobra. Dios le bendiga.

Posted in Heiner Montealto | Tagged , , | Comments Off on ¿CUANTO VALEN TUS LAGRIMAS?

Easter: What the Bible Says About It

Easter: What the Bible Says About It

It might surprise people to know that the Bible has absolutely nothing to say about Easter.  Zero.  Zip.  Nada.

Okay, it’s true that the word Easter is found one time in the King James Version:

And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quarternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.

— Acts 12:4

However, check how the other English translations render Acts 12:4, and you’ll see something different.  No mention of Easter at all.  Instead, all of them have the word Passover in place of Easter.  For example, the English Standard Version:

And when he had seized him, he put him in prison, delivering him over to four squads of soldiers to guard him, intending after the Passover to bring him out to the people.

— Acts 12:4

Why do all of the English translations of the Bible talk of Passover in Acts 12:4 while only the King James Version mentions Easter?

No, the apostle Paul did not carry the 1611 with him.

No, the apostle Paul did not carry the 1611 with him.

Well, the New Testament was originally written in Greek, and the original Greek word in Acts 12:4 is pascha, which literally talks about the Jewish holiday of Passover.  So the more literal translation of the verse would mention Passover rather than Easter.

That being the case, why did the King James translators decide to render pascha as Easter?

Basically, it all boils down to a case of allowing a bias towards human traditions to take precedence over communicating a literal translation of the divinely inspired text.  Why do I say that?

Luke was inspired by the Holy Spirit (2 Pet. 1:19-21; cf. 2 Tim. 3:16-17) to write the book of Acts at around A.D. 61-62, according to Wayne Jackson’s commentary The Acts of the Apostles.  As we have seen, he made no mention of Easter at all, in actuality referring to Passover while talking of Peter’s imprisonment of Herod.  This is because the idea of Easter – an annual religious celebration of the resurrection of Jesus Christ – was not something that was thought up until years later.

And it was not God who thought it up, by the way.  In fact, the New Testament doesn’t care too much for religious holidays.  Did you know that?  Check this out:

But now that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God, how can you turn back again to the weak and worthless elementary principles of the world, whose slaves you want to be once more?  You observe days and months and seasons and years!  I am afraid I may have labored over you in vain.

— Galatians 4:9-11

 

Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath.  These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ…These have indeed an appearance of wisdom in promoting self-made religion and asceticism and severity to the body, but they are of no value in stopping the indulgence of the flesh.

— Colossians 2:16-17, 23

Contextually in both of these passages, the Holy Spirit inspired Paul to tell Christians that they did not need nor did he want them to observe religious holidays such as the ones the Jews had observed under the Old Testament.

  • Notice how he calls them “the weak and worthless elementary principles of the world” and “the shadow of the things to come,” while saying that the actual “substance” belongs to Christ.
  • Notice also how he told the Galatians while talking of their observance of religious holidays that he was afraid he may have labored over them “in vain.”
  • After warning them about the religious holidays of Judaism, he went on to warn the Colossians about people insisting that they also involve themselves in asceticism, worship of angels, visions, and regulations about what they should handle, taste, and touch (Col. 2:18, 21).
  • He calls it all – religious holidays included – “the elemental spirits of the world” (v. 20) and “human precepts and teachings” (v. 22).
  • Most tellingly, he said that these human precepts and teachings – which included teaching others to observe religious holidays – “have indeed an appearance of wisdom in promoting self-made religion…but they are of no value in stopping the indulgence of the flesh” (v. 23).  Think about that for a second.  If you decide that you’re going to come to church only because it’s Easter Sunday, is that really going to help you overcome the sin in your life?

So is it any surprise that we find no record in the New Testament of Christians being commanded to observe Easter, Christmas, or any other religious holiday?  Is it any surprise that we have no record of them observing the resurrection of Christ, or his death, or his birth, or any other event in his life, on an annual basis as a special religious holiday?  In fact, the only record we have of any observance they participated in was a weekly worship service on each Sunday during which they remembered Christ’s death through communion (Acts 2:42; 20:7; 1 Cor. 10:16-17; 11:23ff).

We’re also told not to add to God’s Word (Deut. 4:2; Prov. 30:6; 1 Cor. 4:6; Gal. 1:6-9; Rev. 22:18).  Think about that for a second.  If we’re not to add to God’s Word, and God’s Word mentions nada about Christians observing a religious holiday known as Easter, but we go ahead and do it anyway…

Well, you get the picture…

A lot of people don’t, though.  The Bible talks about them, too.

My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge; because you have rejected knowledge, I reject you from being a priest to me.  And since you have forgotten the law of your God, I also will forget your children.

— Hosea 4:6

 

For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.

— 2 Timothy 4:3-4

 

I know that after my departure fierce wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock; and from among your own selves will arise men speaking twisted things, to draw away the disciples after them.

— Acts 20:29-30

God knew that people, either through ignorance of his Word or through wanting to have their own way or both, would depart from what he actually commanded and come up with their own ideas, which in reality would be nothing but falsehoods.  That’s how the idea of Easter came about.

From Wikipedia:

The modern English term Easter derives from the Old English word Ēastre or Ēostre.[nb 2]

The word Easter is held by some to have originally referred to the name of an Anglo-Saxon goddess, Ēostre.[nb 3] Easter is held by others to have originally referred to the name of a Babylonian goddess, Ishtar. [22] Others surmise that Eostre and Ishtar, pronounced identically, are two forms of the same word, referring to two forms of the same goddess, although the spelling differentiated through time and distance. [23]

So when you’re talking about Easter, you’re really talking about the name of some pagan goddess.  Did you know that?  I sure didn’t.

Also from Wikipedia:

The first Christians, Jewish and Gentile, were certainly aware of the Hebrew calendar,[nb 4] and there is no direct evidence that they celebrated any specifically Christian annual festivals.[41] It was probably as an aspect of Passover that Jewish Christians, the first to do so, celebrated the resurrection of Jesus, dated close to Passover.[24]

Direct evidence for the Easter festival begins to appear in the mid-2nd century. Perhaps the earliest extant primary source referencing Easter is a mid-2nd-century Paschal homily attributed to Melito of Sardis, which characterizes the celebration as a well-established one.[41] Evidence for another kind of annual Christian festival, the commemoration of martyrs, begins to appear at about the same time as evidence for the celebration of Easter.[42]

While martyrs’ days (usually the individual dates of martyrdom) were celebrated on fixed dates in the local solar calendar, the date of Easter was fixed by means of the local Jewish lunisolar calendar. This is consistent with the celebration of Easter having entered Christianity during its earliest, Jewish period, but does not leave the question free of doubt.[43]

The ecclesiastical historian Socrates Scholasticus attributes the observance of Easter by the church to the perpetuation of its custom, “just as many other customs have been established”, stating that neither Jesus nor his Apostles enjoined the keeping of this or any other festival. Although he describes the details of the Easter celebration as deriving from local custom, he insists the feast itself is universally observed.[44]

So it looks like Easter came about as a result of “customs,” particularly the customs the early Jewish Christians had of observing Jewish holidays like Passover…even though the Holy Spirit inspired Paul in Galatians and Colossians to tell them not to do that anymore.

And even though Jesus had this to say about human customs:

You hypocrites!  Well did Isaiah prophesy of you, when he said:

“This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.”

— Matthew 15:7-9

So why did the King James translators write Easter instead of the correct Passover while translating pascha in Acts 12:4?  Again, bias towards human tradition rather than what the inspired text actually said.

So what does the Bible actually say about Easter?  Nothing, zip, nada.

But what does the Bible say about Christians collectively observing religious holidays?  Quite a lot, as we’ve seen.  None of it good.

And what does the Bible say about adding to God’s Word?  Quite a lot, as we’ve seen.  None of it good.

Easter isn’t in the Bible.  Think about that if you’re thinking about observing it as a religious holiday…

Posted in Jon Mitchell | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Easter: What the Bible Says About It

The Eternal Word or The Eternal Words

The Eternal Word or The Eternal Words

Many individuals misunderstand the Bible simply because they fail to notice the precise words God chose to be in the Bible. Every letter of every word on the tablets of stone were placed there by God. This is the nature of revelation and inspiration of His message to man. As the Old Testament was being written and completed, He had preserved the inspired word—including every jot and every tittle the prophets wrote (Matt. 5:18).

Every Word is Preserved.

Every Word is Preserved.

The same is true of the New Testament. Jesus affirmed that the New Testament would be kept intact. He said, “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but My words will by no means pass away” (Matt. 24:35). Note that He did not say that His word would not pass away, but His words would not pass away. We do not in some generic way have the word of the Lord; we have His words. If one single word has been lost, then His statement is false.

Look at what He said again. There is absolutely no means by which His words would be lost. For those who ask how we know that in the copying and transmission of the text some of it has not been lost, here is God’s answer. There is no way that the words of the Lord have been lost. Worldly scholarship cannot be compared to Christ’s scholarship.

Jesus taught the same idea in the book of John. Read His words carefully. “He who rejects Me, and does not receive My words has that which judges him—the word that I have spoken will judge him in the last day” (John 12:48). He had taught that His words were more permanent than the universe itself and implied their eternal nature by saying that men would reject His words—not just His word. When the last day comes, these will be the basis of the final judgment.

The last book of the Bible describes this judgment scene. In Matthew He promised that heaven and earth would pass away. John described One who sat on the great white throne and says, “…from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away. And there was found no place for them” (Rev. 20:11). There is no place for heaven or earth after the judgment. Then notice John’s description of the basis of the judgment. Men were not judged by the Book of Life but by the things written in the books. All the books, all sixty-six books of the Old and New Testament will be opened. The fact they are there shows their eternal nature!

Read carefully Paul’s description of the accuracy of the revelation. “Which things also we speak, not in words man’s wisdom teacheth, but which the Spirit teacheth; combing spiritual things with spiritual words” (1 Cor. 2:13). He has given us His words and they are eternal!

Posted in Dan Jenkins | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Eternal Word or The Eternal Words